<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Socket tester tested</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/</link>
	<description>All about electronics and circuit design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 21:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-1781286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 10:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=182899#comment-1781286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Habotest HT107D/E - socket tester
https://www.tnt-audio.com/accessories/habotest_ht107d_e.html

There are many different socket testers in the market, some are very basic and just tell you whether the cables are connected in the right way or not, but we audiophiles need more, as usual. I&#039;ve choosen this Habotest HT107D socket tester, which is labelled as “Pro”, whatever this might imply. Habotest is a Chinese company, located in Dongguan, which manufactures many different testers, so it is reassuring to know this is their sole business. They do not manufacture other electronic components, just testers. They also manufacture different socket testers. The one I&#039;ve decided to test is the model HT107D which is the most complete of the catalogue

what&#039;s going on/wrong. Theorically, the voltage between neutral and earth (N-E) should be 0 Volts, but in real life conditions it is considered acceptable if it stays below 10V. The lower the better, of course. This highly depends on the mains distribution system,

By measuring live-neutral voltage, neutral-ground voltage and live-ground voltage you are ready to answering these questions:

Is the outlet wired incorrectly?
Is the branch circuit too heavily loaded?
Do sensitive electronic components have the voltage they need to work (sound!) properly?

Conclusion
This Habotest HT107D is quite a useful device and lets you understand easily what&#039;s going on, even if you&#039;re not a trained technician. Just insert it into the socket you wish to test and you&#039;re done! It makes no use of batteries and is 100% safe to handle. Another must-have, I&#039;d say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Habotest HT107D/E &#8211; socket tester<br />
<a href="https://www.tnt-audio.com/accessories/habotest_ht107d_e.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.tnt-audio.com/accessories/habotest_ht107d_e.html</a></p>
<p>There are many different socket testers in the market, some are very basic and just tell you whether the cables are connected in the right way or not, but we audiophiles need more, as usual. I&#8217;ve choosen this Habotest HT107D socket tester, which is labelled as “Pro”, whatever this might imply. Habotest is a Chinese company, located in Dongguan, which manufactures many different testers, so it is reassuring to know this is their sole business. They do not manufacture other electronic components, just testers. They also manufacture different socket testers. The one I&#8217;ve decided to test is the model HT107D which is the most complete of the catalogue</p>
<p>what&#8217;s going on/wrong. Theorically, the voltage between neutral and earth (N-E) should be 0 Volts, but in real life conditions it is considered acceptable if it stays below 10V. The lower the better, of course. This highly depends on the mains distribution system,</p>
<p>By measuring live-neutral voltage, neutral-ground voltage and live-ground voltage you are ready to answering these questions:</p>
<p>Is the outlet wired incorrectly?<br />
Is the branch circuit too heavily loaded?<br />
Do sensitive electronic components have the voltage they need to work (sound!) properly?</p>
<p>Conclusion<br />
This Habotest HT107D is quite a useful device and lets you understand easily what&#8217;s going on, even if you&#8217;re not a trained technician. Just insert it into the socket you wish to test and you&#8217;re done! It makes no use of batteries and is 100% safe to handle. Another must-have, I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-1776547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 13:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=182899#comment-1776547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mapping Out The LEDs On An Outlet Tester
https://hackaday.com/2022/08/09/mapping-out-the-leds-on-an-outlet-tester/

The concept of an outlet tester is pretty simple: plug the gadget into a suspect wall receptacle, and an array of LEDs light up in various patterns to alert the user to any wiring faults. They’re cheap, reliable, and instantaneous. Most people wouldn’t give them much more thought than that, but like any good hacker, [Yeo Kheng Meng] wanted to know how these devices worked.

After picking up a relatively advanced model that featured an LCD display capable of showing various stats such as detected voltage in addition to the standard trio of LEDs, he started by using some test leads to simulate various fault conditions to understand the basic principle behind its operation. The next step was to disassemble the unit, which is where things went briefly sideways — it wasn’t until [Yeo Kheng Meng] and a friend had nearly cut through the enclosure that they realized it wasn’t ultrasonically welded liked they assumed, and that the screws holding it together were actually hidden under a sticker. Oops.

The write-up includes some excellent PCB shots, and [Yeo Kheng Meng] was able to identify several components and ascertain their function. 

Teardown of Habotest HT107E Socket Tester
https://yeokhengmeng.com/2022/08/teardown-of-habotest-ht107e-socket-tester/

https://github.com/yeokm1/ht107e-socket-tester-teardown]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mapping Out The LEDs On An Outlet Tester<br />
<a href="https://hackaday.com/2022/08/09/mapping-out-the-leds-on-an-outlet-tester/" rel="nofollow">https://hackaday.com/2022/08/09/mapping-out-the-leds-on-an-outlet-tester/</a></p>
<p>The concept of an outlet tester is pretty simple: plug the gadget into a suspect wall receptacle, and an array of LEDs light up in various patterns to alert the user to any wiring faults. They’re cheap, reliable, and instantaneous. Most people wouldn’t give them much more thought than that, but like any good hacker, [Yeo Kheng Meng] wanted to know how these devices worked.</p>
<p>After picking up a relatively advanced model that featured an LCD display capable of showing various stats such as detected voltage in addition to the standard trio of LEDs, he started by using some test leads to simulate various fault conditions to understand the basic principle behind its operation. The next step was to disassemble the unit, which is where things went briefly sideways — it wasn’t until [Yeo Kheng Meng] and a friend had nearly cut through the enclosure that they realized it wasn’t ultrasonically welded liked they assumed, and that the screws holding it together were actually hidden under a sticker. Oops.</p>
<p>The write-up includes some excellent PCB shots, and [Yeo Kheng Meng] was able to identify several components and ascertain their function. </p>
<p>Teardown of Habotest HT107E Socket Tester<br />
<a href="https://yeokhengmeng.com/2022/08/teardown-of-habotest-ht107e-socket-tester/" rel="nofollow">https://yeokhengmeng.com/2022/08/teardown-of-habotest-ht107e-socket-tester/</a></p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/yeokm1/ht107e-socket-tester-teardown" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/yeokm1/ht107e-socket-tester-teardown</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-1731576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=182899#comment-1731576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inside a mains socket tester with LCD display. (with schematic)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xm4l13aY6I

I was sent this socket tester by Adrian, who had been disappointed that the LCD display was not the information display that was implied in some of the eBay listings.
The LCD display is very simple, but it does provide a very functional test for dangerous voltage potentials with respect to the building&#039;s earth/ground circuit.  That&#039;s rare, but a polarity test is an important part of the test of an electrical installation.  This plug is simple, but very functional.  It&#039;s not as glamorous or sophisticated as the &quot;Socket &amp; See&quot; tester with its automatic loop impedance check (the resistance of the entire live/earth loop to the utility transformer) but it&#039;s a fraction of the price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inside a mains socket tester with LCD display. (with schematic)<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xm4l13aY6I" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xm4l13aY6I</a></p>
<p>I was sent this socket tester by Adrian, who had been disappointed that the LCD display was not the information display that was implied in some of the eBay listings.<br />
The LCD display is very simple, but it does provide a very functional test for dangerous voltage potentials with respect to the building&#8217;s earth/ground circuit.  That&#8217;s rare, but a polarity test is an important part of the test of an electrical installation.  This plug is simple, but very functional.  It&#8217;s not as glamorous or sophisticated as the &#8220;Socket &amp; See&#8221; tester with its automatic loop impedance check (the resistance of the entire live/earth loop to the utility transformer) but it&#8217;s a fraction of the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-1731464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=182899#comment-1731464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good versus evil socket testers. (with schematics)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_3FCAbNyMM

One of these socket testers is great and one has been over-engineered with lots of extra weaknesses as a result.  In hindsight I&#039;m wondering if the hot resistors (110C) were masking the transistor or if the transistor itself was getting that hot.  If it is dissipating about quarter of a watt then it should be within its capability.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good versus evil socket testers. (with schematics)<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_3FCAbNyMM" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_3FCAbNyMM</a></p>
<p>One of these socket testers is great and one has been over-engineered with lots of extra weaknesses as a result.  In hindsight I&#8217;m wondering if the hot resistors (110C) were masking the transistor or if the transistor itself was getting that hot.  If it is dissipating about quarter of a watt then it should be within its capability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-1660450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 08:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=182899#comment-1660450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Socket Tester detects a missing earth condition, shown on the tester as ●○○, the internal circuitry will source a voltage from the phase conductor onto the earth pin of the socket outlet, as well as any metal parts connected to the earth pin of the socket.

Such a condition can result in an electric shock to the user. The current level is probably not life threatening in most cases but could be painful and may be sufficient to knock a person down or off a ladder.

https://www.fluke.com/en-gb/support/safety-notices/fluke-sm100-sm200-and-sm300-electrical-socket-testers-voluntary-recall]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Socket Tester detects a missing earth condition, shown on the tester as ●○○, the internal circuitry will source a voltage from the phase conductor onto the earth pin of the socket outlet, as well as any metal parts connected to the earth pin of the socket.</p>
<p>Such a condition can result in an electric shock to the user. The current level is probably not life threatening in most cases but could be painful and may be sufficient to knock a person down or off a ladder.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.fluke.com/en-gb/support/safety-notices/fluke-sm100-sm200-and-sm300-electrical-socket-testers-voluntary-recall" rel="nofollow">https://www.fluke.com/en-gb/support/safety-notices/fluke-sm100-sm200-and-sm300-electrical-socket-testers-voluntary-recall</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-1660448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 08:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=182899#comment-1660448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does this have this minor leakage problem also?

Why Fluke are recalling their SM100/200/300 plug-in testers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KOYt-0WZxg

Fluke are recalling their plug-in socket testers and offering exchange products.  There&#039;s nothing actually wrong with the testers other than the modest current used to power the test indicators that can cause a strong sensation when a ground path is open circuit and someone bridges it during the test.  (mild shock risk)

The recall is more an indication of the increasingly litigious nature of society and the current trend of deskilling the electrical industry 

https://www.fluke.com/en-gb/support/safety-notices]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this have this minor leakage problem also?</p>
<p>Why Fluke are recalling their SM100/200/300 plug-in testers.<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KOYt-0WZxg" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KOYt-0WZxg</a></p>
<p>Fluke are recalling their plug-in socket testers and offering exchange products.  There&#8217;s nothing actually wrong with the testers other than the modest current used to power the test indicators that can cause a strong sensation when a ground path is open circuit and someone bridges it during the test.  (mild shock risk)</p>
<p>The recall is more an indication of the increasingly litigious nature of society and the current trend of deskilling the electrical industry </p>
<p><a href="https://www.fluke.com/en-gb/support/safety-notices" rel="nofollow">https://www.fluke.com/en-gb/support/safety-notices</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-1657663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 08:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=182899#comment-1657663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taiss TA106B socket tester pro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmoYUm8Jkik]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taiss TA106B socket tester pro<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmoYUm8Jkik" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmoYUm8Jkik</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Engdahl</title>
		<link>https://www.epanorama.net/blog/2019/06/27/socket-tester-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-1657661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomi Engdahl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 07:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/?p=182899#comment-1657661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SDG Mailbag #035 Testing a Cheap AC Socket Wiring Tester (Use with caution...)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6pZ_eiGu6o]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SDG Mailbag #035 Testing a Cheap AC Socket Wiring Tester (Use with caution&#8230;)<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6pZ_eiGu6o" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6pZ_eiGu6o</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
