<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of Javascript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2015/05/16/the-future-of-javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2015/05/16/the-future-of-javascript/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:24:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2015/05/16/the-future-of-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-1416624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 09:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=31898#comment-1416624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WebAssembly and the Future of JavaScript
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/15/07/08/1921251/webassembly-and-the-future-of-javascript

WebAssembly is the next stage in the evolution of client-side scripting. In theory, it will improve on JavaScript&#039;s speed. That&#039;s not to say that JavaScript is a slowpoke: Incremental speed improvements have included the rollout of asm.js (an optimized subset) in 2013. But WebAssembly—while not a replacement for JavaScript—is intended as a &quot;cure&quot; for a variety of issues where JavaScript isn&#039;t always a perfect fit, including video editing, encryption, peer-to-peer, and more.

 will WebAssembly actually become something big, or is it ultimately doomed to suffer the fate of other hyped JavaScript-related platforms

Is WebAssembly the Future of JavaScript?
http://insights.dice.com/2015/07/08/is-webassembly-the-future-of-javascript/?CMPID=AF_SD_UP_JS_AV_OG_DNA_]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WebAssembly and the Future of JavaScript<br />
<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/15/07/08/1921251/webassembly-and-the-future-of-javascript" rel="nofollow">http://developers.slashdot.org/story/15/07/08/1921251/webassembly-and-the-future-of-javascript</a></p>
<p>WebAssembly is the next stage in the evolution of client-side scripting. In theory, it will improve on JavaScript&#8217;s speed. That&#8217;s not to say that JavaScript is a slowpoke: Incremental speed improvements have included the rollout of asm.js (an optimized subset) in 2013. But WebAssembly—while not a replacement for JavaScript—is intended as a &#8220;cure&#8221; for a variety of issues where JavaScript isn&#8217;t always a perfect fit, including video editing, encryption, peer-to-peer, and more.</p>
<p> will WebAssembly actually become something big, or is it ultimately doomed to suffer the fate of other hyped JavaScript-related platforms</p>
<p>Is WebAssembly the Future of JavaScript?<br />
<a href="http://insights.dice.com/2015/07/08/is-webassembly-the-future-of-javascript/?CMPID=AF_SD_UP_JS_AV_OG_DNA_" rel="nofollow">http://insights.dice.com/2015/07/08/is-webassembly-the-future-of-javascript/?CMPID=AF_SD_UP_JS_AV_OG_DNA_</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
