<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobel Prize Awarded for Detection of Gravity Waves &#8211; IEEE Spectrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/10/04/nobel-prize-awarded-for-detection-of-gravity-waves-ieee-spectrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/10/04/nobel-prize-awarded-for-detection-of-gravity-waves-ieee-spectrum/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2017/10/04/nobel-prize-awarded-for-detection-of-gravity-waves-ieee-spectrum/comment-page-1/#comment-1565445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 08:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=59924#comment-1565445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Physicists find we’re not living in a computer simulation
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/physicists-find-we-re-not-living-in-a-computer-simulation?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&amp;utm_campaign=5e937b6947-The_Download&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_997ed6f472-5e937b6947-153844985


The sci-fi trope might now be put to rest after scientists find the suggestion that reality is computer generated is in principle impossible, writes Andrew Masterson.

The finding – an unexpectedly definite one – arose from the discovery of a novel link between gravitational anomalies and computational complexity.

In a paper published in the journal Science Advances, Zohar Ringel and Dmitry Kovrizhi show that constructing a computer simulation of a particular quantum phenomenon that occurs in metals is impossible – not just practically, but in principle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Physicists find we’re not living in a computer simulation<br />
<a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/physicists-find-we-re-not-living-in-a-computer-simulation?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&#038;utm_campaign=5e937b6947-The_Download&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_term=0_997ed6f472-5e937b6947-153844985" rel="nofollow">https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/physicists-find-we-re-not-living-in-a-computer-simulation?utm_source=MIT+Technology+Review&#038;utm_campaign=5e937b6947-The_Download&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_term=0_997ed6f472-5e937b6947-153844985</a></p>
<p>The sci-fi trope might now be put to rest after scientists find the suggestion that reality is computer generated is in principle impossible, writes Andrew Masterson.</p>
<p>The finding – an unexpectedly definite one – arose from the discovery of a novel link between gravitational anomalies and computational complexity.</p>
<p>In a paper published in the journal Science Advances, Zohar Ringel and Dmitry Kovrizhi show that constructing a computer simulation of a particular quantum phenomenon that occurs in metals is impossible – not just practically, but in principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
