<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fourth Industrial Revolution: Automation could replace 5 million jobs by 2020 &#8211; Interesting Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/01/19/fourth-industrial-revolution-automation-could-replace-5-million-jobs-by-2020-interesting-engineering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/01/19/fourth-industrial-revolution-automation-could-replace-5-million-jobs-by-2020-interesting-engineering/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 22:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/01/19/fourth-industrial-revolution-automation-could-replace-5-million-jobs-by-2020-interesting-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-1589245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=38139#comment-1589245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economist:
OECD working paper: 14% of jobs across 32 developed countries are highly vulnerable to automation and 32% are vulnerable, equaling ~210M jobs in total

A study finds nearly half of jobs are vulnerable to automation
That could free people to pursue more interesting careers
https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2018/04/daily-chart-15

A WAVE of automation anxiety has hit the West. Just try typing “Will machines…” into Google. An algorithm offers to complete the sentence with differing degrees of disquiet: “...take my job?”; “...take all jobs?”; “...replace humans?”; “...take over the world?” 

Job-grabbing robots are no longer science fiction. In 2013 Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne of Oxford University used—what else?—a machine-learning algorithm to assess how easily 702 different kinds of job in America could be automated. They concluded that fully 47% could be done by machines “over the next decade or two”.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economist:<br />
OECD working paper: 14% of jobs across 32 developed countries are highly vulnerable to automation and 32% are vulnerable, equaling ~210M jobs in total</p>
<p>A study finds nearly half of jobs are vulnerable to automation<br />
That could free people to pursue more interesting careers<br />
<a href="https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2018/04/daily-chart-15" rel="nofollow">https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2018/04/daily-chart-15</a></p>
<p>A WAVE of automation anxiety has hit the West. Just try typing “Will machines…” into Google. An algorithm offers to complete the sentence with differing degrees of disquiet: “&#8230;take my job?”; “&#8230;take all jobs?”; “&#8230;replace humans?”; “&#8230;take over the world?” </p>
<p>Job-grabbing robots are no longer science fiction. In 2013 Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne of Oxford University used—what else?—a machine-learning algorithm to assess how easily 702 different kinds of job in America could be automated. They concluded that fully 47% could be done by machines “over the next decade or two”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
