<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New camera science and technologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/08/29/new-camera-science-and-technologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/08/29/new-camera-science-and-technologies/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/08/29/new-camera-science-and-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-1074481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27168#comment-1074481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With many-worlds, all quantum mechanics is local
But that doesn&#039;t make for evidence that parallel universes exist.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/07/with-many-worlds-all-quantum-mechanics-is-local/

Quantum nonlocality, perhaps one of the most mysterious features of quantum mechanics, may not be a real phenomenon. Or at least that’s what a new paper in the journal PNAS asserts. Its author claims that nonlocality is nothing more than an artifact of the Copenhagen interpretation, the most widely accepted interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Nonlocality is a feature of quantum mechanics where particles are able to influence each other instantaneously regardless of the distance between them, an impossibility in classical physics. Counterintuitive as it may be, nonlocality is currently an accepted feature of the quantum world, apparently verified by many experiments. It’s achieved such wide acceptance that even if our understandings of quantum physics turn out to be completely wrong, physicists think some form of nonlocality would be a feature of whatever replaced it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With many-worlds, all quantum mechanics is local<br />
But that doesn&#8217;t make for evidence that parallel universes exist.<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/07/with-many-worlds-all-quantum-mechanics-is-local/" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/07/with-many-worlds-all-quantum-mechanics-is-local/</a></p>
<p>Quantum nonlocality, perhaps one of the most mysterious features of quantum mechanics, may not be a real phenomenon. Or at least that’s what a new paper in the journal PNAS asserts. Its author claims that nonlocality is nothing more than an artifact of the Copenhagen interpretation, the most widely accepted interpretation of quantum mechanics.</p>
<p>Nonlocality is a feature of quantum mechanics where particles are able to influence each other instantaneously regardless of the distance between them, an impossibility in classical physics. Counterintuitive as it may be, nonlocality is currently an accepted feature of the quantum world, apparently verified by many experiments. It’s achieved such wide acceptance that even if our understandings of quantum physics turn out to be completely wrong, physicists think some form of nonlocality would be a feature of whatever replaced it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/08/29/new-camera-science-and-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-1031239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27168#comment-1031239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quantum physics enables revolutionary imaging method
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-08/uov-qpe082814.php

Researchers from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), the Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ), and the University of Vienna have developed a fundamentally new quantum imaging technique with strikingly counterintuitive features. For the first time, an image has been obtained without ever detecting the light that was used to illuminate the imaged object, while the light revealing the image never touches the imaged object.

In general, to obtain an image of an object one has to illuminate it with a light beam and use a camera to sense the light that is either scattered or transmitted through that object. The type of light used to shine onto the object depends on the properties that one would like to image. Unfortunately, in many practical situations the ideal type of light for the illumination of the object is one for which cameras do not exist.

The experiment published in Nature this week for the first time breaks this seemingly self-evident limitation. The object (e.g. the contour of a cat) is illuminated with light that remains undetected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantum physics enables revolutionary imaging method<br />
<a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-08/uov-qpe082814.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-08/uov-qpe082814.php</a></p>
<p>Researchers from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), the Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ), and the University of Vienna have developed a fundamentally new quantum imaging technique with strikingly counterintuitive features. For the first time, an image has been obtained without ever detecting the light that was used to illuminate the imaged object, while the light revealing the image never touches the imaged object.</p>
<p>In general, to obtain an image of an object one has to illuminate it with a light beam and use a camera to sense the light that is either scattered or transmitted through that object. The type of light used to shine onto the object depends on the properties that one would like to image. Unfortunately, in many practical situations the ideal type of light for the illumination of the object is one for which cameras do not exist.</p>
<p>The experiment published in Nature this week for the first time breaks this seemingly self-evident limitation. The object (e.g. the contour of a cat) is illuminated with light that remains undetected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
