<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fight for the &#8220;Right to Repair&#8221; </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 10:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1703075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2021 04:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1703075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tractor-Hacking Farmers Take on John Deere
https://www.freethink.com/shows/coded/season-3/tractor-hacking

These tractor-hacking farmers are fighting for the right to repair their own equipment.

Tractor hacking is a fast-growing trend in the farming community — but it&#039;s not outsiders breaking in. Farmers themselves are hacking their own equipment for reasons that go far beyond agriculture. They&#039;re part of a larger movement against big-name companies that are withholding the right to make equipment repairs. 

While farming is an ancient practice, farmers are hardly immune to technological advancements. In fact, farmers are among the most susceptible groups when it comes to software propriety, as much of the equipment used on farms requires consistent maintenance.

Companies like John Deere have made it impossible for farmers to perform &quot;unauthorized&quot; repairs on their equipment, forcing tractor owners into using the parent company for repairs, which can be more costly.

Farmers view this corporate strategy as an infringement on their sovereignty to make strategic decisions about their hard assets. In some cases, this system can function as a threat to their livelihood, should they encounter an ill-timed tractor breakdown.

That&#039;s why many farmers have turned to tractor hacking, in an attempt to return the right to repair back to the consumer rather than large corporations.

They’re part of a larger movement against big-name companies that are withholding the right to make equipment repairs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tractor-Hacking Farmers Take on John Deere<br />
<a href="https://www.freethink.com/shows/coded/season-3/tractor-hacking" rel="nofollow">https://www.freethink.com/shows/coded/season-3/tractor-hacking</a></p>
<p>These tractor-hacking farmers are fighting for the right to repair their own equipment.</p>
<p>Tractor hacking is a fast-growing trend in the farming community — but it&#8217;s not outsiders breaking in. Farmers themselves are hacking their own equipment for reasons that go far beyond agriculture. They&#8217;re part of a larger movement against big-name companies that are withholding the right to make equipment repairs. </p>
<p>While farming is an ancient practice, farmers are hardly immune to technological advancements. In fact, farmers are among the most susceptible groups when it comes to software propriety, as much of the equipment used on farms requires consistent maintenance.</p>
<p>Companies like John Deere have made it impossible for farmers to perform &#8220;unauthorized&#8221; repairs on their equipment, forcing tractor owners into using the parent company for repairs, which can be more costly.</p>
<p>Farmers view this corporate strategy as an infringement on their sovereignty to make strategic decisions about their hard assets. In some cases, this system can function as a threat to their livelihood, should they encounter an ill-timed tractor breakdown.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why many farmers have turned to tractor hacking, in an attempt to return the right to repair back to the consumer rather than large corporations.</p>
<p>They’re part of a larger movement against big-name companies that are withholding the right to make equipment repairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1699336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2020 15:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1699336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.repair.org/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.repair.org/" rel="nofollow">https://www.repair.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1698612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1698612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a legitimate reason for hacking. When you can&#039;t even fix or modify your own hardware after your bought it. 

Farmers Are Hacking Their Tractors Because of a Repair Ban
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EPYy_g8NzmI

Julkaistu 3.3.2020

As of 2020, no right to repair law has passed in the US. But more than 20 states are considering legislation similar to Nebraska&#039;s, and Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have both supported national right to repair legislation for farmers.

When it comes to repair, farmers have always been self reliant. But the modernization of tractors and other farm equipment over the past few decades has left most farmers in the dust thanks to diagnostic software that large manufacturers hold a monopoly over.  

In this episode of State of Repair, we go to Nebraska to talk to the farmers and mechanics who are fighting large manufacturers like John Deere for the right to access the diagnostic software they need to repair their tractors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a legitimate reason for hacking. When you can&#8217;t even fix or modify your own hardware after your bought it. </p>
<p>Farmers Are Hacking Their Tractors Because of a Repair Ban<br />
<a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EPYy_g8NzmI" rel="nofollow">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EPYy_g8NzmI</a></p>
<p>Julkaistu 3.3.2020</p>
<p>As of 2020, no right to repair law has passed in the US. But more than 20 states are considering legislation similar to Nebraska&#8217;s, and Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have both supported national right to repair legislation for farmers.</p>
<p>When it comes to repair, farmers have always been self reliant. But the modernization of tractors and other farm equipment over the past few decades has left most farmers in the dust thanks to diagnostic software that large manufacturers hold a monopoly over.  </p>
<p>In this episode of State of Repair, we go to Nebraska to talk to the farmers and mechanics who are fighting large manufacturers like John Deere for the right to access the diagnostic software they need to repair their tractors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1688724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 16:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1688724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farmers Fight John Deere Over Who Gets to Fix an $800,000 Tractor
The right-to-repair movement has come to the heartland, where some farmers are demanding access to the software that runs their equipment.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-03-05/farmers-fight-john-deere-over-who-gets-to-fix-an-800-000-tractor]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farmers Fight John Deere Over Who Gets to Fix an $800,000 Tractor<br />
The right-to-repair movement has come to the heartland, where some farmers are demanding access to the software that runs their equipment.<br />
<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-03-05/farmers-fight-john-deere-over-who-gets-to-fix-an-800-000-tractor" rel="nofollow">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-03-05/farmers-fight-john-deere-over-who-gets-to-fix-an-800-000-tractor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1673784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 23:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1673784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But DIY maintenance is not for everybody or appropriate for every situation. Nor does it inevitably produce greater “caring.” Results vary. Quality can suffer. While a person’s self-esteem may rise with every home improvement they carry out, the value of their home may decline as a result (because of the quality of the DIY fixes). I favor a simple rule: encourage consumers to repair if they wish but not insist on self-repair under every circumstance, and leave the option that original makers of complex devices will repair them the best (Tesla owners, take heed!)
https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/consumer-electronics/gadgets/wrong-right-to-repair]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But DIY maintenance is not for everybody or appropriate for every situation. Nor does it inevitably produce greater “caring.” Results vary. Quality can suffer. While a person’s self-esteem may rise with every home improvement they carry out, the value of their home may decline as a result (because of the quality of the DIY fixes). I favor a simple rule: encourage consumers to repair if they wish but not insist on self-repair under every circumstance, and leave the option that original makers of complex devices will repair them the best (Tesla owners, take heed!)<br />
<a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/consumer-electronics/gadgets/wrong-right-to-repair" rel="nofollow">https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/consumer-electronics/gadgets/wrong-right-to-repair</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1673783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 23:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1673783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than burden individuals with enhanced rights and duties for repair and maintenance of our devices, G. Pascal Zachary suggests we demand that makers of digitally-controlled stuff make repairs at fair prices, quickly and reliably.

What the Right To Repair Movement Gets Wrong
https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/consumer-electronics/gadgets/wrong-right-to-repair

Today repair remains an option, one that makers want to monopolize or eliminate. Apple, the world’s most valuable company, is the worst offender, effectively forbidding owners to repair or maintain their smart phones. Not even the battery is replaceable by an owner. Forbidden also are repairs by owners of cracked screens. Such brazen actions void Apple’s warranty.

Seated at my table, working with tiny tools, he swapped my broken screen for a new one. I slipped him $90 in cash, and he left.

Sound tawdry? The nationwide campaign, led by Repair.Org, agrees, which is why Repair.Org supports legislation in at least 20 states to promote “your right to repair,” by requiring manufacturers “to share the information necessary for repair.”

Long before the advent of the repair campaign, and a related movement called the Maintainers, there were loud critics of “planned obsolescence.” During Depression-era America, an influential book published 1932 advocated “creative waste”—the idea that throwing things away and buying new things can fuel a strong economy. 

Manufacturers purposely made stuff that broke or wore out, so consumers would have to buy the stuff again. Echoes of this practice persist. In shopping for new tires, for instance, drivers pay more for those “rated” to last longer.

The big threat to devices today isn’t failure, but rather “creative destruction,” or the new advent of new and improved stuff. Who needs to think about repairs when we are dazzled by the latest “upgrade.”]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than burden individuals with enhanced rights and duties for repair and maintenance of our devices, G. Pascal Zachary suggests we demand that makers of digitally-controlled stuff make repairs at fair prices, quickly and reliably.</p>
<p>What the Right To Repair Movement Gets Wrong<br />
<a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/consumer-electronics/gadgets/wrong-right-to-repair" rel="nofollow">https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/consumer-electronics/gadgets/wrong-right-to-repair</a></p>
<p>Today repair remains an option, one that makers want to monopolize or eliminate. Apple, the world’s most valuable company, is the worst offender, effectively forbidding owners to repair or maintain their smart phones. Not even the battery is replaceable by an owner. Forbidden also are repairs by owners of cracked screens. Such brazen actions void Apple’s warranty.</p>
<p>Seated at my table, working with tiny tools, he swapped my broken screen for a new one. I slipped him $90 in cash, and he left.</p>
<p>Sound tawdry? The nationwide campaign, led by Repair.Org, agrees, which is why Repair.Org supports legislation in at least 20 states to promote “your right to repair,” by requiring manufacturers “to share the information necessary for repair.”</p>
<p>Long before the advent of the repair campaign, and a related movement called the Maintainers, there were loud critics of “planned obsolescence.” During Depression-era America, an influential book published 1932 advocated “creative waste”—the idea that throwing things away and buying new things can fuel a strong economy. </p>
<p>Manufacturers purposely made stuff that broke or wore out, so consumers would have to buy the stuff again. Echoes of this practice persist. In shopping for new tires, for instance, drivers pay more for those “rated” to last longer.</p>
<p>The big threat to devices today isn’t failure, but rather “creative destruction,” or the new advent of new and improved stuff. Who needs to think about repairs when we are dazzled by the latest “upgrade.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1668514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1668514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CompTIA, A+ cert org lobbies AGAINST right to repair bill.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9JKRItHDME]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CompTIA, A+ cert org lobbies AGAINST right to repair bill.<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9JKRItHDME" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9JKRItHDME</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1668239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 04:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1668239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louis Rossmann Right to Repair testimony in Washington SB 5799
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&amp;v=oLIW7mQ8CI4]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis Rossmann Right to Repair testimony in Washington SB 5799<br />
<a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&#038;v=oLIW7mQ8CI4" rel="nofollow">https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&#038;v=oLIW7mQ8CI4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1667171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1667171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farmers Are Buying 40-Year-Old Tractors Because They&#039;re Actually Repairable
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/bvgx9w/farmers-are-buying-40-year-old-tractors-because-theyre-actually-repairable

John Deere makes it difficult to repair its new tractors without specialized software, so an increasing number of farmers are buying older models.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farmers Are Buying 40-Year-Old Tractors Because They&#8217;re Actually Repairable<br />
<a href="https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/bvgx9w/farmers-are-buying-40-year-old-tractors-because-theyre-actually-repairable" rel="nofollow">https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/bvgx9w/farmers-are-buying-40-year-old-tractors-because-theyre-actually-repairable</a></p>
<p>John Deere makes it difficult to repair its new tractors without specialized software, so an increasing number of farmers are buying older models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2016/07/19/the-fight-for-the-right-to-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-1667101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 20:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=43959#comment-1667101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[an DMCA exception for automotive hacking...

https://www.aftermarketsuppliers.org/news/dmca-exemptions-allow-access-independent-repair-providers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an DMCA exception for automotive hacking&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.aftermarketsuppliers.org/news/dmca-exemptions-allow-access-independent-repair-providers" rel="nofollow">https://www.aftermarketsuppliers.org/news/dmca-exemptions-allow-access-independent-repair-providers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
