Digital cameras are phasing out analog

Digital cameras are slowly phasing out analog. In still cameras the situation seems to be so that the manufacturers of the films  are stopping to manufacture well known film types. For example Polaroid has phased out Polaroid film years ago and Kodak is retiring iconic Kodachrome film. Digital photography winds the once-iconic color films into obscurity. To celebrate the Kodachrome film’s retirement, Kodak has created an online gallery of some of Kodachrome’s best shots. Before the film has fully retired it might be also a good idea to take a look at the Chemistry of Photography.

kodachrome slide mount 1990s

46 Comments

  1. Sarah says:
    Pretty nice post. I just came across your site and wanted to say
    that I have really liked reading your posts. In any case
    I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!
    Reply
  2. R. Darryl Stracner says:
    Good value for the price. Best point and shoot in its range. If you want to shed some more monet then 780 is the way to go but thi sdoes all what I need to compliment my Nikon SLR D-90
    Reply
  3. Camille Wilson says:
    If it’s price tag was higher – I wouldn’t give it 5 stars due to the poor construction and AF performance. It’s just plasticky and misses focus in low light. Not a good match for users who put their dSLRs and lens through rough use, but for a more relaxed user of Rebel or 20d/30d this is a nice pick.If you look past the build quality (and you should) this little lens packs a punch. I got this since I don’t like to use flash and like to shoot in low-light – decided to try a prime and this was an obvious pick.I’ve got a good copy – sharp even wide open at 1.8, providing you get the focus correct, since DOF is very shallow and the lens does have some focus field curvature. Users who mention softness wide open probably use the “focus-recompose” technique , which is not a good idea with such a large aperture since your focal plane will shift. You should always frame the shot with the correct AF point.Wide open it has less contrast, but that tends to work well for portraits. At f/8, it’s remarkable.All in all, I’m happy with it.
    Reply
  4. Photoshop Brushes says:
    I stumbled accross your blog by using stumbleupon and love the design of the whole thing! I normally skip straight past blogs as I have over 20 in my RSS and dont even have time to read the ones that I have! I am started out as a blogger myself and always tried to keep the design simple like yours as I think it is crucial, if you can back it up with some lovely pics like yours! Keep up the nice work! Cheers!
    Reply
  5. Clorisa D. Brown says:
    This camera takes GREAT pictures. The quality of the pictures is better than I expected. The image stabilization works really well. None of my pictures have been blurred, even when I have accidentally moved while taking a picture. The colors are very vivid. Movies come out great as well.My only concern is the door for the battery/memory card compartment. The hinge seems kind of flimsy, so I am extra careful whenever I open it.Other than that – I would highly recommend this camera. And the red color is absolutely THE BEST!!!!!!!LOVE IT, LOVE IT, LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Reply
  6. tomi says:
    What exactly is wrong with the navigation?
    Reply
  7. tomi says:
    I have a good number of users on the main site and good Google search rankings. It keeps users coming in to read the blog.
    Then I make sure that I have a continuous flow of goof articles coming all the time.
    I don’t tell all the tricks….
    Reply
  8. Bobbi Birdette says:
    I would like to share it with all my friends and hope they will like it too.
    Reply
  9. tomi says:
    You don’t need to be perfect in your grammar to have people like what you write if the content is otherwise very good and original.
    Perfect grammar helps, because frequent grammatic errors cause many people stop reading the blog….
    Reply
  10. Digital Cameras says:
    I am trying to decide if i should get a SLR or a point and shoot digital camera.
    Reply
  11. Rachael Coughran says:
    Amazing Dude, that is extremely helpful info, appreciated.
    Reply
  12. louis vuitton says:
    thanks !! very helpful post!
    Reply
  13. samsung phone says:
    my God, i thought you were going to chip in with some decisive insght at the end there, not leave it
    Reply
  14. Blake Moun says:
    Thanks a lot for the post.Really thank you! Will read on…
    Reply
  15. Rob Paree says:
    update as much as possible this probably on of the best blogs I have been to
    Reply
  16. Digital Camera Sports Photography says:
    Recently, I didn’t give so much thought to writing comments on blog entries and have left comments even less. Checking out your informative page, will probably encourage me to do this more regularly.
    Reply
  17. Youth Sports Photography Business says:
    Very useful info. These is exactly what I was looking for and it`s what I need if I am to become more than an amateur photographer. Thanx and keep up the good work.
    Reply
  18. Konta Osobiste says:
    I just sent this post to a bunch of my friends as I agree with most of what you’re saying here and the way you’ve presented it is awesome.
    Reply
  19. tomi says:
    I have done lot of coding myself and also outsourced some jobs.
    Reply
  20. PTZ IP Camera says:
    Hey guys, this good wook!
    Reply
  21. tomi says:
    This blog is hosted on Amazon cloud.
    Reply
  22. Ramon Palomares says:
    I actually wanted to compose a note in order to say thanks to you for all the pleasant advice you are posting on this site. My extended internet search has at the end of the day been rewarded with brilliant suggestions to go over with my friends. I would declare that most of us readers are quite endowed to be in a good website with many awesome professionals with good tips. I feel pretty happy to have seen your website and look forward to some more cool times reading here. Thanks again for everything.
    Reply
  23. tomi says:
    Kodak Teeters on the Brink
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203471004577140841495542810.html

    Eastman Kodak Co. is preparing to seek bankruptcy protection in the coming weeks, people familiar with the matter said, a move that would cap a stunning comedown for a company that once ranked among America’s corporate titans.

    That Kodak is even contemplating a bankruptcy filing represents a final reversal of fortune for a company that once dominated its industry

    Kodak, whose near-monopoly on film produced high margins that the company shared with its workers.

    Former employees say the company was the Apple Inc. or Google Inc. of its time.

    Reply
  24. Tomi Engdahl says:
    Kodak Failing, But Camera Phones Not To Blame
    http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/01/09/0455219/kodak-failing-but-camera-phones-not-to-blame

    According to the Wall Street Journal, camera manufacturer Kodak is preparing to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, following a long struggle to maintain any sort of viable business.

    Looking at camera data from Flickr, of images uploaded in 2011, camera phones only make up 3% of the total. Dedicated cameras from Canon, Nikon and yes, Kodak were used to take 97% of the images.

    What Kodak failed to understand is that people have switched from taking photos for remembering and commemorative reasons to using photos for identity and communication. The shift changes the emphasis away from print to social media platforms and dedicated apps.

    Kodak makes its money (or used to) from film, not the camera hardware itself. All those ‘dedicated cameras’ are busy taking shots without a single bit of negative being exposed.

    Reply
  25. Rebecca McDunn says:
    Toes not did. Hair looking like shit. She wearing white Old navy flip flops. -________-
    Reply
  26. Tomi Engdahl says:
    Not a Kodak Moment: Legendary Camera Maker Files for Bankruptcy Protection
    http://allthingsd.com/20120118/not-a-kodak-moment-as-camera-maker-files-for-bankruptcy/

    Struggling camera maker Kodak said on Wednesday night that it has filed for Chapter 11 reorganization.

    The move, which had been expected, follows years of struggle by the film giant to transition to a digital imaging company. In recent months the company has sought to capitalize on its patents and, in recent days, has sued Apple, HTC and Samsung.

    Kodak Considers Restructuring Chief, Sues Samsung
    http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052970204555904577169063509420828-lMyQjAxMTAyMDEwODExNDgyWj.html

    Eastman Kodak Co. is preparing to appoint a chief restructuring officer, a move that could help the company secure financing needed to stay afloat during bankruptcy proceedings, people familiar with the matter said.

    Reply
  27. Tomi Engdahl says:
    Why Kodak’s bankruptcy should scare Nokia
    http://gigaom.com/2012/01/19/why-kodaks-bankruptcy-should-scare-nokia/

    Kodak’s bankruptcy. Shocking (and sad) as it might be, it is not all that surprising. People have been watching the company’s slow free fall for years. The Economist has a great rundown of what went wrongat the company
    http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2012/01/kodak-files-bankruptcy-protection-1

    Reply
  28. Tomi Engdahl says:
    Kodak’s travails provide multiple lessons
    Markets and technologies that once looked as though they would last forever sometimes do not.
    http://www.edn.com/article/520715-Kodak_s_travails_provide_multiple_lessons.php?cid=NL_UBM+Electronics

    The lesson is that disruptive technologies truly are so, and most companies can’t—or shouldn’t—make that transition. In the electronics world, for example, only a few vendors of vacuum tubes made it into the transistor world, and only a few of the transistor companies made it into ICs. Such is change.

    Not that long ago, the commentary-and-pundit class was worried—and fearful—that, as we entered the 21st century, IBM and its PCs running on Intel CPUs with Microsoft Windows operating systems would dominate. So where are we now, smart folks? IBM is out of the PC business, and both Intel and Microsoft, though still major players, face tough competition in both CPUs and operating systems for new smartphones, tablets, and embedded products

    Reply
  29. carved fruit says:
    Very nice blog. Thanks. I found you via Google . Also, I will back tommorow to see more at your blog!
    Reply
  30. pheromone cologne says:
    Interesting homepage. Can I give you a suggestion? I think u’ve got something good in this article. But what if you give a couple hyperlinks to a page that relates to what you’re point of view?
    Reply
  31. facial wash says:
    This is exactly the information I wanted. Thanks for writing this post in your website.
    Reply
  32. Prezenty says:
    area” you will be alerted. More information…
    Reply
  33. Raggs Higginson says:
    MTV is getting busy with the True Life’s!!! LOVE IT!
    Reply
  34. is my kefir bad says:
    It may be five years from now, but at some point we’ll be better than them.
    Reply
  35. kefir grains in bangalore says:
    Alienation as our present destiny is achieved only by outrageous violence perpetrated by human beings on human beings.
    Reply
  36. Bail Bonds Orange County says:
    hehe wew, hands down incrediblest post i’ve ever read.
    Reply
  37. Car Auction says:
    Incredible! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a completely different topic but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Outstanding choice of colors!
    Reply
  38. Winston Roiger says:
    Just wanna input on few general things, The website style is perfect, the written content is real excellent : D.
    Reply
  39. Jay Bulger says:
    this article was great.
    Reply
  40. Tomi Engdahl says:
    Why Polaroid Was the Apple of Its Time
    http://www.wired.com/design/2012/10/instant-the-story-of-polaroid/

    It’s easy to forget now, but instant camera maker Polaroid once matched the mythos — and ubiquity — of Apple. Much like Steve Jobs, founder Edwin Land was single-minded in his determination to create unique products with a strong affinity for design. For Jobs, Land was an all-time hero.

    In the new book Instant: The Story of Polaroid, New York senior editor Christopher Bonanos traces the dramatic rise and near-collapse of one of America’s most iconic companies.

    Wired Design caught up with Bonanos to discuss Lands’ lasting influence, Polaroid’s legal battles and business woes, and a comparison with the favorite photo sharing service of today, Instagram.

    Reply
  41. Marcelo Ainge says:
    I have read some excellent stuff here. Certainly price bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much effort you place to create such a great informative web site.
    Reply
  42. Vanita Troublefield says:
    Some truly excellent content on this internet site, thank you for contribution. “He that falls in love with himself will have no rivals.” by Benjamin Franklin.
    Reply
  43. Tomi Engdahl says:
    Kodak’s Problem Child
    How the blue-chip company was bankrupted by one of its own innovations
    https://medium.com/editors-picks/3e1d3fc4a3e

    George Eastman invented casual photography here in the 1880s, made a fortune, and built a small town into a city. Millions of people around the world “pressed the button” and for more than a hundred years, Kodak “took care of the rest.”

    At its peak, in 1996, Kodak was rated the fourth-most-valuable global brand. That year, the company had about two-thirds of the global photo market, annual revenues of $16 billion, and a market capitalization of $31 billion.

    With a bitter blizzard hammering down in upstate New York, a bankruptcy judge had just approved a proposal to resolve a big chunk of Kodak’s $6.8 billion in debt and pave the way for it to emerge from Chapter 11 after more than a year of insolvency. The company expects to finalize the process and exit bankruptcy protection in the third quarter of this year.

    On the front page is news of the sale of thousands of Kodak’s digital-imaging patents to a consortium led by Apple, Google, and Microsoft. The price is a fraction of the $2 billion that Kodak executives thought the patents would bring, but it will help buy time as the cash-poor company pursues its reorganization plan.

    Among other things, Kodak CEO Antonio M. Perez is betting his commercial-printing business on high-volume customers who need a lot of ink, like product-packaging manufacturers.

    Kodachrome, was finally discontinued in 2009. For nearly seventy-two years, Kodachrome was the crown jewel of the color-film portfolio. Kodachrome was the crown jewel of the color-film portfolio. Photojournalist Steve McCurry used it to shoot the now-iconic June 1985 National Geographic cover, an image of a wide-eyed Afghan girl. Today, it is just another discontinued film stock.

    Andrews calls himself a victim of “technological substitutions,

    chemical division — divested in 1993 — continues as an R & D and earnings powerhouse today, with $8.6 billion in revenues in 2012.

    Suddenly it was easy for anyone to take lots of pictures, and Eastman’s new business became a juggernaut almost overnight.

    About ninety years later, another tinkerer in Kodak labs would create an integrated circuit that turned light waves into digital images. It too would be labeled a toy by the few people who saw it. It too would eventually launch a huge new business all but overnight. But this time, Kodak wouldn’t be part of it.

    According to his numbers, a roll of film that cost one dollar to produce was marked up 800 percent, which allowed the company to generate its enormous profits. This drove the company’s growth, he argued, but eventually it turned into a trap when managers, addicted to the revenue, ignored clear signs that the market was shifting to digital and the end of the old way was in sight.

    “They were in denial all the way,” he says. “They didn’t want to give up a 90 percent market in film to have a 10 to 20 percent market in consumer electronics.”

    Analysts have pointed to a number of factors in Kodak’s fall, from general mismanagement to poor financial decisions. Its divestiture of Eastman Chemical stripped billions in cash flow that might have propped it up as it struggled to make the transition to digital. Others point to antitrust suits that hampered the company for decades and opened the door to rivals. Some of those, notably Fuji, were able to manage the analog-to-digital conversion successfully.

    As demand for electronic photography slowly grew through the 1980s, the Electronic Photography Division (EPD) became the catchall for a new generation of Kodak engineers trained not in chemicals, but computer science.

    One of the things that always drove me crazy,” Rubin remembers, “was when a proposal was denied because either somebody else was doing it, or nobody else was doing it. There was no wiggle room…[unless] Fuji was doing it too.”

    The subterfuge helped them bring some experimental products to market, but then they encountered a new problem they hadn’t expected: No matter what they came up with, nothing digital would sell. To consumers, everything was too expensive, and to professionals, the quality was not yet good enough. “It was a difficult thing to market,” Sucy admits, “especially for people who didn’t have any kind of experience marketing this kind of product; people who didn’t really know what it did.”

    In the end, being early did not help, because the market simply wasn’t ready.

    As obvious as the endgame was, Kodak’s leaders were faced with an unwinnable predicament: either keep investing in end-of-life products until the profits dried up — and die over the long run; or switch to stillborn product lines that produced mostly red ink in the ledgers — and die immediately.

    the engineers had developed a four-megapixel sensor by the late 1980s. How did Kodak fail to convert such a massive head start into success?

    “Who could afford that?” Anderson fired back, unimpressed. “Macs were really expensive. Computing technology couldn’t have kept up until much later.”

    When Kodak finally entered consumer photography in force, at the end of the 1990s, it did so as a dominant brand in a growing market. They produced cameras that were forerunners technologically and in 2003 were best sellers — but, crushingly, had to sell them to consumers at a loss of up to sixty dollars apiece.

    The company threw its remaining R & D muscle at a dizzying array of digital-imaging technologies and products, notably scanners and printers.

    Instead of finding new opportunities, Kodak faced even more disruption as the consumer camera market moved into phones, and nimble start-ups pounced on social photo-sharing opportunities.

    Reply
  44. Tomi Engdahl says:
    Kodak Ends Production of Acetate Base For Photographic Film
    http://news.slashdot.org/story/13/06/13/1917200/kodak-ends-production-of-acetate-base-for-photographic-film

    “According to a report by Rochester, NY CBS affiliate WROC Kodak has ended in-house production of the cellulose acetate base that is the primary component of photographic film. Popular Photography magazine adds that, for more than 100 years, Kodak has made the acetate in house in bulk, providing the structural basis for the company’s film.”

    Reply
  45. Tomi Engdahl says:
    Kodak To End Production Of Acetate Film Base
    http://rochesterhomepage.net/fulltext?nxd_id=394722

    But even the film expert and long time photographer has turned to a digital.
    “It’s fast and it’s easy. I get instant satisfaction making a print.”
    That’s is a prime reason Eastman Kodak has decided to halt acetate production.
    The demand for camera film has dropped significantly.
    “The day of snapshot in the hands of consumer photographers using film I think has long passed.” – See more at: http://rochesterhomepage.net/fulltext?nxd_id=394722#sthash.ZjIK3ZYS.dpuf

    Reply
  46. Tomi Engdahl says:
    Kodak prepares $406 million offering as it eyes bankruptcy exit
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/19/us-eastmankodak-bankruptcy-idUSBRE95I01N20130619

    (Reuters) – Eastman Kodak Co on Tuesday said it will seek court approval for a $406 million rights offering that could give creditors a big equity stake in the company after it emerges from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*