<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four primary principles of success of Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2013/05/02/four-primary-principles-of-success-of-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2013/05/02/four-primary-principles-of-success-of-linux/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 10:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2013/05/02/four-primary-principles-of-success-of-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-33854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/blog/?p=19513#comment-33854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The coming push for open source everything
http://www.infoworld.com/d/data-center/the-coming-push-open-source-everything-223011

When we can no longer trust proprietary hardware or software, open source becomes the only option

With the news about PRISM and other clandestine data-vacuuming operations in place all over the world, it&#039;s clear there&#039;s a problem. It&#039;s not just about hoovering up information from millions of people -- it&#039;s the vast number of devices that can no longer be trusted for use in business and government. When the code running anywhere along a data path is not open source, there&#039;s a chance it&#039;s doing something you can&#039;t know about and potentially transmitting data to someone who shouldn&#039;t have it. That possibility should serve to upset even nontechnical executives, to say nothing about governments all over the world.

Open source closes the backdoors
With open source, the veil is already lifted, and an army of developers inspects the code all the time. The potential for hidden backdoors is dramatically reduced. But that doesn&#039;t really matter if you go deep enough.

Sure, you can install pfSense on a server and know it&#039;s not backdoored, but what about the hardware within the server itself? What about the TCP offloading code in the NICs? Or the BIOS? It could contain a nefarious element that you simply can&#039;t trust -- unless, of course, all that code were open source as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The coming push for open source everything<br />
<a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/data-center/the-coming-push-open-source-everything-223011" rel="nofollow">http://www.infoworld.com/d/data-center/the-coming-push-open-source-everything-223011</a></p>
<p>When we can no longer trust proprietary hardware or software, open source becomes the only option</p>
<p>With the news about PRISM and other clandestine data-vacuuming operations in place all over the world, it&#8217;s clear there&#8217;s a problem. It&#8217;s not just about hoovering up information from millions of people &#8212; it&#8217;s the vast number of devices that can no longer be trusted for use in business and government. When the code running anywhere along a data path is not open source, there&#8217;s a chance it&#8217;s doing something you can&#8217;t know about and potentially transmitting data to someone who shouldn&#8217;t have it. That possibility should serve to upset even nontechnical executives, to say nothing about governments all over the world.</p>
<p>Open source closes the backdoors<br />
With open source, the veil is already lifted, and an army of developers inspects the code all the time. The potential for hidden backdoors is dramatically reduced. But that doesn&#8217;t really matter if you go deep enough.</p>
<p>Sure, you can install pfSense on a server and know it&#8217;s not backdoored, but what about the hardware within the server itself? What about the TCP offloading code in the NICs? Or the BIOS? It could contain a nefarious element that you simply can&#8217;t trust &#8212; unless, of course, all that code were open source as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2013/05/02/four-primary-principles-of-success-of-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-33853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/blog/?p=19513#comment-33853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why talent for tech is different than skill
http://www.infoworld.com/d/data-center/why-talent-tech-different-skill-223484

Taming technology is sometimes more art than science, but the difference can sometimes be hard to discern

Wherever you are in IT, you&#039;ve probably come across colleagues who were extremely skilled at their jobs -- system administrators who can bend a zsh shell to their every whim, or developers who can write lengthy functions that compile without a whimper the first time. You&#039;ve probably also come across colleagues who were extremely talented -- who could instantly visualize a new infrastructure addition and sketch it out to extreme detail on a whiteboard while they assembled it in their head, for example, or who could devise a new, elegant UI without breaking a sweat.

The truly gifted among us exhibit both of those traits, but most fall into one category or another. There is a difference between skill and talent. Such is true in many vocations, of course, but IT can present a stark contrast between the two.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why talent for tech is different than skill<br />
<a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/data-center/why-talent-tech-different-skill-223484" rel="nofollow">http://www.infoworld.com/d/data-center/why-talent-tech-different-skill-223484</a></p>
<p>Taming technology is sometimes more art than science, but the difference can sometimes be hard to discern</p>
<p>Wherever you are in IT, you&#8217;ve probably come across colleagues who were extremely skilled at their jobs &#8212; system administrators who can bend a zsh shell to their every whim, or developers who can write lengthy functions that compile without a whimper the first time. You&#8217;ve probably also come across colleagues who were extremely talented &#8212; who could instantly visualize a new infrastructure addition and sketch it out to extreme detail on a whiteboard while they assembled it in their head, for example, or who could devise a new, elegant UI without breaking a sweat.</p>
<p>The truly gifted among us exhibit both of those traits, but most fall into one category or another. There is a difference between skill and talent. Such is true in many vocations, of course, but IT can present a stark contrast between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2013/05/02/four-primary-principles-of-success-of-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-33852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 07:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/blog/?p=19513#comment-33852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Addressable markets for high-end phones
http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2013/5/6/addressable-markets-for-the-iphone

There were about 5.2bn adults on earth at the end of 2012. Of those, around 3.2bn had mobile SIMs, though not necessarily phones

Within that, roughly 1.1bn had &#039;smartphones&#039; at the end of 2012, of which around 900m ran either the iOS or Android versions of Unix. (As an aside, it is pretty striking that almost a fifth of the earth&#039;s adult population has a Unix box in their pocket.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addressable markets for high-end phones<br />
<a href="http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2013/5/6/addressable-markets-for-the-iphone" rel="nofollow">http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2013/5/6/addressable-markets-for-the-iphone</a></p>
<p>There were about 5.2bn adults on earth at the end of 2012. Of those, around 3.2bn had mobile SIMs, though not necessarily phones</p>
<p>Within that, roughly 1.1bn had &#8216;smartphones&#8217; at the end of 2012, of which around 900m ran either the iOS or Android versions of Unix. (As an aside, it is pretty striking that almost a fifth of the earth&#8217;s adult population has a Unix box in their pocket.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centos</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2013/05/02/four-primary-principles-of-success-of-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-33851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[centos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 05:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/blog/?p=19513#comment-33851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the valuable info you supply on your articles. I will bookmark your blog and take a look at once more right here regularly. I am moderately certain I will be told lots of new stuff right right here! Best of luck for the following!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the valuable info you supply on your articles. I will bookmark your blog and take a look at once more right here regularly. I am moderately certain I will be told lots of new stuff right right here! Best of luck for the following!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
