<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lauterbach debugger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2015/03/10/lauterbach-debugger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2015/03/10/lauterbach-debugger/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 18:35:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2015/03/10/lauterbach-debugger/comment-page-1/#comment-1530407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 06:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=30566#comment-1530407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your feedback.

Thank you for your feedback. 

I quess that there is possibility the demo could have went somewhat wrong. 
I have had some hands-on testing on LauterBach (hour or two with instructor) many many years ago 
on some different processor system and other OS, and at that time things worked much better 
than in that new demo. 

I have use GDB (both local and remote) to debug software running on PowerPC and ARM processors. 
And used some other hardware/software debuggers for certain processors over years...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your feedback.</p>
<p>Thank you for your feedback. </p>
<p>I quess that there is possibility the demo could have went somewhat wrong.<br />
I have had some hands-on testing on LauterBach (hour or two with instructor) many many years ago<br />
on some different processor system and other OS, and at that time things worked much better<br />
than in that new demo. </p>
<p>I have use GDB (both local and remote) to debug software running on PowerPC and ARM processors.<br />
And used some other hardware/software debuggers for certain processors over years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Reyes</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2015/03/10/lauterbach-debugger/comment-page-1/#comment-1530359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo Reyes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=30566#comment-1530359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;software UI like things 10-15 years back and hardware 20 years back in time&quot; this debugging tool set is intended for embedded targets, so efficiency is what matters not a beautiful GUI. &quot;It is considered to be high-end debugger&quot; this is true, for debugging embedded targets there is no more powerful debugger available. Signum could be an option but not that complete &quot;Does not feel like reliable&quot; have you used other debuggers out there for debugging PowerPC or ARM processors for example?. &quot;Has the product quality gone down over years or some hardware problem in this demo&quot; I work with this tools on a daily basis and can tell you there is no more reliable debugger out there, but the tool is very advanced and not easy to use so this demo very probably went wrong. The tool is a product and as such it needs maintenance, it is not bug free but nonetheless it is still the most powerful HW/SW debugging tool set available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;software UI like things 10-15 years back and hardware 20 years back in time&#8221; this debugging tool set is intended for embedded targets, so efficiency is what matters not a beautiful GUI. &#8220;It is considered to be high-end debugger&#8221; this is true, for debugging embedded targets there is no more powerful debugger available. Signum could be an option but not that complete &#8220;Does not feel like reliable&#8221; have you used other debuggers out there for debugging PowerPC or ARM processors for example?. &#8220;Has the product quality gone down over years or some hardware problem in this demo&#8221; I work with this tools on a daily basis and can tell you there is no more reliable debugger out there, but the tool is very advanced and not easy to use so this demo very probably went wrong. The tool is a product and as such it needs maintenance, it is not bug free but nonetheless it is still the most powerful HW/SW debugging tool set available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
