<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old media and new media &#8211; part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 22:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maryjane</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1549664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maryjane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 07:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1549664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[great information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawi Moore</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1547067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hawi Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 12:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1547067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1536113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2017 21:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1536113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Shafer / Politico:
Study: 88.5% of the total time UK readers devote to 11 national newspaper brands is spent on the print edition, while 7.49% goes to mobile and 4% to PCs

 Print Still Refuses to Surrender
The readers have spoken: You can pry their newspapers from their cold, dead hands.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/print-still-refuses-to-surrender-214732]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Shafer / Politico:<br />
Study: 88.5% of the total time UK readers devote to 11 national newspaper brands is spent on the print edition, while 7.49% goes to mobile and 4% to PCs</p>
<p> Print Still Refuses to Surrender<br />
The readers have spoken: You can pry their newspapers from their cold, dead hands.<br />
<a href="http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/print-still-refuses-to-surrender-214732" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/print-still-refuses-to-surrender-214732</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1536112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2017 21:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1536112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germany struggles to fight anti-migrant fake news amid fears it could influence its election
https://news.vice.com/story/germany-fake-news-election-migrants]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Germany struggles to fight anti-migrant fake news amid fears it could influence its election<br />
<a href="https://news.vice.com/story/germany-fake-news-election-migrants" rel="nofollow">https://news.vice.com/story/germany-fake-news-election-migrants</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1536084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2017 15:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1536084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh Constine / TechCrunch: 	
Ev Williams: our goal is to launch Medium consumer subscription product this quarter

Medium plans to launch a consumer subscription product this quarter
https://techcrunch.com/2017/02/02/medium-subscriptions/

Medium CEO Ev Williams announced today at Upfront Summit that his company will launch a consumer subscription product, with the first version coming this quarter. This could help develop an additional revenue stream apart from advertisements. Finding a strong revenue source is critical, since Medium decided to lay off 50 staff, close its New York office, and announce a new direction last month.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh Constine / TechCrunch:<br />
Ev Williams: our goal is to launch Medium consumer subscription product this quarter</p>
<p>Medium plans to launch a consumer subscription product this quarter<br />
<a href="https://techcrunch.com/2017/02/02/medium-subscriptions/" rel="nofollow">https://techcrunch.com/2017/02/02/medium-subscriptions/</a></p>
<p>Medium CEO Ev Williams announced today at Upfront Summit that his company will launch a consumer subscription product, with the first version coming this quarter. This could help develop an additional revenue stream apart from advertisements. Finding a strong revenue source is critical, since Medium decided to lay off 50 staff, close its New York office, and announce a new direction last month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1534911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 17:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1534911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fake News Is About to Get Even Scarier than You Ever Dreamed
What we saw in the 2016 election is nothing compared to what we need to prepare for in 2020.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/01/fake-news-technology

Less than a month after Donald Trump was improbably elected the 45th president of the United States, a strange story began to make its way across social media. 

At corporations and universities across the country, incipient technologies appear likely to soon obliterate the line between real and fake. Or, in the simplest of terms, advancements in audio and video technology are becoming so sophisticated that they will be able to replicate real news—real TV broadcasts, for instance, or radio interviews—in unprecedented, and truly indecipherable, ways. One research paper published last year by professors at Stanford University and the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg demonstrated how technologists can record video of someone talking and then change their facial expressions in real time. The professors’ technology could take a news clip of, say, Vladimir Putin, and alter his facial expressions in real time in hard-to-detect ways. In fact, in this video demonstrating the technology, the researchers show how they did manipulate Putin’s facial expressions and responses, among those of other people, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake News Is About to Get Even Scarier than You Ever Dreamed<br />
What we saw in the 2016 election is nothing compared to what we need to prepare for in 2020.<br />
<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/01/fake-news-technology" rel="nofollow">http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/01/fake-news-technology</a></p>
<p>Less than a month after Donald Trump was improbably elected the 45th president of the United States, a strange story began to make its way across social media. </p>
<p>At corporations and universities across the country, incipient technologies appear likely to soon obliterate the line between real and fake. Or, in the simplest of terms, advancements in audio and video technology are becoming so sophisticated that they will be able to replicate real news—real TV broadcasts, for instance, or radio interviews—in unprecedented, and truly indecipherable, ways. One research paper published last year by professors at Stanford University and the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg demonstrated how technologists can record video of someone talking and then change their facial expressions in real time. The professors’ technology could take a news clip of, say, Vladimir Putin, and alter his facial expressions in real time in hard-to-detect ways. In fact, in this video demonstrating the technology, the researchers show how they did manipulate Putin’s facial expressions and responses, among those of other people, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1534664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2017 07:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1534664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Cathcart / Facebook: 	
Facebook&#039;s Trending topics will show regional, not personalized, stories moving forward, publisher headline and name under each topic, more  —  Today we&#039;re announcing three updates to Trending, a feature that shows people popular topics being discussed on Facebook that they might not see in their News Feed:

Continuing Our Updates to Trending
http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/01/continuing-our-updates-to-trending/

Publisher Headlines
In order to provide people with more context on what is trending on Facebook, we will now display a headline from a publisher’s article about that topic. This was the most requested feature addition since the last update we made to Trending in August. 

Everyone in the same region sees the same topics
Lastly, the list of which topics are trending on Facebook will no longer be personalized based on someone’s interests. Everyone in the same region will see the same topics. This is designed to help make sure people don’t miss important topics being discussed on Facebook that might not show up in their News Feed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Cathcart / Facebook:<br />
Facebook&#8217;s Trending topics will show regional, not personalized, stories moving forward, publisher headline and name under each topic, more  —  Today we&#8217;re announcing three updates to Trending, a feature that shows people popular topics being discussed on Facebook that they might not see in their News Feed:</p>
<p>Continuing Our Updates to Trending<br />
<a href="http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/01/continuing-our-updates-to-trending/" rel="nofollow">http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/01/continuing-our-updates-to-trending/</a></p>
<p>Publisher Headlines<br />
In order to provide people with more context on what is trending on Facebook, we will now display a headline from a publisher’s article about that topic. This was the most requested feature addition since the last update we made to Trending in August. </p>
<p>Everyone in the same region sees the same topics<br />
Lastly, the list of which topics are trending on Facebook will no longer be personalized based on someone’s interests. Everyone in the same region will see the same topics. This is designed to help make sure people don’t miss important topics being discussed on Facebook that might not show up in their News Feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1534209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1534209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Stelter / CNNMoney:
White House press secretary Sean Spicer attacks media for accurately reporting inauguration crowds, warning “we&#039;re going to hold the press accountable”

White House press secretary attacks media for accurately reporting inauguration crowds
http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/21/media/sean-spicer-press-secretary-statement/index.html?sr=twCNN012117ean-spicer-press-secretary-statement/

the comment came after a long digression about how many people had shown up to watch Trump be sworn in as president.

&quot;This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period,&quot; Spicer said, contradicting all available data.

Aerial photos have indicated that former president Barack Obama&#039;s first inauguration attracted a much larger crowd. Nielsen ratings show that Obama also had a bigger television audience. 

His statement included several specific misstatements of fact

 Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post said Spicer&#039;s assertion about &quot;what you guys should be writing&quot; was &quot;chilling.&quot;

Reactions were overwhelmingly negative, and not just from journalists. 

Spicer&#039;s statement came two hours after Trump spoke at CIA headquarters and described his &quot;running war with the media.&quot; Trump spent several minutes of that speech complaining about news coverage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Stelter / CNNMoney:<br />
White House press secretary Sean Spicer attacks media for accurately reporting inauguration crowds, warning “we&#8217;re going to hold the press accountable”</p>
<p>White House press secretary attacks media for accurately reporting inauguration crowds<br />
<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/21/media/sean-spicer-press-secretary-statement/index.html?sr=twCNN012117ean-spicer-press-secretary-statement/" rel="nofollow">http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/21/media/sean-spicer-press-secretary-statement/index.html?sr=twCNN012117ean-spicer-press-secretary-statement/</a></p>
<p>the comment came after a long digression about how many people had shown up to watch Trump be sworn in as president.</p>
<p>&#8220;This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period,&#8221; Spicer said, contradicting all available data.</p>
<p>Aerial photos have indicated that former president Barack Obama&#8217;s first inauguration attracted a much larger crowd. Nielsen ratings show that Obama also had a bigger television audience. </p>
<p>His statement included several specific misstatements of fact</p>
<p> Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post said Spicer&#8217;s assertion about &#8220;what you guys should be writing&#8221; was &#8220;chilling.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reactions were overwhelmingly negative, and not just from journalists. </p>
<p>Spicer&#8217;s statement came two hours after Trump spoke at CIA headquarters and described his &#8220;running war with the media.&#8221; Trump spent several minutes of that speech complaining about news coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1534123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 14:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1534123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columbia Journalism Review:
How newsrooms are gearing up to cover the Trump presidency and why media is entering one of its most challenging periods of the past century  —  Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Columbus, Ohio, on March 1, 2016.  (Ty Wright / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The coming storm for journalism under Trump
http://www.cjr.org/special_report/trump_media_journalism_washington_press.php

For a president who became synonymous with the abuse of executive power, Richard Nixon’s public exchanges with adversarial reporters seem quaint by today’s standards. Take Nixon’s March 1974 news conference in Houston, hosted before a convention for the National Association of Broadcasters.

“With Nixon, lying was very much with the intent to deceive—he lied through his teeth that he didn’t lead a criminal conspiracy from the White House,” says David Greenberg, a Rutgers University professor who chronicled presidential PR machines in Republic of Spin. “Trump is not quite the biggest liar [to be president], but he is, in a way, the most open and nonchalant about it. He’ll comfortably lie about something that’s so obviously false. It’s almost like, is it a lie if there isn’t the intent to deceive or expectation to deceive?”

Whereas all modern presidents have spun information—even lied—the reality TV star actively obstructs a fact-based public debate like no other before him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Columbia Journalism Review:<br />
How newsrooms are gearing up to cover the Trump presidency and why media is entering one of its most challenging periods of the past century  —  Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Columbus, Ohio, on March 1, 2016.  (Ty Wright / Bloomberg via Getty Images)</p>
<p>The coming storm for journalism under Trump<br />
<a href="http://www.cjr.org/special_report/trump_media_journalism_washington_press.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.cjr.org/special_report/trump_media_journalism_washington_press.php</a></p>
<p>For a president who became synonymous with the abuse of executive power, Richard Nixon’s public exchanges with adversarial reporters seem quaint by today’s standards. Take Nixon’s March 1974 news conference in Houston, hosted before a convention for the National Association of Broadcasters.</p>
<p>“With Nixon, lying was very much with the intent to deceive—he lied through his teeth that he didn’t lead a criminal conspiracy from the White House,” says David Greenberg, a Rutgers University professor who chronicled presidential PR machines in Republic of Spin. “Trump is not quite the biggest liar [to be president], but he is, in a way, the most open and nonchalant about it. He’ll comfortably lie about something that’s so obviously false. It’s almost like, is it a lie if there isn’t the intent to deceive or expectation to deceive?”</p>
<p>Whereas all modern presidents have spun information—even lied—the reality TV star actively obstructs a fact-based public debate like no other before him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2014/11/22/old-media-and-new-media-part-2/comment-page-18/#comment-1534019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=27860#comment-1534019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Massing / The Nation:
To understand what&#039;s driving Trump&#039;s supporters, editors need to create a series of new beats focusing on religion, blue-collar workers, poverty, and more  —  

How to Do Journalism in Trump’s America
To understand what’s driving his supporters, editors need to create a series of new beats.
https://www.thenation.com/article/how-to-do-journalism-in-trumps-america/

After Donald Trump’s victory, a debate broke out among journalists about where they should focus their attention during his presidency: on the Trump administration itself, with its mogul-rich cabinet, gross conflicts of interest, and swamp of ethical questions? Or on the American heartland, which was so overlooked during the campaign and whose decisive support for Trump caught so many news organizations by surprise?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Massing / The Nation:<br />
To understand what&#8217;s driving Trump&#8217;s supporters, editors need to create a series of new beats focusing on religion, blue-collar workers, poverty, and more  —  </p>
<p>How to Do Journalism in Trump’s America<br />
To understand what’s driving his supporters, editors need to create a series of new beats.<br />
<a href="https://www.thenation.com/article/how-to-do-journalism-in-trumps-america/" rel="nofollow">https://www.thenation.com/article/how-to-do-journalism-in-trumps-america/</a></p>
<p>After Donald Trump’s victory, a debate broke out among journalists about where they should focus their attention during his presidency: on the Trump administration itself, with its mogul-rich cabinet, gross conflicts of interest, and swamp of ethical questions? Or on the American heartland, which was so overlooked during the campaign and whose decisive support for Trump caught so many news organizations by surprise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
