Archive for the ‘Telecom and Networking’ Category

IPv6 day @ 8 June 2011

Monday, June 6th, 2011

IPv6 has been considered the internet of the future for the past 15 years. I played with it in the later 1990’s. And after it waiting when it will take on, or will it fail. Disruption might be the only way to force companies into deploying IP version 6 (IPv6) networks. The expected ending of IPv4 addresses has not caused panic. World IPv6 Day coming at 8 June, 2011 (after a few days) might be the extra disruption that is needed. The goal of the Test Flight Day is to motivate organizations across the industry to prepare their services for IPv6 to ensure a successful transition as IPv4 addresses run out.

Google, Facebook, Yahoo!, Akamai and Limelight Networks will be amongst some of the major organisations that will offer their content over IPv6 for a 24-hour “test flight”. I expect to see some hiccups, although most of the things should work without problems. Google expects less than one per cent of requests to fail on IPv6 day. The vast majority (99.95%) of Internet users shouldn’t see anything out of the ordinary. For the remaining 0.05% of users, misconfigured or misbehaving network equipment, particularly in home networks, may impair access to participating websites during the trial.

You can test your IPv6 connectivity in advance with http://www.kame.net/, http://test-ipv6.com/, Wireshark IPv4 and IPv6 Connectivity Test or ipv6test.google.com. Don’t worry if you don’t have IPv6 at all (just “old” IPv4 connectivity), you shouldn’t have problems on websites that add IPv6 support on World IPv6 Day.

header4

WTF is… 4G

Tuesday, May 31st, 2011

The great thing about standards, as some wit once said, is that there are so many to choose from. Mobile phones have a multiplicity of standards, nested within one another like a messy set of Russian dolls filled with alphabet soup.

WTF is… 4G article tells about the newest hot mobile phone standard. The ‘generations’ of mobile networks are fairly loose, but appear roughly once a decade: the first, analogue, 1G cellular networks around 1981, then digital 2G in about 1992, 3G at the turn of the century.

And now 4G is the hot topic: 4G will be a pure packet-switched TCP/IP network, running everything over IPv6. Voice becomes VoIP. There are two competing 4G technologies: LTE and WiMax. Now it seems that almost everyone going with LTE. What will become the 4G mobile standard for the whole world is 3GPP Release 10: LTE Advanced. It’s a compatible enhancement of LTE to bring it up to the ITU stipulations.

The single most important characteristic of true 4G is that it doesn’t exist yet. Many of the current generation of 4G-branded phones in the US are not actually 4G, whatever their names may suggest.

News on very fast Ethernet standards

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

I still like to follow what is happening IEEE is doing on Ethernet standardization, although there has been around 10 years since I last time was part of the process. I was participating in Ethernet in the first mile (EFM) standardization work at years 2000-2001 (at that time I worked for Nokia).

There is always something new coming. Now IEEE Seeks Data On Ethernet Bandwidth Needs. The IEEE has formed a group to assess demand for a faster form of Ethernet, taking the first step toward what could become a Terabit Ethernet standard. This time around, the information gathered may help the next high-speed Ethernet group decide whether to aim for 1T bps or 400G bps. There are much more significant challenges involved in achieving Terabit Ethernet than there are in 400G bps. The ad hoc group has met a few times since late February.

There is also push is on to cut 100G Ethernet’s price. Less than a year after 100-Gigabit Ethernet was standardized, an industry group is considering a set of specifications that might make the high-speed technology less expensive and more useful. The IEEE 802.3 100-Gigabit Backplane and Copper Cable Study Group of the IEEE try to make it easier to build modules with more 100GE ports. The effort to develop specifications for 100GE backplanes and narrow cable interface. Standardization of the backplane should help 100GE move beyond proprietary designs and create a larger ecosystem of component vendors.

Why isn’t the Web using it HTTPS always?

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

You wouldn’t write your username and passwords on a postcard and mail it for the world to see, so why are you doing it online? Every time you log in to any service that uses a plain HTTP connection that’s essentially what you’re doing.

There is a better way, the secure version of HTTPHTTPS. HTTPS has been around nearly as long as the Web, but it’s primarily used by sites that handle money. HTTPS is the combination of HTTP and TLS. Transport Layer Security (TLS) and its predecessor, Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), are cryptographic protocols that provide communications security over the Internet.

1in9ui5t_HTTPS_Application_Layer

Web security got a shot in the arm last year when the FireSheep network sniffing tool made it easy for anyone to capture your current session’s log-in cookie insecure networks. That prompted a number of large sites to begin offering encrypted versions of their services via HTTPS connections. So the Web is clearly moving toward more HTTPS connections; why not just make everything HTTPS?

HTTPS is more secure, so why isn’t the Web using it? gives some interesting background on HTTPS. There are some practical issues most Web developers are probably aware of.

The real problem is that with HTTPS you lose the ability to cache. For sites that don’t have any reason to encrypt anything (you never log in and just see public information) the overhead and loss of caching that comes with HTTPS just doesn’t make sense. The most content on this site for example don’t have any reason to encrypt anything.

HTTPS SSL initial key exchange also adds to the latency, so HTTPS-only Web would, with today’s technology, be slower. The fact that more and more websites are adding support of HTTPS shows that users do value security over speed, so long as the speed difference is minimal.

The cost of operations for HTTPS site is higher than normal HTTP: you need certificated that cost money and more server resource. There is cost of secure certificates, but obviously that’s not as much of an issue with large Web services that have millions of dollars. The certificate cost can be a showstopper for some smaller low budget sites.

Perhaps the main reason most of us are not using HTTPS to serve our websites is simply that it doesn’t work well with virtual hosts. There is a way to make virtual hosting and HTTPS work together (the TLS Extensions protocol Server Name Indication (SNI)) but so far, it’s only partially implemented.

In the end there is no real technical reason the whole Web couldn’t use HTTPS. There are practical reasons why it isn’t just yet happening today.

Ethernet networks for telecom operators

Monday, March 21st, 2011

Hardware developers familiar with the history of Ethernet in the enterprise may find themselves overwhelmed by the service diversity and complexity which must be addressed in applications for the local exchange carrier, long-haul or inter-exchange provider, and wireless operator. Analyze service complexity in a common Ethernet infrastructure article tasks Ethernet is called upon to perform in telecommunications operator environment seem almost unbelievably complex.

Network aggregation points must handle constantly changing mixes of voice, video, and data, requiring a steady packet-transport service along with circuit emulation and fault-tolerant protection switching. These diverse services would need to be supported regardless of the transport protocol, or regardless of whether carriers had switched to an all-packet infrastructure. The reason that those different services needs to be supported is that they are widely used (many telecommunications system rely on them) and they are core business for the operators (where the money comes in).

Read also Metro Ethernet article from Wikipedia and Explaining Where Ethernet Fits Into the Mobile Operator’s Network Evolution Plans slide set.

Last IPv4 Addresses Allocated

Friday, February 4th, 2011

Today is a historic milestone for the Internet: the allocation of the last remaining IPv4 Internet addresses from a central pool. The ICANN pool of available unallocated addresses for IPv4 is completely depleted.

The allocation of the final IPv4 addresses is analogous to the last crates of a product leaving a manufacturing warehouse and going to the regional stores or distributions centers, where they can still be distributed to the public. Once they are gone, the supply is exhausted. It’s only a matter of time before the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must start denying requests for IPv4 address space.

This is not the IPocalypse. The Internet technical community has been planning for IPv4 depletion for some time. IPv6, a new Internet Protocol with a massive amount of address space, is already taking over as IPv4 runs out. For most users, all it means is that your computer’s IP address today might look like 192.0.2.10 (an example IPv4 address), but soon it may resemble 2001:0DB8::/feed:b766 (an example IPv6 address).

The next big event for IPv6 deployment is World IPv6 Day on 8 June, 2011. The goal of this Test Flight Day is to motivate organizations across the industry – Internet service providers, hardware makers, operating system vendors and web companies – to prepare their services for IPv6 to ensure a successful transition as IPv4 addresses run out. Want to find out your IPv6 readiness? Use this test.

1G, 2G, 3G, 4G, and everything between

Sunday, January 23rd, 2011

Just what is “4G,” anyway? It’s one higher than 3G, sure, but does that necessarily mean it’s better? 2G, 3G, 4G, and everything in between: an Engadget wireless primer tries to answer those and some other questions on mobile communications technologies.

Here is my “short” summary of the different generations:

1G: Analogue cellphone technologies introduces in early 1980s: AMPS in the US, TACS and NMT in Europe
2G: The early nineties saw the rise of the first digital cellular networks: GSM in Europe, D-AMPS “TDMA” and IS-95 CDMA in the US
2.5G: You know you’re in trouble when you need a decimal place! GPRS packet data introduced to GSM system in 1997.
2.75G: EDGE was conceived as an easy way for operators of GSM networks to squeeze some extra juice out of their 2.5G networks
2.9G: Same EDGE that some call with name 2.75G. Now you know how in trouble you are with a decimal place!
3G: ITU IMT-2000 standard, CDMA2000 offered CDMA networks an “always-on” data in US (1xEV-DO protocol provided 3G speeds), UMTS (WCDMA) rose to the top as the 3G choice for GSM operators
3.5G: High Speed Packet Access (HSPA) extends and improves the performance of existing WCDMA protocols, designed provide mobile broadband access of several Mbit/s to laptop computers and smartphones.
3.75G: HSPA+ provides theoretical HSPA data rates up to 84 Megabits per second (Mbit/s) on the downlink and 22 Mbit/s on the uplink through the use of a multiple-antenna technique known as MIMO
4G: WiMAX and LTE almost meet the original ITU 4G criteria and are often marketed as “4G”, former tops out at around 40Mbps and the latter around 100Mbps theoretical
5G: 5G (5th generation mobile networks or 5th generation wireless systems) is a name used in some research papers and projects to denote the next major phase of mobile telecommunications standards beyond the 4G standards (expected to start being used around 2020), expected to offer peak download and upload speeds of more than the 1 Gbps

For years you’ve probably seen people argue that WiMax or LTE technically is not true fourth generation (”4G”) wireless because it didn’t meet certain criteria. Although LTE is often marketed as 4G, first-release LTE does not fully comply with the IMT Advanced 4G requirements. Since the International Telecommunications Union had never set a standard for what 4G was, it was a little hard to make any qualification. LTE, WiMax Now Officially Not Technically ‘4G’ article tells that ITU has officially come out with a statement declaring that only WiMax 2 (802.16m, or WirelessMAN-Advance 2) and LTE-Advanced can technically be declared “4G”: “Harmonization among these proposals has resulted in two technologies, “LTE-Advanced1″ and “WirelessMAN-Advanced2″ being accorded the official designation of IMT-Advanced, qualifying them as true 4G technologies.”

Everything LTE is a brand new microsite from Test & Measurement World dedicated to the long-term-evolution (LTE) wireless technology market. It features insightful blogs industry news, videos, whitepapers, case studies, etc. Interesting looking site.

Communicating LED lamps

Friday, January 7th, 2011

LEDs are used for a long time for all kinds of data communications applications ranging from wireless IR remote controls and IrDA to wired fiber optics communication. There has been many years ago also ideas on optical wireless LANs based on infrared, but they faded quickly. But now when LED lights are becoming very popular this idea could see a second coming.

Ceiling lights in Minn. send coded Internet data article tells about LED lights that will transmit data to specially equipped computers on desks below by flickering faster than the eye can see. The first few light fixtures built by LVX System will be installed in six municipal buildings in the central Minnesota. The LVX system puts clusters of its light-emitting diodes in a standard-sized light fixture. The LEDs transmit coded messages A light on the modem talks back to the fixture overhead, where there is sensor to receive the return signal and transmit the data over the Internet. It works in almost exactly the same way that fiber optic systems do, except the sender and receiver aren’t connected by a cable. Communicating lights are set up using just ordinary power connections. The first generation of the LVX system will transmit data at speeds of about 3 megabits per second. If you are interested check video from Get ElectricTV.

vermeil_IEC_LED_Symbol

There is another application that also combines wireless communications and LED lights. Finnish article Wlan ohjaa yksittäisiä led-loisteputkia (read English translation) tells about LED light tubes can be controlled by a WLAN connection, even individually. Finnish company Valtavalo has licensed Netled control technology from Yashima Dengyo Co., Ltd. and sells their products. Netled technology is designed to provide means to monitor in electricity consumption in real time and control the various LED light tube groups.

GSM is insecure

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

Whatever assurances have been given about the security of GSM cellphone calls, forget about them now. Breaking GSM With a $15 Phone … Plus Smarts article tells that a pair of researchers demonstrated a start-to-finish means of eavesdropping on encrypted GSM cellphone calls and text messages, using only four sub-$15 telephones as network “sniffers,” a laptop computer and a variety of open source software. To create a network sniffer, the researchers replaced the firmware of a simple Motorola GSM phone with their own alternative, which allowed them to retain the raw data received from the cell network, and examine more of the cellphone network space than a single phone ordinarily monitors. Upgrading the USB connection allowed this information to be sent in real time to a computer.

While such capabilities have long been available to law enforcement with the resources to buy a powerful network-sniffing device, the pieced-together hack takes advantage of security flaws and shortcuts in the GSM network operators’ technology and operations to put the power within the reach of almost any motivated tech-savvy programmer.

GMS is all a 20-year-old infrastructure, with lots of private data and not a lot of security. Several of the individual pieces of this GSM hack have been displayed before. For example the ability to decrypt GSM’s 64-bit A5/1 encryption was demonstrated last year.

tonyk_phone

“GSM is insecure, the more so as more is known about GSM,” said Security Research Labs researcher Karsten Nohl on the article. “It’s pretty much like computers on the net in the 1990s, when people didn’t understand security well.”

Energy Efficient Ethernet

Sunday, December 19th, 2010

Ethernet link speeds of 100 megabits per second or even 1 Gbit/s per second are typical in today’s LANs. When everything is wired to Ethernet LAN very many LAN connections are needed and they consume some power. And the faster the Ethernet connection is, typically more power it consumes.

RJ45M8P1

IEEE Spectrum Energy-Efficient Ethernet article tells that Ethernet connections waste lots of watts and it need not necessarily need be so. On average, people use their Ethernet links at full throttle less than 5 percent of the time. But the circuitry on the network-interface controller, the chip that connects your computer to the network, is always running at full speed, thus wasting power.

One seemingly simple solution is to adapt the Ethernet link’s speed to match a device’s needs. This concept is called Adaptive Link Rate. The problem in this concept is that switching between Ethernet speeds is time-consuming. When you change link rate today, you have to drop the link and reestablish it, which takes up to 2seconds.

Another concept is called low-power idle, it proposes transferring data on an Ethernet link at the highest possible rate and then putting the network controller chip into a sleep-like state. The trouble is that turning on a dormant network card quickly is a challenge, but it is easier than switching between rates.

Wikipedia Energy Efficient Ethernet article tells that Energy Efficient Ethernet, also known as IEEE 802.3az, is a set of enhancements to the twisted-pair and backplane ethernet networking standards that allow for less power consumption during periods of low link use. The goal is to reduce power use by 50% or more, while remaining fully compatible with existing equipment. The power reduction is accomplished in a few ways:

  • For 100 Mbit/s and gigabit speed links, ethernet chips that don’t have data to send would put the physical layer of the system into sleep mode. Gigabit interface card might be able to reduce its power by up to 1.5 W.
  • For 10 Gbit/s links, speeds are stepped down to slower speeds saving 10 – 20 W per link (twisted pair Gbit/s links consume typically 15W or so power)
  • A new lower voltage mode was added to 10Base-T (lower voltage used when full voltage is not needed for example on shorter links)

There were some companies introduced technology to reduce the power required for Ethernet before the standard was set. The best known of them was D-Link’s and Broadcom’s Green Ethernet, which is a superset of the draft 802.3az. Green Ethernet was first employed on home switches and smart switches. D-Link claims that a power savings of up to 45 – 80 percent can be made using its Green Ethernet switches, but I think in real life applications the savings will be somewhat less than those promises.

Broadcom delivers energy-efficient Ethernet silicon article about Broadcom’s portfolio of available silicon supporting the newly ratified IEEE 802.3az-2010 Energy Efficient Ethernet (EEE) standard and proprietary AutoGrEEEn technology. roadcom Infrastructure & Networking Group, said in a press release, “Energy efficiency is of crucial importance to our customers and to the networking industry as a whole.”

The power savings for an individual consumer level device are likely to be modest compared to the cost of device or the embodied energy, so turning off existing devices when they are idle is likely to be a more immediate savings. If Energy Efficient Ethernet is widely incorporated into new systems, it could reduce networking power requirements as systems are replaced. Green Ethernet Technology is pushing into networking hardware market.

eee


film izle hd korku filmleri film izle seyret komedi filmleri aksiyon filmleri 2012 filmleri kemal sunal filmleri romantik komedi izle macera filmleri komedi filmi izle komedi filmleri film izle film izle film izle film izle hd film izle