<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shield Current Induced Noise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1868148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 04:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1868148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.ranecommercial.com/legacy/note110.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ranecommercial.com/legacy/note110.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.ranecommercial.com/legacy/note110.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1868063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1868063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.edn.com/simulation-helps-deal-with-ground-offset-during-reliability-testing/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.edn.com/simulation-helps-deal-with-ground-offset-during-reliability-testing/" rel="nofollow">https://www.edn.com/simulation-helps-deal-with-ground-offset-during-reliability-testing/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1750536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 16:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1750536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.emcstandards.co.uk/cable-shield-grounded-at-one-end-only]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.emcstandards.co.uk/cable-shield-grounded-at-one-end-only" rel="nofollow">https://www.emcstandards.co.uk/cable-shield-grounded-at-one-end-only</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1718222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 04:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1718222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I all else has been attempted, a possible common mode rejection issue could be the source. Below is essential reading for all DIY, repair techs and system installers. https://web.mit.edu/jhawk/tmp/p/EST016_Ground_Loops_handout.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I all else has been attempted, a possible common mode rejection issue could be the source. Below is essential reading for all DIY, repair techs and system installers. <a href="https://web.mit.edu/jhawk/tmp/p/EST016_Ground_Loops_handout.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://web.mit.edu/jhawk/tmp/p/EST016_Ground_Loops_handout.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1716519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1716519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to find and fix hum in 3 easy steps
https://www.psaudio.com/ps-how/how-to-find-and-fix-hum/

If your stereo or video system has a hum or buzz coming from the loudspeakers, there are several easy steps you can take to discover what the cause and cure will be.

If you need a more extensive procedure, click here for the extended version.

First, you should determine the type of hum you are dealing with. There are two basic types: 120Hz buzz, typically caused by ground loops, and 60Hz hum, typically a result of poor shielding, cable problems, or close proximity to strong magnetic fields.

To determine which of these you have, listen to the two examples.

60Hz hum caused by close proximity to other equipment or cables problems:

120Hz hum/buzz typical of ground loop problems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to find and fix hum in 3 easy steps<br />
<a href="https://www.psaudio.com/ps-how/how-to-find-and-fix-hum/" rel="nofollow">https://www.psaudio.com/ps-how/how-to-find-and-fix-hum/</a></p>
<p>If your stereo or video system has a hum or buzz coming from the loudspeakers, there are several easy steps you can take to discover what the cause and cure will be.</p>
<p>If you need a more extensive procedure, click here for the extended version.</p>
<p>First, you should determine the type of hum you are dealing with. There are two basic types: 120Hz buzz, typically caused by ground loops, and 60Hz hum, typically a result of poor shielding, cable problems, or close proximity to strong magnetic fields.</p>
<p>To determine which of these you have, listen to the two examples.</p>
<p>60Hz hum caused by close proximity to other equipment or cables problems:</p>
<p>120Hz hum/buzz typical of ground loop problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1716518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1716518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to get rid of hum and eliminate other noises from your audio and video systems
Don&#039;t let buzz, hum, or hiss ruin your AV experience. We&#039;ll show you how to solve common electrical faults so you can ditch the noise.
https://www.techhive.com/article/3063590/how-to-get-rid-of-hum-and-eliminate-other-noises-from-your-audio-and-video-systems.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to get rid of hum and eliminate other noises from your audio and video systems<br />
Don&#8217;t let buzz, hum, or hiss ruin your AV experience. We&#8217;ll show you how to solve common electrical faults so you can ditch the noise.<br />
<a href="https://www.techhive.com/article/3063590/how-to-get-rid-of-hum-and-eliminate-other-noises-from-your-audio-and-video-systems.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.techhive.com/article/3063590/how-to-get-rid-of-hum-and-eliminate-other-noises-from-your-audio-and-video-systems.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1716517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1716517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bah! The Subwoofer Hum Bug --
and How to Stop It
https://www.bluejeanscable.com/articles/subwoofer-hum.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah! The Subwoofer Hum Bug &#8211;<br />
and How to Stop It<br />
<a href="https://www.bluejeanscable.com/articles/subwoofer-hum.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.bluejeanscable.com/articles/subwoofer-hum.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1711101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 04:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1711101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chad Chase depending on the case ground loop can show as 50 / 60 Hz hum or 100 / 120 Hz buzz. 
Also 150 / 180 Hz and 300 / 360 Hz fundamentals or components are well possible (especially when you have amplifier racks and/or light dimmers powered from three phase power in your system).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad Chase depending on the case ground loop can show as 50 / 60 Hz hum or 100 / 120 Hz buzz.<br />
Also 150 / 180 Hz and 300 / 360 Hz fundamentals or components are well possible (especially when you have amplifier racks and/or light dimmers powered from three phase power in your system).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1685466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1685466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Case study: Why did an industrial controller fail the radiated immunity #test at numerous frequency bands? #TBT #interference #EMC #CableShield

Case study: radiated interference to industrial controller
https://www.edn.com/case-study-radiated-interference-to-industrial-controller/?utm_content=buffer03cba&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=edn_facebook&amp;utm_campaign=buffer

As an EMC consultant, I seem to be running into more and more issues with ESD and radiated susceptibility. I believe this is due to the fact noise margins are gradually being reduced as supply voltages move from 5 to 3.3 to 1.8 to 1.2 volts. In addition, IC chips are scaling down in size, and quite frankly, designers still don’t understand basic EMC design principles, as I wrote up recently in an editorial for Interference Technology’s 2014 Test &amp; Design Guide

Generally, the first thing I like to do is to sniff around with a near field probe and current probe to get a feel for any radiated emission issues. Finding nothing major, the project engineer demonstrated how he could affect the controller using just a Family Radio Service (FRS) walkie talkie from about 10 feet away. I recently measured a typical FRS radio at a 1m test distance and it read about 2V/m. Using Equation 1, at 3m (about 10 feet), we’re talking just a 1.3 V/m field strength, where I’m assuming the actual power output from the FRS radio is 0.25W, the antenna gain is 0.7 and the distance is 3m.

We actually performed most of the testing using that FRS radio. Initially, though, the resolution using the radio was too coarse, so a near field probe was connected to an RF generator, tuning it to one of the failing frequency bands (Reference 6). By probing around, we narrowed the issue down to one of several cables running through a mechanical arm on the machine.

A shielded box with several cables running through grommets. Penetrating a shield with a cable without terminating the shield allows RF interference into the enclosure.

we discovered the designer had failed to connect the cable shield! Once the cable shield was bonded to the chassis structure at both ends, the controller was completely immune to RF signals.

It’s my experience that many designers seem unsure how and where to connect cable shields. I’m simplifying somewhat, but connecting the shield at one end provides a good E-field shield. Connecting it at both ends (to the same structure) provides a good H-field shield. Most digital circuitry relies on low impedance, low voltage switched currents. Therefore, it’s more important to shield for the resulting H-fields. On the other hand, things like switch mode power supplies utilize high impedance with switched high voltages and so E-field shielding is a practical solution. Additionally, connecting each end of the shield to two differing potentials – for example, one end to digital return and one end to chassis – can introduce a potential difference which can inject high frequency switching noise into the signal wires.

There’s an additional point to be made regarding cable shields and that is the type and quality of the shielding material. Some less expensive cables use loosely formed shielding, with distributed gaps along the length. These should be avoided, due to poor shielding effectiveness. More expensive cables have a tighter weave on the shield with correspondingly better shielding performance.

In conclusion, it turns out that most of the client projects in which I’ve been involved that fail one, or more, EMI tests are due to basic design issues, such as poor routing of clock traces, penetration of I/O cables through shielded enclosures, and poor termination of cable shields. For more on shielding and bonding, check the references.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Case study: Why did an industrial controller fail the radiated immunity #test at numerous frequency bands? #TBT #interference #EMC #CableShield</p>
<p>Case study: radiated interference to industrial controller<br />
<a href="https://www.edn.com/case-study-radiated-interference-to-industrial-controller/?utm_content=buffer03cba&#038;utm_medium=social&#038;utm_source=edn_facebook&#038;utm_campaign=buffer" rel="nofollow">https://www.edn.com/case-study-radiated-interference-to-industrial-controller/?utm_content=buffer03cba&#038;utm_medium=social&#038;utm_source=edn_facebook&#038;utm_campaign=buffer</a></p>
<p>As an EMC consultant, I seem to be running into more and more issues with ESD and radiated susceptibility. I believe this is due to the fact noise margins are gradually being reduced as supply voltages move from 5 to 3.3 to 1.8 to 1.2 volts. In addition, IC chips are scaling down in size, and quite frankly, designers still don’t understand basic EMC design principles, as I wrote up recently in an editorial for Interference Technology’s 2014 Test &amp; Design Guide</p>
<p>Generally, the first thing I like to do is to sniff around with a near field probe and current probe to get a feel for any radiated emission issues. Finding nothing major, the project engineer demonstrated how he could affect the controller using just a Family Radio Service (FRS) walkie talkie from about 10 feet away. I recently measured a typical FRS radio at a 1m test distance and it read about 2V/m. Using Equation 1, at 3m (about 10 feet), we’re talking just a 1.3 V/m field strength, where I’m assuming the actual power output from the FRS radio is 0.25W, the antenna gain is 0.7 and the distance is 3m.</p>
<p>We actually performed most of the testing using that FRS radio. Initially, though, the resolution using the radio was too coarse, so a near field probe was connected to an RF generator, tuning it to one of the failing frequency bands (Reference 6). By probing around, we narrowed the issue down to one of several cables running through a mechanical arm on the machine.</p>
<p>A shielded box with several cables running through grommets. Penetrating a shield with a cable without terminating the shield allows RF interference into the enclosure.</p>
<p>we discovered the designer had failed to connect the cable shield! Once the cable shield was bonded to the chassis structure at both ends, the controller was completely immune to RF signals.</p>
<p>It’s my experience that many designers seem unsure how and where to connect cable shields. I’m simplifying somewhat, but connecting the shield at one end provides a good E-field shield. Connecting it at both ends (to the same structure) provides a good H-field shield. Most digital circuitry relies on low impedance, low voltage switched currents. Therefore, it’s more important to shield for the resulting H-fields. On the other hand, things like switch mode power supplies utilize high impedance with switched high voltages and so E-field shielding is a practical solution. Additionally, connecting each end of the shield to two differing potentials – for example, one end to digital return and one end to chassis – can introduce a potential difference which can inject high frequency switching noise into the signal wires.</p>
<p>There’s an additional point to be made regarding cable shields and that is the type and quality of the shielding material. Some less expensive cables use loosely formed shielding, with distributed gaps along the length. These should be avoided, due to poor shielding effectiveness. More expensive cables have a tighter weave on the shield with correspondingly better shielding performance.</p>
<p>In conclusion, it turns out that most of the client projects in which I’ve been involved that fail one, or more, EMI tests are due to basic design issues, such as poor routing of clock traces, penetration of I/O cables through shielded enclosures, and poor termination of cable shields. For more on shielding and bonding, check the references.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/08/03/shield-current-induced-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-1620441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=57959#comment-1620441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Audio RF interference and ground loops
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezBLZjwpops

A video tutorial on the causes and remedies of radio frequency interference and ground loop hum in the project and home recording studio.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audio RF interference and ground loops<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezBLZjwpops" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezBLZjwpops</a></p>
<p>A video tutorial on the causes and remedies of radio frequency interference and ground loop hum in the project and home recording studio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
