https://github.com/ggerganov/ggwave

AI has been around for a while now. But ever since ChatGPT came out in November 2022, what has really changed?

Sure, the AI is better at creating responses. But it’s still a language model. You tell it stuff, and it tells you stuff back.

Other than writing, coding, and creating visuals, AI can’t do much…yet.

Well, that’s not true. If you own a Tesla in the US, it can drive for you, which is actually huge. I’ve seen FSD (Full Self Driving) footage, and it’s impressive.

That’s where AI is going. Before you and I know it, AI will actually do meaningful things.

AI is going to make our lives simpler. And it’s going to change the world.

Everyone online knows this. But in the real world, people are still not using AI because most people are not familiar with the use cases.

But if you want to thrive in tomorrow’s world, you’ve got to start using AI more seriously.

”Which AI should I use?”
The main AI models are Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, or Copilot.

But I like to keep things simple.

For me, ChatGPT does the job. It was the first, it’s the biggest, and it’s still the most intuitive to use.

That doesn’t mean the others are not better at certain things. In fact, many coders prefer Claude. And that’s okay. Many AI models specialize.

ChatGPT is the perfect daily driver, though. It’s good at everything.

https://futurism.com/trump-admin-accused-ai-executive-orders?fbclid=IwY2xjawIAMyBleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHQoT60_rjdFepQ_i47aQYSYco7o6Z38hQ1y0FJx3U3oDruRo4P_ifslPBw_aem_FrWFky58BRsUe0wChQpOHA

But while the executive actions range in scope, legal experts have called attention to some curious common threads: bizarre typos, formatting errors and oddities, and stilted language — familiar artifacts that have led to speculation that those who penned them might have turned to AI for help.

Needless to say, this is all speculation. But it is based on experts’ understandings of what normal executive orders should look like from a legal perspective. We reached out to the White House to inquire about the possible use of AI to draft executive actions, but haven’t heard back.

“People use it much more than we expected.”
Fiscal Shortage
While trying its darndest to become profitable, OpenAI is still falling comically short — which, since it’s the 800-pound gorilla in the nascent AI industry, should probably give pause to its rivals both large and small.

In a post on X-formerly-Twitter, CEO Sam Altman admitted an “insane” fact: that the company is “currently losing money” on ChatGPT Pro subscriptions, which run $200 per month and give users access to its suite of products including its o1 “reasoning” model.

“People use it much more than we expected,” the cofounder wrote, later adding in response to another user that he “personally chose the price and thought we would make some money.”

Though Altman didn’t explicitly say why OpenAI is losing money on these premium subscriptions, the issue almost certainly comes down to the enormous expense of running AI infrastructure: the massive and increasing amounts of electricity needed to power the facilities that power AI, not to mention the cost of building and maintaining those data centers.

Way back in spring 2023, analyst Dylan Patel told The Information that the company was likely spending around $700,000 per day running ChatGPT, or about 36 cents per query; nowadays, a single query on the company’s most advanced models can cost a staggering $1,000.