Comments on: Software testing

By: Elvia

Elvia — Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:16:12 +0000

I think this is one of the such a lot significant info for me.
And i am satisfied reading your article. However
should commentary on some general things, The website taste is perfect, the articles is really excellent :
D. Good process, cheers

By: Local Moving Services AZ

Local Moving Services AZ — Mon, 16 Nov 2015 04:43:15 +0000

You could certainly see your skills within the work you
write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers such
as you who are not afraid to mention how they believe.
Always go after your heart.

By: Data Migration Testing

Data Migration Testing — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:46:42 +0000

Here I found very informative post for my software testing workshop it helps me lot. Thanks for sharing.

By: Michael Diamond

Michael Diamond — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:02:17 +0000

I don’t know how true this is – certainly OS projects /can/ have lackluster documentation, but the notion that technical writers write useful content, or that expensive software is well documented, is at best a generalization. In my experience, open source projects are better documented, and have knowledgeable people willing to help you out, whereas expensive software is often loosely documented, is incredibly wordy and uninformative (thank you technical writers) and the support staff is uninterested at best, and unintelligent at worst. A personal anecdotal example is the very expensive enterprise software MicroStrategy. Admittedly a very nice product with a lot of features, but the support and documentation are miserably unhelpful. I theorize that open source developers have to ‘sell’ people with documentation, whereas pay-for products have sales people to do that.