He's got to be Vanjoking!

Nokia‘s Executive Vice President Anssi Vanjoki just recently told that Cell Phone Cameras Will Replace DSLRs. Reuters put out news Nokia exec: phones to make system cameras obsolete which says that according to Nokia sales chief fast developing cameraphone technology will shortly make SLR system cameras and even professional cameras obsolete. It was even claimed that in the near future camera phones will be better than a DSLR.

If you know anything about serious photography it might be hard for you to believe those claims. He’s got to be Vanjoking! It is true that the number of pixels in the cell phone cameras is constantly increasing. A modern cell phone camera can have as many or more pixels than quite decent digital camera had some years ago. But the the number of pixels does not tell the whole story on the image quality. More important than the resolution is the image quality. There are many other things that need to be right to get good image quality.

The Register does a pretty good job of explaining why Vanjoki’s statement is so asinine; however, most Photography Bay readers won’t have a problem of understanding that the tiny sensors in a cell phone can’t rival the image quality produce by much larger DSLR sensors. This is notwithstanding the difference in lens quality between cell phones and larger, DSLR-system lenses.

Two important things on digital photography is quality of the optics and the noise properties of the image sensor. DSLR typically are far superior on both of them compared to the small optics and image sensor used on cell phone. Let’s see if one day Nokia has something that can actually live up to his promises – nothing nas yet come even near to that. DSLR are still needed when you want to take good quality photos. And I expect that this trend wil continue. There are many physical things that make it very hard to build a very small camera (one that easily fits inside cell phone) that gives very good image quality. One photo taken with Nokia’s fancy-pants cell phone camera will demonstrate to any DSLR user that Nokia’s hype is nothing but hot air. Professional photographers will keep their DSLR and bag of lenses for a long time.

I’m not knocking on against cell phone cameras, they have their uses and they are easy to carry out. But when you need good picture quality they are not the right tool. At perfect lighting conditions cell phone cameras can take very nice pictures, but when conditions are not ideal cell phone imeage quality is usually quite poor (compared to what you would get with a pocket digital camera or DSLR).

Vanjoki said high-definition (HD) quality video recording was also coming to cellphones within the next 12 months. This time next year should should have a mobile phone capable of capturing 720p, maybe even 1080p, video and outputting it to a television, preferably via HDMI. Vanjoki was, however, accurate in one of his Helsinki comments: “It will not take long, less than a year, when phones can record HD quality video and you can transfer it directly to your HD television set.” With small-sensor pixel counts increasing and the power required to operate them decreasing, he may very well be correct.

It will, however, be usually crappy-looking HD video. Reasons are the same than in photography. We will still need those big, heavy and expensive professional video cameras if we want to make “broadcast quality” video.


  1. Hong Olecki says:

    hi,nice pants in your post,I love thatgreatpants,I need to find one for me,bill

  2. Elden Cohea says:

    Hi,this is really a great jeans,I like the classic pants.

  3. Hayabusa Gurl says:

    Being a blogger is like being in charge of your own personal insane asylum.

    Sent via Blackberry

  4. spyware removal phoenix says:

    It’s great to see this site is finally getting the attention that it really deserves. Keep up the terrific work.

  5. Finnish telecom industry – going to hell? « Tomi Engdahl’s ePanorama blog says:

    [...] product. Now they are market followers, just releasing quote crappy new phone models. The comments Anssi Vanjoki gives to press do not give a good picture of him or his leadership. Nokia is the [...]

  6. earn points says:

    This is absolutely perfect :D Thanks for putting this online.

  7. virtualwebworx says:

    Great stuff!
    in car experts

  8. Electronics technologies for 2012 « Tomi Engdahl’s ePanorama blog says:

    [...] start to replace traditional separate devices for different functions. This is happening for small digital cameras and video cameras. 2012 At the end of 2012 there is the more navigation capable mobile phones than [...]

  9. New camera technologies: Light field photos « Tomi Engdahl’s ePanorama blog says:

    [...] There needs to be a good reason for carrying around a 2nd device for taking pictures. So digital cameras need to become continuously better than their mobile phone counterparts. There are a few easy ways to make a digital camera better: make the sensor bigger, improve the quality of the lens, speed up the processor. DSLRs have gone this route for a long time. DSLRs are able to produce considerably better pictures than mobile phones so cell phone cameras will not completely replace DSLRs any time soon. [...]

  10. Orval Mogle says:

    Can I just say what a relief to seek out someone who truly is aware of what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know learn how to convey a problem to gentle and make it important. More people have to learn this and understand this aspect of the story. I cant consider youre not more widespread since you definitely have the gift.

  11. Audio and video trends for 2014 « Tomi Engdahl’s ePanorama blog says:

    [...] be heading to is smaller, more portable, more disposable and mirrorless (DSLRs have a mirror). When Nokia’s Executive Vice President Anssi Vanjoki told 2010 that Cell Phone Cameras Will Replace DSLR…, I could not believe that on time. But it really seems to become more and more to truth in 2014: [...]


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *