Comments on: AI bullshit

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:07:24 +0000

“Electricity is all about precision, power, and safety.”
And you get none of them from AI slop posted to Facebook.

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Sun, 30 Aug 2026 09:02:22 +0000

Comment for most schematics on Facebook:
You need to get a refund on your education or your schematic editor.

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Sun, 30 Aug 2026 06:15:58 +0000

The Cynical & Literal
World Wide Waste (WWW): Captures the sheer volume of digital slop, SEO bait, and unverified AI hallucinations filling up the index.
World Wide Wall (WWW): Refers to the endless paywalls, cookie consent popups, ad overlays, and login gates that obstruct basic navigation.
World Wide Window-shopping (WWW): Highlights how nearly every link ultimately resolves into a funnel trying to monetize your attention or push a subscription.

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Sun, 30 Aug 2026 06:12:17 +0000

AI is destroying the net . No longer a source of information .
Just fake news for click bait to sell advertising and advertising

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Sat, 29 Aug 2026 21:18:35 +0000

maybe the AI that many Facebook “content producers” use should be renamed AS (Artificial Stupidity).
And Facebook should be renamed Fakebook

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Fri, 28 Aug 2026 22:09:27 +0000

if it is in Facebook, marked being made with AI or with lifestyle tag, it is more than 90% propabability of being not working AI trash and not a real circuit.
Facebook has become Fakebook of electronics.

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Fri, 28 Aug 2026 22:05:41 +0000

Technical content should be accurate, not just made to look impressive. AI-generated images can easily miss critical components or create unsafe designs, so it’s always better to verify the circuit before trusting or building it.

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:28:02 +0000

Süleyman Kondakci content producers don’t even need natural intelligence, running their slop just to some other AI would tell correctly in most cases that their circuit does not work.

Google Gemini or ChatGPT will very often tell correctly that the circuit does not work.

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:48:38 +0000

He is as right as saying, I am a nobody, nobody is perfect, therefore I am perfect.

By: Tomi Engdahl

Tomi Engdahl — Sun, 23 Aug 2026 23:50:47 +0000

Act as a senior hardware design and diagnostic engineer specializing in analog, power, and embedded circuit analysis.

Whenever I upload a circuit diagram or schematic image, perform a rigorous technical audit using the following structure:

1. AI Render & Text Hallucinations:
– Identify nonsensical, inverted, or gibberish component text/labels.
– Flag physically impossible connections, floating solder nodes, or incorrect 3D renders.

2. Critical Electrical & Safety Flaws:
– Biasing & Pinout Errors: Check transistor polarity (NPN vs. PNP), terminal orientation (B-C-E), and op-amp supply/feedback routing.
– Power & Short Hazards: Spot direct supply shorts, missing current-limiting, and severe overcurrent risks.
– AC/Mains Safety: Highlight reactive dropper risks, dielectric breakdown, missing bleeder resistors, or high-voltage shock hazards.
– Signal Integrity: Spot dead feedback loops, phase inversions, floating nodes, or missing flyback diodes.

3. Core Functional Assessment:
– Explain why the circuit fails in its stated function (e.g., why an oscillator latches DC, why a dropper collapses under load).

4. Practical Corrective Action:
– Provide concise step-by-step instructions or proper component values to turn it into a real, functioning circuit.

Keep the tone direct, precise, and focused on physical circuit behavior. Skip generic conversational fluff.