New advances in optical communications are always interesting. IBM Scientists Create Ultra-Fast Device Which Uses Light for Communication between Computer Chips and IBM jumps ‘last hurdle’ to on-chip optical communication articles tell that IBM scientists few weeks ago unveiled a significant step towards replacing electrical signals that communicate via copper wires between computer chips with tiny silicon circuits that communicate using pulses of light. Their new invention is called a nanophotonic avalanche photodetector. It is the fastest of its kind and could potentially enable breakthroughs in energy-efficient computing. This 40-Gbps photodetector is seen as keystone for enabling promising technology. This photodetector is made of Germanium. “This invention brings the vision of on-chip optical interconnections much closer to reality,” said Dr. T.C. Chen, vice president, Science and Technology, IBM Research. There is also a video in YouTube about this invention.
For several years, IBM has been developing a nanophotonics toolkit for creating optical communications between chips consisting of waveguides, modulators, switches and photodetectors. Over the last few years, IBM has demonstrated silicon modulators for converting electrical signals into light, a silicon delay line for buffering optical signals plus the waveguides and switches necessary to create a complete chip-to-chip optical bus. With the addition of this nanophotonic avalanche photodetector, IBM claims to have its nanoelectronic ducks in-a-row standing poised to obsolete copper wires in favor of optical communications on and among future chips. Let’s wait to see what kind of device will use those technologies first.. and when.
There are also other players on the field. For interesting extra reading take a look at the All-optical communication comes of age article. It has information on all-optical signal processing on a silicon-based device at speeds of more than 100Gb per second.
Image source: video
[...] Light for Communication between Computer Chips « Tomi Engdahl’s ePanorama blog [...]
Are you a professional journalist? You write very well.
I need some advice for my blog….I like your layout. Can you help me? 3 6 5
[...] Light for Communication between Computer Chips « Tomi Engdahl’s ePanorama blog [...]
Great post! I like the blog!
Interesting article. Were did you got all the information from…
Thanks a good deal! I genuinely loved reading this. It makes me want to make my own blog. I do not know what topic though? I am a bank teller but can’t imagine most people wanting to read about that! Possibly I’m wrong. Any ideas?
You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be really something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!
hm, understand:)
Just want commentabout this article, after reading whole of this it make me to have new goal about one important event, hope I can read more great news again from you so I bookmark your website.
The cause why my brakes are so poor is simply because some individuals don’t know how to use signal lights.
amazing article and some fascinating views !
Your writing is outstanding and by significantly some of the coolest I’ve uncovered on the web. Great do the job and hope to see you once again immediately!?!
Intriguing arguments in this article however are you discovering the several complications that we are with your blog layout?
This design is incredible! You certainly know how to keep a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Wonderful job. I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool! Also, please check out my website http://rikon10325.livejournal.com/555.html
I love this blog layout ! How did you make it!? Its very cool!
Bonjour vous quel est votre point de vue de mon nouveau blog sur l’immobilier?
I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an shakiness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this increase.
Your blog rockzz. Thx for these articles!
Open reg from oct to dec. Charge a $10 processing fee and let in the best 26,385 runners weighed by sex and age as seen in the big races of that year. So if 40% of the people that finish marathons in a year are women, then 40% of boston should be women. If 10% of the people that finish marathons are age 40 to 44, then 10% of boston should be 40 to 44. Note: I think finishing a Marathon means running it so all times greater than 5 hours should not be considered in the weighting. This means each year the qualifying time will be different but then the boston would represent the best. Oh and charity should be allowed in but those runners should have the class to say if they did or did not qualify when they tell people that they run boston.
Howdy, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam remarks? If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can advise? I get so much lately it’s driving me crazy so any support is very much appreciated.
This spam prevention service + plugin is worth of every dollar invested: http://akismet.com/
Those are interesting opinions. I dont have any reason to dispute what you say, but my thinking, in general the last few years, is that most pitchers are afraid to throw the ball right over the plate in ANY count. Ive not heard anyone complain of a pitcher being too willing to throw it over the plate. Youd probably say that theres a difference between throwing it down the middle and throwing a strike at the knees on the corner, which no doubt is true. But having a guy willing to let em hit it is a breath of fresh air, even if it does lead to homers.
LOL how did you do that?
It is also true that there is not a dramatic difference most of the time between wines that score 91 points and 93 points. And you could probably make that argument all the way down to 880 and 82 points. Your argument only holds water if you insist that the numbers have scientific validity instead of being what they are meant to beand that is subjective approximations. Every scoring system from Yes or No to Three Stars (not puffs, dammit) to 20 points to 200 points have strengths and weaknesses. Yet, as Clyde Kolm has pointed out, systems of that nature go back decades and decades.
I have really learned newer and more effective things as a result of your site. One other thing I would really like to say is newer laptop os’s are likely to allow extra memory to use, but they additionally demand more memory simply to function. If one’s computer is unable to handle a lot more memory along with the newest software program requires that memory space increase, it may be the time to buy a new Computer. Thanks