<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Impedance and impedance matching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1874351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 13:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1874351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://hackaday.com/2026/03/28/watch-electricity-slosh-visualizing-impedance-matching/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://hackaday.com/2026/03/28/watch-electricity-slosh-visualizing-impedance-matching/" rel="nofollow">https://hackaday.com/2026/03/28/watch-electricity-slosh-visualizing-impedance-matching/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1871423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 13:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1871423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[600-ohm headphones are basically a legacy of telecom engineering that carried into pro audio and high-end hi-fi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>600-ohm headphones are basically a legacy of telecom engineering that carried into pro audio and high-end hi-fi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1871422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 13:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1871422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twin cable
122 ohms sounds about right. It&#039;s similar to zip cord. Generally the farther apart the higher the impedance. 300 ohm is 0.5 inch; 450 ohm is about an inch and 600 ohm is more than that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twin cable<br />
122 ohms sounds about right. It&#8217;s similar to zip cord. Generally the farther apart the higher the impedance. 300 ohm is 0.5 inch; 450 ohm is about an inch and 600 ohm is more than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1848788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1848788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens if you use 75 ohm coax instead of 50 ohm?
Every time a 50 and 75 Ohm Impedance mismatch occurs, about 5% of the signal is lost. These losses add up and can eventually degrade the signal to the point that it is unrecoverable or distorted.

https://cablesondemand.com/blog/whats-the-difference-between-50-ohm-and-75-ohm-coaxial-cable/#:~:text=Every%20time%20a%2050%20and,it%20is%20unrecoverable%20or%20distorted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens if you use 75 ohm coax instead of 50 ohm?<br />
Every time a 50 and 75 Ohm Impedance mismatch occurs, about 5% of the signal is lost. These losses add up and can eventually degrade the signal to the point that it is unrecoverable or distorted.</p>
<p><a href="https://cablesondemand.com/blog/whats-the-difference-between-50-ohm-and-75-ohm-coaxial-cable/#:~:text=Every%20time%20a%2050%20and,it%20is%20unrecoverable%20or%20distorted" rel="nofollow">https://cablesondemand.com/blog/whats-the-difference-between-50-ohm-and-75-ohm-coaxial-cable/#:~:text=Every%20time%20a%2050%20and,it%20is%20unrecoverable%20or%20distorted</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1844060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2025 10:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1844060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[for any modern amplifier. Modern solid state audio amplifiers have typically output impedance of a small fraction of ohm. The amplifier impedance rating is minimum impedance that the amplifier can handle. 
Things are slightly different in some tube amplifier. For audio power amplifiers the output impedance almost never matches the speaker listed impedance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for any modern amplifier. Modern solid state audio amplifiers have typically output impedance of a small fraction of ohm. The amplifier impedance rating is minimum impedance that the amplifier can handle.<br />
Things are slightly different in some tube amplifier. For audio power amplifiers the output impedance almost never matches the speaker listed impedance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1830401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1830401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/analog/article/21167514/electronic-design-impedance-matching-basics-smith-charts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/analog/article/21167514/electronic-design-impedance-matching-basics-smith-charts" rel="nofollow">https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/analog/article/21167514/electronic-design-impedance-matching-basics-smith-charts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1825928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1825928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.pasternack.com/t-calculator-coax-cutoff.aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.pasternack.com/t-calculator-coax-cutoff.aspx" rel="nofollow">https://www.pasternack.com/t-calculator-coax-cutoff.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1825927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1825927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominal_impedance]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominal_impedance" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominal_impedance</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1825926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1825926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://fi.farnell.com/twisted-pair-impedance-laskin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://fi.farnell.com/twisted-pair-impedance-laskin" rel="nofollow">https://fi.farnell.com/twisted-pair-impedance-laskin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/02/20/impedance-and-impedance-matching/comment-page-2/#comment-1825925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=35205#comment-1825925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.avnet.com/wps/portal/us/solutions/product-and-solutions-design/design-hub/calculators/twisted-pair-impedance/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.avnet.com/wps/portal/us/solutions/product-and-solutions-design/design-hub/calculators/twisted-pair-impedance/" rel="nofollow">https://www.avnet.com/wps/portal/us/solutions/product-and-solutions-design/design-hub/calculators/twisted-pair-impedance/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
