<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Julia Reda – Showdown on upload filters and the link tax on September 12: These are the options in front of MEPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 18:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 19:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1832477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.thomann.de/blog/en/avoid-these-5-mixing-mistakes/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.thomann.de/blog/en/avoid-these-5-mixing-mistakes/" rel="nofollow">https://www.thomann.de/blog/en/avoid-these-5-mixing-mistakes/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1614103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1614103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, here’s the bit that’s scaring YouTube.

“When an online content sharing service provider performs an act of communication to the public or an act of making available to the public, it shall not be eligible for the exemption of liability provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC for unauthorized acts of communication to the public and making available to the public..[..].”

YouTube can currently avoid liability for infringing content being made available to the public as long as it removes that content once it’s made aware of its existence. Under the statements above, YouTube would have no protection. This massive liability was referenced recently by YouTube’s CEO, who warned of dire consequences.

The latest proposals detail two options – Option 1 and Option 2 – that set out requirements for cooperation between rightsholders and the consequences of not doing so.

In other words, “here’s a list of all our content and do not make it make it available to the public without obtaining an appropriate license first – or else.”

The “or else” is laid out in the subsequent paragraph of ‘Option 1’, along with potential exceptions.


Option 2

    In the absence of the authorization [from rightsholders, referenced above], Member States shall provide that an online content sharing service provider is liable for unauthorized acts of communication to the public or making available to the public 

Both Option 1 and Option 2 add potential exemptions for small platforms, consideration for the amount and type of work uploaded by users, the availability of “suitable and effective technologies” (filtering such as YouTube’s Content ID), the financial burden on a platform, and the number of copyright infringement notices received. 

In any event, both options require online sharing providers to “act expeditiously to remove or disable to access to works or other subject matter” when unauthorized content is made available and both require that providers. They must then make “best efforts to prevent their future uploads in cooperation with rightsholders.” Phrased differently, it’s a take down and stay down regime.

Source: https://torrentfreak.com/upload-filters-article-13-the-latest-eu-proposals-181120/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, here’s the bit that’s scaring YouTube.</p>
<p>“When an online content sharing service provider performs an act of communication to the public or an act of making available to the public, it shall not be eligible for the exemption of liability provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC for unauthorized acts of communication to the public and making available to the public..[..].”</p>
<p>YouTube can currently avoid liability for infringing content being made available to the public as long as it removes that content once it’s made aware of its existence. Under the statements above, YouTube would have no protection. This massive liability was referenced recently by YouTube’s CEO, who warned of dire consequences.</p>
<p>The latest proposals detail two options – Option 1 and Option 2 – that set out requirements for cooperation between rightsholders and the consequences of not doing so.</p>
<p>In other words, “here’s a list of all our content and do not make it make it available to the public without obtaining an appropriate license first – or else.”</p>
<p>The “or else” is laid out in the subsequent paragraph of ‘Option 1’, along with potential exceptions.</p>
<p>Option 2</p>
<p>    In the absence of the authorization [from rightsholders, referenced above], Member States shall provide that an online content sharing service provider is liable for unauthorized acts of communication to the public or making available to the public </p>
<p>Both Option 1 and Option 2 add potential exemptions for small platforms, consideration for the amount and type of work uploaded by users, the availability of “suitable and effective technologies” (filtering such as YouTube’s Content ID), the financial burden on a platform, and the number of copyright infringement notices received. </p>
<p>In any event, both options require online sharing providers to “act expeditiously to remove or disable to access to works or other subject matter” when unauthorized content is made available and both require that providers. They must then make “best efforts to prevent their future uploads in cooperation with rightsholders.” Phrased differently, it’s a take down and stay down regime.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://torrentfreak.com/upload-filters-article-13-the-latest-eu-proposals-181120/" rel="nofollow">https://torrentfreak.com/upload-filters-article-13-the-latest-eu-proposals-181120/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1614101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1614101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/2018/03/21/eu-wants-to-require-platforms-to-filter-uploaded-content-including-code-the-github-blog/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/2018/03/21/eu-wants-to-require-platforms-to-filter-uploaded-content-including-code-the-github-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/2018/03/21/eu-wants-to-require-platforms-to-filter-uploaded-content-including-code-the-github-blog/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1614100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1614100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/SPOLITICO-18111319020.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/SPOLITICO-18111319020.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/SPOLITICO-18111319020.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1614099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1614099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upload Filters &amp; Article 13: The Latest EU Proposals
https://torrentfreak.com/upload-filters-article-13-the-latest-eu-proposals-181120/

    By Andy on November 20, 2018
    C: 0

News

The latest proposals surrounding the controversial Article 13 indicate that upload filters - the mechanism that has been widely warned about for months - are front and center in negotiations. Sites like YouTube will be required to obtain licenses for content they make available and cooperate with rightsholders to ensure no unauthorized communications to the public, unless they want to be held liable]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upload Filters &amp; Article 13: The Latest EU Proposals<br />
<a href="https://torrentfreak.com/upload-filters-article-13-the-latest-eu-proposals-181120/" rel="nofollow">https://torrentfreak.com/upload-filters-article-13-the-latest-eu-proposals-181120/</a></p>
<p>    By Andy on November 20, 2018<br />
    C: 0</p>
<p>News</p>
<p>The latest proposals surrounding the controversial Article 13 indicate that upload filters &#8211; the mechanism that has been widely warned about for months &#8211; are front and center in negotiations. Sites like YouTube will be required to obtain licenses for content they make available and cooperate with rightsholders to ensure no unauthorized communications to the public, unless they want to be held liable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1614098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1614098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://www.tivi.fi/Kaikki_uutiset/nauti-youtubesta-kun-viela-ehdit-julki-tullut-pelatty-pykala-nayttaa-todella-pahalta-6749919]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.tivi.fi/Kaikki_uutiset/nauti-youtubesta-kun-viela-ehdit-julki-tullut-pelatty-pykala-nayttaa-todella-pahalta-6749919" rel="nofollow">https://www.tivi.fi/Kaikki_uutiset/nauti-youtubesta-kun-viela-ehdit-julki-tullut-pelatty-pykala-nayttaa-todella-pahalta-6749919</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1603845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1603845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[European MPs vote in favor of controversial copyright laws
https://www.engadget.com/2018/09/12/EU-copyright-directive-article-11-13-law-internet-ruling-censorship/?sr_source=Facebook

The ruling could change the internet forever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>European MPs vote in favor of controversial copyright laws<br />
<a href="https://www.engadget.com/2018/09/12/EU-copyright-directive-article-11-13-law-internet-ruling-censorship/?sr_source=Facebook" rel="nofollow">https://www.engadget.com/2018/09/12/EU-copyright-directive-article-11-13-law-internet-ruling-censorship/?sr_source=Facebook</a></p>
<p>The ruling could change the internet forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1603844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1603844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[European Parliament backs copyright changes
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-45495550]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>European Parliament backs copyright changes<br />
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-45495550" rel="nofollow">https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-45495550</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1603824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1603824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10400503]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10400503" rel="nofollow">https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10400503</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2018/09/11/julia-reda-showdown-on-upload-filters-and-the-link-tax-on-september-12-these-are-the-options-in-front-of-meps/comment-page-1/#comment-1603821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 12:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=179673#comment-1603821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EU approves controversial Copyright Directive, including internet ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved

Those in favor say they’re fighting for content creators, but critics say the new laws will be ‘catastrophic’]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EU approves controversial Copyright Directive, including internet ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’<br />
<a href="https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved" rel="nofollow">https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved</a></p>
<p>Those in favor say they’re fighting for content creators, but critics say the new laws will be ‘catastrophic’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
