<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu will soon end support to 32-bit PCs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/03/ubuntu-will-soon-end-support-to-32-bit-pcs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/03/ubuntu-will-soon-end-support-to-32-bit-pcs/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 10:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/03/ubuntu-will-soon-end-support-to-32-bit-pcs/comment-page-1/#comment-1498370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43468#comment-1498370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Linux letting go: 32-bit builds on the way out
Ubuntu joins calls for users to let go of i386 versions
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/

Major Linux distributions are in agreement: it&#039;s time to stop developing new versions for 32-bit processors.

Simply: it&#039;s a waste of time, both to create the 32-bit port, and to keep 32-bit hardware around to test it on.

At the end of June, Ubuntu developer Dimitri Ledkov chipped into the debate with this mailing list post, saying bluntly that 32-bit ports are a waste of resources.

“Building i386 images is not &#039;for free&#039;, it comes at the cost of utilising our build farm, QA and validation time. Whilst we have scalable build-farms, i386 still requires all packages, autopackage tests, and ISOs to be revalidated across our infrastructure.”

His proposal is that Ubuntu version 18.10 would be 64-bit-only, and if users desperately need to run 32-bit legacy applications, the&#039;ll have to do so in containers or virtual machines.

Even that timeline would mean 32-bit versions will go very gently into their good night: i386 would be sunsetted as the host architecture in April 2021, and legacy application security support would continue until April 2023.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux letting go: 32-bit builds on the way out<br />
Ubuntu joins calls for users to let go of i386 versions<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/</a></p>
<p>Major Linux distributions are in agreement: it&#8217;s time to stop developing new versions for 32-bit processors.</p>
<p>Simply: it&#8217;s a waste of time, both to create the 32-bit port, and to keep 32-bit hardware around to test it on.</p>
<p>At the end of June, Ubuntu developer Dimitri Ledkov chipped into the debate with this mailing list post, saying bluntly that 32-bit ports are a waste of resources.</p>
<p>“Building i386 images is not &#8216;for free&#8217;, it comes at the cost of utilising our build farm, QA and validation time. Whilst we have scalable build-farms, i386 still requires all packages, autopackage tests, and ISOs to be revalidated across our infrastructure.”</p>
<p>His proposal is that Ubuntu version 18.10 would be 64-bit-only, and if users desperately need to run 32-bit legacy applications, the&#8217;ll have to do so in containers or virtual machines.</p>
<p>Even that timeline would mean 32-bit versions will go very gently into their good night: i386 would be sunsetted as the host architecture in April 2021, and legacy application security support would continue until April 2023.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
