Here are some web trends for 2020:
Responsive web design in 2020 should be a given because every serious project that you create should look good and be completely usable on all devices. But there’s no need to over-complicate things.
Web Development in 2020: What Coding Tools You Should Learn article gives an overview of recommendations what you learn to become a web developer in 2020.
You might have seen Web 3.0 on some slides. What is the definition of web 3 we are talking about here?
There seems to be many different to choose from… Some claim that you need to blockchain the cloud IOT otherwise you’ll just get a stack overflow in the mainframe but I don’t agree on that.
Information on the web address bar will be reduced on some web browsers. With the release of Chrome 79, Google completes its goal of erasing www from the browser by no longer allowing Chrome users to automatically show the www trivial subdomain in the address bar.
You still should target to build quality web site and avoid the signs of a low-quality web site. Get good inspiration for your web site design.
Still a clear and logical structure is the first thing that needs to be turned over in mind before the work on the website gears up. The website structure for search robots is its internal links. The more links go to a page, the higher its priority within the website, and the more times the search engine crawls it.
You should upgrade your web site, but you need to do it sensibly and well. Remember that a site upgrade can ruin your search engine visibility if you do it badly. The biggest risk to your site getting free search engine visibility is site redesign. Bad technology selection can ruin the visibility of a new site months before launch. Many new sites built on JavaScript application frameworks do not benefit in any way from the new technologies. Before you go into this bandwagon, you should think critically about whether your site will benefit from the dynamic capabilities of these technologies more than they can damage your search engine visibility. Well built redirects can help you keep the most outbound links after site changes.
If you go to the JavaScript framework route on your web site, keep in mind that there are many to choose, and you need to choose carefully to find one that fits for your needs and is actively developed also in the future.
JavaScript survey: Devs love a bit of React, but Angular and Cordova declining. And you’re not alone… a chunk of pros also feel JS is ‘overly complex’
Keep in mind the recent changes on the video players and Google analytics. And for animated content keep in mind that GIF animations exists still as a potential tool to use.
Keep in mind the the security. There is a skill gap in security for many. I’m not going to say anything that anyone who runs a public-facing web server doesn’t already know: the majority of these automated blind requests are for WordPress directories and files. PHP exploits are a distant second. And there are many other things that are automatically attacked. Test your site with security scanners.
APIs now account for 40% of the attack surface for all web-enabled apps. OWASP has identified 10 areas where enterprises can lower that risk. There are many vulnerability scanning tools available. Check also How to prepare and use Docker for web pentest . Mozilla has a nice on-line tool for web site security scanning.
The slow death of Flash continues. If you still use Flash, say goodbye to it. Google says goodbye to Flash, will stop indexing Flash content in search.
Use HTTPS on your site because without it your site rating will drop on search engines visibility. It is nowadays easy to get HTTPS certificates.
Write good content and avoid publishing fake news on your site. Finland is winning the war on fake news. What it’s learned may be crucial to Western democracy,
Think to who you are aiming to your business web site to. Analyze who is your “true visitor” or “power user”. A true visitor is a visitor to a website who shows a genuine interest in the content of the site. True visitors are the people who should get more of your site and have the potential to increase the sales and impact of your business. The content that your business offers is intended to attract visitors who are interested in it. When they show their interest, they are also very likely to be the target group of the company.
Should you think of your content management system (CMS) choice? Flexibility, efficiency, better content creation: these are just some of the promised benefits of a new CMS. Here is How to convince your developers to change CMS.
Here are some fun for the end:
Did you know that if a spider creates a web at a place?
The place is called a website
Confession: How JavaScript was made.
2,361 Comments
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://jukkasoft.com/2021/04/05/seo-ja-nollas-paasaanto/
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.dna.fi/yrityksille/blogi/-/blogs/digimaailmassa-valttaa-tartunnat-mutta-palvelun-pitaa-pelata-siellakin?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=linkad&utm_content=blogi_digimaailmassa_valttaa_tartunnat_mutta_palvelun_pitaa_pelata_siellakin&utm_campaign=yr_jatkuva_some_21&fbclid=IwAR2P6GdGGdrzpYnHaU-2Pa9jhZK9hXhT2-AOhd7V7TuwMODN9BauSq9HZ1Q
Tomi Engdahl says:
The Conundrum of Information Scarcity in a Time of Information Overload
https://slate.com/technology/2021/02/leigh-alexander-the-void-response-information-overload-scarcity.html
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.fraktio.fi/blogi/kayttajalahtoinen-suunnittelu-etatyoaikana?utm_source=social&utm_medium=paid&fbclid=IwAR08HXUUCrVEVnND3VQa4Ip1kc2ibgz_qK9tAxuhvTAhFNY1a9PKlN6dueg
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.digimarkkinointi.fi/blogi/video-on-viestinnan-megatrendi
Tomi Engdahl says:
Brave Browser:
Brave is disabling Google’s FLoC tracking method from all of its releases, saying it materially harms user privacy under the guise of being privacy-friendly — Peter Snyder, Senior Privacy Researcher at Brave — FLoC is a recent Google proposal that would have your browser share …
Why Brave Disables FLoC
A Step in the Wrong Direction
https://brave.com/why-brave-disables-floc/
FLoC is a recent Google proposal that would have your browser share your browsing behavior and interests by default with every site and advertiser with which you interact. Brave opposes FLoC, along with any other feature designed to share information about you and your interests without your fully informed consent. To protect Brave users, Brave has removed FLoC in the Nightly version of both Brave for desktop and Android. The privacy-affecting aspects of FLoC have never been enabled in Brave releases; the additional implementation details of FLoC will be removed from all Brave releases with this week’s stable release. Brave is also disabling FLoC on our websites, to protect Chrome users learning about Brave.
Companies are finally being forced to respect user privacy (even if only minimally), pushed by trends such as increased user education, the success of privacy-first tools (e.g., Brave among others), and the growth of legislation including the CCPA and GPDR. In the face of these trends, it is disappointing to see Google, instead of taking the present opportunity to help design and build a user-first, privacy-first Web, proposing and immediately shipping in Chrome a set of smaller, ad-tech-conserving changes, which explicitly prioritize maintaining the structure of the Web advertising ecosystem as Google sees it.
For the Web to be trusted and to flourish, we hold that much more is needed than the complex yet conservative chair-shuffling embodied by FLoC and Privacy Sandbox. Deeper changes to how creators pay their bills via ads are not only possible, but necessary.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.euronews.com/living/2021/04/12/what-do-veganism-and-conspiracy-theories-have-in-common
Tomi Engdahl says:
Chinese Regulators Crackdown On Internet Companies Ordering Them To “Rectify” Irregularities
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/chinese-regulators-crackdown-internet-companies-ordering-them-rectify-irregularities
Chinese stocks stumbled on Tuesday after regulators warned 34 technology giants, including Tencent, Alibaba, Baidu, JD.com, Didi, and Meituan, to “rectify” anti-competitive measures, according to Global Times, citing a statement from the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR).
Thirty-four tech firms attended an administrative and supervisory meeting held on Tuesday. They were given approximately one month to “rectify their monopolistic acts and tax-related irregularities or violations” after an internal government probe. These firms were told they had about a month to correct any practices that “harms competition.
The meeting also outlined how these tech firms create unfair competition in the economy that prevents innovation and development and harms business operators and consumers’ interests.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2338760726256543&id=138883109577660
Avoimen datan rajapinnassa on tästä päivästä alkaen käytössä uusi HTTP-rajapinta meteorologisten aikasarjojen hakuun. Rajapinnasta voi hakea sekä havaintoja että ennusteita. Historiatietoa on tarjolla 7 päivää taaksepäin.
Rajapinta on alunperin tarkoitettu Ilmatieteen laitoksen sisäiseen käyttöön eikä ole minkään standardin mukainen. Päätimme silti avata sen halukkaille välivaiheena uusia helppokäyttöisempiä standardinmukaisia rajapintoja odotellessa. Rajapinta on käytettävyydeltään sopiva web-sovelluksiin ja siitä saa datan ulos monessa eri formaatissa.
Lisätietoa: https://github.com/fmidev/smartmet-plugin-timeseries/wiki/SmartMet-plugin-TimeSeries
Huomaathan, että avoimen datan tukipalvelu ei välttämättä osaa auttaa tähän rajapintaan liittyvissä kyselyissä!
Rajapinnan perusosoite on https://opendata.fmi.fi/timeseries?
Tomi Engdahl says:
Reuters website goes behind paywall in new strategy
https://www.reuters.com/business/reuters-website-goes-behind-paywall-new-strategy-2021-04-15/
Tomi Engdahl says:
Charlie Osborne / ZDNet:
Internal Facebook emails, accidentally sent to a journalist, show its “long-term strategy” for data scraping incidents, framing it as a “broad industry issue” — More scraping incidents are “expected” in the future. — An internal email accidentally leaked by Facebook …
Internal Facebook email reveals intent to frame data scraping as ‘normalized, broad industry issue’
Updated: More scraping incidents are “expected” in the future.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/facebook-internal-email-reveals-intent-to-frame-data-scraping-as-broad-industry-issue-and-normalized/
An internal email accidentally leaked by Facebook to a journalist has revealed the firm’s intentions to frame a recent data scraping incident as “normalized” and a “broad industry issue.”
The scraping and subsequent online posting of user data raised widespread criticism and on April 14, the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) said it planned to launch an inquiry to ascertain if GDPR regulations and/or the Data Protection Act 2018 have been “infringed by Facebook.”
Now, an internal email leaked to the media (Dutch article, translated) has potentially revealed how Facebook wishes to handle the blowback.
This month, Data News editor Pieterjan Van Leemputten sent several queries to Facebook requesting an update on the data scraping incident and further clarity concerning the breach timeline.
However, Facebook accidentally included the journalist in an internal emailed discussion thread.
In the original emails sent to EMEA region PR staff, viewed by ZDNet and dated from April 8, Facebook’s team outlined an overall “long-term strategy” for dealing with coverage of data scraping incidents.
“Assuming press volume continues to decline, we’re not planning additional statements on this issue,” the email reads. “Longer term, though, we expect more scraping incidents and think it’s important to both frame this as a broad industry issue and normalize the fact that this activity happens regularly.”
“To do this, the team is proposing a follow-up post in the next several weeks that talks more broadly about our anti-scraping work and provides more transparency around the amount of work we’re doing in this area,” the message continues. “While this may reflect a significant volume of scraping activity, we hope this will help to normalize the fact that this activity is ongoing and avoid criticism that we aren’t being transparent about particular incidents.”
The thread also includes lists of existing global coverage surrounding the story, such as by ZDNet, CNET, Graham Cluley, Reuters, The Guardian, and The Wall Street Journal, to name a few; broadcast coverage, and tweets considered “notable,” as well as statistics on social conversion and mentions on Twitter.
While describing overall coverage, the email says that publications “have offered more critical takes of Facebook’s response framing it as evasive, a deflection of blame and absent of an apology for the users impacted.”
Tomi Engdahl says:
Avaaz:
Research: 56% of fact-checked COVID-19 misinformation content in major non-English European languages is not acted upon by Facebook
Left Behind: How Facebook is neglecting Europe’s infodemic
As Europe enters a third COVID-19 wave, our research finds that Facebook is failing to protect
https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/facebook_neglect_europe_infodemic/
Europeans from dangerous misinformation. Facebook promised to do more to protect its users, but a year after the start of the pandemic, our findings suggest it has not improved its ability to detect dangerous misinformation, emphasising the need for urgent EU regulations.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Miksi jokaisen yrityksen pitää tehdä blogitekstejä?
“Normaaleiden” syiden lisäksi tähän tulee vaikuttamaan GDPR-asiat sekä Googlen päätös lopettaa kolmannen osapuolen evästeiden käyttö Chrome-selaimessaan. Muutokset tulevat voimaan vuoden 2022 aikana, joten siihen hyvä valmistautua jo nyt.
Katso kaikki syyt ja tarkemmat tiedot täältä: https://www.innoclub.fi/miksi-jokaisen-yrityksen-pitaisi-tehda-blogiteksteja/
Tomi Engdahl says:
Coding experts tell Salon Mike Lindell’s botched social site was doomed to fail
https://www.salon.com/2021/04/23/coding-experts-tell-salon-mike-lindells-botched-social-site-was-doomed-to-fail/
One “grandmaster” in the content software Drupal describes Lindell’s social platform as “not even student work”
MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell’s social media site FRANK is facing ridicule from the community of “grandmasters” around the content management software Drupal, who say Lindell’s site was destined to fail from the start because his developers failed to take “elementary” coding steps to limit attacks from outside forces. Since its supposed “VIP launch” last Thursday night, Lindell’s platform has experienced numerous crashes, and at this writing on Thursday evening the site remains down.
Drupal’s site explains that its software is “used to make many of the websites and applications you use every day. Drupal has great standard features, like easy content authoring, reliable performance, and excellent security.” Drupal is open source, meaning that anyone can download it or modify it as they please — but it helps if they know what they’re doing.
Tomi Engdahl says:
ANDROID INTELLIGENCE ADVICE
4 new hidden Chrome features you should really be using
Google’s Chrome browser has some incredibly handy new options on both Android and the desktop, but it’s up to you to find ‘em.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3615701/new-chrome-features.html
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://vierityspalkki.fi/2021/04/09/evastelupakysely-asiallisesti-esimerkkeja-verkkokaupoista/
Tomi Engdahl says:
I cut Google out of my life for 2 weeks, but the alternatives prove why Google is so much better
https://www.businessinsider.com/google-chrome-drive-youtube-gmail-out-of-life-2018-11
Tomi Engdahl says:
NFTs and AI Are Unsettling the Very Concept of History
Non-fungible tokens and artificial intelligence make tracing the origins of a digital object more fragile. What are the world’s archivists to do?
https://www.wired.com/story/nfts-and-ai-are-unsettling-the-very-concept-of-history/
As an archivist, I’m excited about what disruptive innovations like non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and artificial intelligence may mean for archives. But I’m also worried. These developments pose existential threats to our field, and by extension, to the survival of human history and culture.
In 1999 the future of our archives was to be consumed, to enrich public memory with new evidence without hassle. I wanted our archives to be as ubiquitous as infrastructure, to work their way into every corner of the net, to propagate everywhere without need for attribution or credit. I wanted our archives to vanish in the web.
But now the survival of archives as we know them is uncertain. Whether we know it or not, we all rely on a patchwork of chronically underfunded public and private institutions that hold the world’s histories and cultural heritages in trust for all of us and make them accessible. Every time we see an old photo, hear a historical recording, see a news clip, or find a family history document, it likely originated in an archive. While we see and touch massive digital archives online, most archives are still largely undigitized collections of physical media like film, video, music, photographs, and paper documents. By design, archives are deliberate and thoughtful, with a timeline designed to preserve culture “forever.” They’re not built to nimbly weather disruption.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Journalismin transformaation printistä digialustoille luo tarvetta hienosäätää kieltä, käyttää uusia termejä. ”Editorials will still be called editorials, but the articles written by outside writers will be known as “Guest Essays,” a title that will appear prominently above the headline.”
Why The New York Times Is Retiring the Term ‘Op-Ed’
April 26, 2021
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/26/opinion/nyt-opinion-oped-redesign.html?referringSource=articleShare
Kathleen Kingsbury
By Kathleen Kingsbury
Leer en español
The first Op-Ed page in The New York Times greeted the world on Sept. 21, 1970. It was so named because it appeared opposite the editorial page and not (as many still believe) because it would offer views contrary to the paper’s. Inevitably, it would do that, too, since its founders were putting out a welcome mat for ideas and arguments from many points on the political, social and cultural spectrums from outside the walls of The Times — to stimulate thought and provoke discussion of public problems.
That important mission remains the same. But it’s time to change the name. The reason is simple: In the digital world, in which millions of Times readers absorb the paper’s journalism online, there is no geographical “Op-Ed,” just as there is no geographical “Ed” for Op-Ed to be opposite to. It is a relic of an older age and an older print newspaper design.
Tomi Engdahl says:
If you haven’t already been testing and monitoring your site with our automated web expert Poe, now’s a good time to do so.
Hope you like the new site: https://attractive.ai/
Tomi Engdahl says:
Why it’s easier to move country than switch social media
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/social-media-competitive-compatibility#intcid=_wired-uk-bottom-recirc_e393018d-fd7a-4048-9643-f9db6ae02680_entity-topic-similarity-v2
When we talk about social media monopolies, we focus too much on network effects, and not enough on switching costs. It’s time to tear down the walls
When we talk about social media monopolies, we focus too much on network effects, and not enough on switching costs. Yes, it’s true that all your friends are already stuck in a Big Tech silo that doesn’t talk to any of the other Big Tech silos. It needn’t be that way: interoperable platforms have existed since the first two Arpanet nodes came online. You can phone anyone with a phone number and email anyone with an email address.
The reason you can’t talk to Facebook users without having a Facebook account isn’t that it’s technically impossible – it’s that Facebook forbids it.
Facebook (and its Big Tech rivals) have the law on their side: the once-common practice of making new products that just work with existing ones (like third-party printer ink, or a Mac program that can read Microsoft Office files, or an emulator that can play old games) has been driven to the brink of extinction by Big Tech. They were fine with this kind of “competitive compatibility” when it benefited them, but now that they dominate the digital world, it’s time for it to die.
To restore competitive compatibility, we would need reform to many laws: software copyright and patents, the anti-circumvention laws that protect digital rights management, and the cybersecurity laws that let companies criminalize violations of their terms of service.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Apple is Holding the Web Back with ‘Uniquely Underpowered’ iOS Browsers, Reveals Google Engineer
https://wccftech.com/apple-is-holding-the-web-back-with-uniquely-underpowered-ios-browsers-reveals-google-engineer/
The big battle between Epic Games and Apple is currently in the process, and one of the key arguments that Apple has raised in the case si that developers have a choice that allows them to distribute “apps” for iOS through the web. However, a Google engineer has stepped forward against Apple’s practices on the web and has even gone to the extent of calling iOS browsers “uniquely underpowered.”
It is important to make a point that the web, as we know, it is no longer what it used to be. Nowadays, one can do pretty much anything they want to do through a web app, everything ranging from the ability to stream content and edit pictures, documents, and whatever they wish to. Regardless of what a user is doing, everything comes back to the browser. A few browser engines aid the process, starting from Chromium, which Google Chrome runs on.
However, Apple uses WebKit, which is what Alex Russel, Google’s engineer wants to talk about.
iOS Web Browsers Severely Undermine App Developer’s Attempt to Publish Web-Based Apps
When on iOS, Apple wants all the browsers to run WebKit. Even Google Chrome is forced to use WebKit on iOS devices.
In a blog post, Alex has gone ahead and talked about how the WebKit and iOS browsers are “Uniquely Underpowered” compared to the other modern browsers. He claims that Apple “consistently” delays new features for its browsers that “hold the key to unlocking whole categories of experiences on the web.”
Progress Delayed Is Progress Denied
https://infrequently.org/2021/04/progress-delayed/
Do App Store policies harm developers? Is the web a credible alternative? A look at the data.
Twitter
Progress Delayed Is Progress Denied
Do App Store policies harm developers? Is the web a credible alternative? A look at the data.
April 30, 2021
Updated: May 2, 2021
Three facts…
Apple bars web apps from the only App Store allowed on iOS.[1]
Apple forces developers of competing browsers to use their engine for all browsers on iOS, restricting their ability to deliver a better version of the web platform.
Apple claims that browsers on iOS are platforms sufficient to support developers who object to the App Store’s terms .
…and a proposition:
Apple’s iOS browser (Safari) and engine (WebKit) are uniquely under-powered. Consistent delays in the delivery of important features ensure the web can never be a credible alternative to its proprietary tools and App Store.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Pandemic leaves Kosovo without printed daily newspapers
https://apnews.com/article/europe-kosovo-health-coronavirus-newspapers-7271839b973f67d3af6ddbf88a6f7fba
Imer Mushkolaj, a journalist, dreams of once more drinking his morning coffee while flipping through the daily papers.
Until March last year Kosovo had five daily newspapers, though they all had small circulations. One of them, Koha, sold about 10,000 copies a day at times when the news was most interesting.
Since the start of the pandemic, there have been no more newspapers physically printed in Kosovo, only online versions. The pandemic was “the final straw, unfortunately turning Kosovo into the only country in Europe, maybe wider, without a daily paper,” said Mushkolaj.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Shoshana Wodinsky / Gizmodo:
Signal says Facebook shut down its ad account over an Instagram ad campaign that showed the user data Facebook used in targeting the ads
Signal Tries to Run the Most Honest Facebook Ad Campaign Ever, Immediately Gets Banned [Updated]
https://gizmodo.com/signal-tried-to-run-the-most-honest-facebook-ad-campaig-1846823457?scrolla=5eb6d68b7fedc32c19ef33b4
A series of Instagram ads run by the privacy-positive platform Signal got the messaging app booted from the former’s ad platform, according to a blog post Signal published on Tuesday. The ads were meant to show users the bevy of data that Instagram and its parent company Facebook collects on users, by… targeting those users using Instagram’s own adtech tools.
The actual idea behind the ad campaign is pretty simple. Because Instagram and Facebook share the same ad platform, any data that gets hoovered up while you’re scrolling your Insta or Facebook feeds gets fed into the same cesspool of data, which can be used to target you on either platform later.
Across each of these platforms, you’re also able to target people using a nearly infinite array of data points collected by Facebook’s herd of properties.
Based on this kind of minute data, Signal was able to create some super-targeted ads that were branded with the exact targeting specs that Signal used. If an ad was targeted towards K-pop fans, the ad said so. If the ad was targeted towards a single person, the ad said so. And if the ad was targeted towards London-based divorcees with degrees in art history, the ad said so.
Apparently, Facebook wasn’t a fan of this sort of transparency into its system. While the company hasn’t yet responded to Gizmodo’s request for comment, Signal’s blog post says that the ad account used to run these ads was shut down before these ads could reach their target audiences. Personally, I think that’s a shame—I’d have loved to see an ad that showed what Instagram really thinks of me.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Elizabeth Culliford / Reuters:
Twitter says it received a record 49,000 responses globally to a survey on handling world leaders who break Twitter’s rules
Twitter hears from record respondents over world leader rules
https://www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-hears-record-respondents-over-world-leader-rules-2021-05-04/
The company has received nearly 49,000 responses globally in 14 languages, the spokeswoman said. Its month-long survey asked questions like whether world leaders breaking Twitter’s rules should face “greater or lesser” consequences then other users and whether it was ever appropriate for Twitter to permanently suspend the account of a current president or prime minister.
U.S. President Donald Trump is seen tapping the screen on a mobile phone during a roundtable discussion on the reopening of small businesses in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., June 18, 2020. REUTERS/Leah Millis
U.S. President Donald Trump is seen tapping the screen on a mobile phone during a roundtable discussion on the reopening of small businesses in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., June 18, 2020. REUTERS/Leah Millis
Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) has received a record number of responses to a survey on how it should handle world leaders on its site, a spokeswoman said on Tuesday, an issue in the spotlight ahead of the possible return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to Facebook.
Twitter, which permanently banned Trump after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, in March began soliciting the public for input on whether world leaders should be subject to the same rules as other users and if they break a rule, what type of action should be taken.
The company has received nearly 49,000 responses globally in 14 languages, the spokeswoman said. Its month-long survey asked questions like whether world leaders breaking Twitter’s rules should face “greater or lesser” consequences then other users and whether it was ever appropriate for Twitter to permanently suspend the account of a current president or prime minister.
“As our teams review and distill the data, we’ve been looking for key themes, new ideas, and creative thinking so we can begin to develop an update to our approach and consider next steps,” the spokeswoman said. She declined to say at this time what the responses showed about users’ views.
The survey also presented users with a random sample of hypothetical scenarios, asking in one survey what they thought Twitter should do if their president posted COVID-19 misinformation or if another country’s candidate for the national head of agriculture tweeted that the military would destroy a group of people.
Multiple-choice answers ranged from “take no action” to restricting engagement with the tweet to “permanently suspend the account immediately.”
Twitter has said its ban on Trump, which it enacted due to the “risk of further incitement of violence,” will remain even if he runs for office again.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_img.asp
Tomi Engdahl says:
Western-style press freedom proves to be increasingly decaying
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202105/1222619.shtml#.YJDM5Y6gRfQ.facebook
Today is the World Press Freedom Day. Regrettably, press freedom is entirely defined under the Western political system framework, neglecting the social reality of many developing countries. This has led to significant ideological divergence between developing countries and the West, spearheaded by the US. And, the difference is exacerbated by the West’s geopolitical attacks on others. As a result, the political conditions that could help the two sides to bridge their difference have lost ground, with ideological conflicts increasingly being intensified.
Western-style press freedom is formed under a multi-party system, subject to powerful capitals or groups. A similar political environment doesn’t exist in countries like China. The attractiveness of Western-style press freedom was the result of the West’s successful governance in the past.
However, as most Western countries encounter rising problems in governance, the world’s view about Western-style press freedom will gradually change.
As a matter of fact, the myth of Western-style press freedom has long been shattered.
Tomi Engdahl says:
It is worth noting that Chinese society is fully aware that there is room for improvement in perfecting China’s press and information system. However, the US and the West won’t admit their press and information system has problems. They are indulged in a kind of ridiculous self-esteem, deluding themselves that their news and information system is most advanced in the world. And, some radicals in the West have weaponized the concept of press freedom in a bid to muddle the water and meet their geopolitical goals. These so-called political and media elites are, actually, very shallow and selfish.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202105/1222619.shtml#.YJDM5Y6gRfQ.facebook
Tomi Engdahl says:
European Parliament confirms new online censorship powers
EU regulation against ‘terrorist’ content online (TERREG) was approved without a final vote by the European Parliament on April 29th. The regulation will harm our ability to freely express ourselves and access information online.
European Parliament confirms new online censorship powers
https://edri.org/our-work/european-parliament-confirms-new-online-censorship-powers/
EU regulation against ‘terrorist’ content online (TERREG) was approved without a final vote by the European Parliament on April 29th. The regulation will harm our ability to freely express ourselves and access information online.
European Digital Rights (EDRi), Access Now, the Civil Liberties Union for Europe (Liberties) and Wikimedia Deutschland, supported by 75 human rights and digital rights organisations, journalist associations, academics and affected groups, deeply regret that representatives of EU residents ignored repeated warnings against the dangers that the proposal poses for European values and fundamental rights.
“The Regulation allows an EU state to request the removal, within the hour, of content hosted in another country on the grounds that it is ‘terrorist’ content. What this means is that somebody like Viktor Orban could ask for the removal of content uploaded in another country because it criticises his government.”
Eva Simon, Senior Advocacy Officer, Liberties
“To comply with TERREG, many platforms may use automated decision making systems to remove content, which is problematic. Machine learning systems for detection and identification of potentially illegal content are context blind and commit errors that are ultimately paid for by users’ fundamental rights and freedoms. While fighting against the terrorism is an important objective, TERREG will actually hurt freedom of expression for people across Europe and beyond, and miss its mark.”
Eliška Pírková, Europe Policy Analyst, Access Now
The result is that important public debates that help society understand, monitor and deal with terrorism get categorised incorrectly and could just be censored.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Michael Holden / Reuters:
UK unveils Online Safety Bill which would fine social media firms up to 10% of revenue or £18M if they fail to address online abuses such as racist hate crimes — LONDON (Reuters) – Britain said on Wednesday a planned new law would see social media companies fined up to 10% of turnover …
UK unveils law to fine social media firms which fail to remove online abuse
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-politics-tech-idUSKBN2CS30C
LONDON (Reuters) – Britain said on Wednesday a planned new law would see social media companies fined up to 10% of turnover or 18 million pounds ($25 million) if they failed to stamp out online abuses such as racist hate crimes, while senior managers could also face criminal action.
The Online Safety Bill also seeks to strengthen the right to freedom of expression, and ensure democratic political debate and journalistic content is protected, the government said.
“It’s time for tech companies to be held to account and to protect the British people from harm. If they fail to do so, they will face penalties,” interior minister Priti Patel said.
Tomi Engdahl says:
EU is planning on unrealistic responsibilities for operators of core internet infrastructure, they need to know about consequences.
Dear EU: Please Don’t Ruin the Root
https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/dont-ruin-the-root/
now appears that the European Union might inadvertently be picking an ugly fight with “The Internet”.
What is going on? A new EU directive is currently making its way through the various EU bodies. This Proposal for directive on measures for high common level of cybersecurity across the Union is the successor of the initial attempt known as the NIS Directive.
This directive creates rules for “essential and important entities” so they adhere to minimum Cybersecurity standards. Although it is for now somewhat up in the air who exactly would count as such an entity, it is sure to include national telecommunication companies, Google and many other major communication hubs. Many of these are already regulated in various ways.
Surprisingly however, the European Commission version of the directive explicitly includes all the root servers, the infrastructure that keeps the internet alive.
The NIS 2 directive has an effect on all service providers that are essential to Europeans, regardless of where these entities are domiciled. In other words, this regulation would definitely apply to NASA and the US Department of Defense, because these operate root servers on which Europeans depend.
This means that with the advent of “NIS 2”, as the directive is also called, the EU would attempt to impose regulation on NASA, the US Department of Defense, but also non-profits like ISC, RIPE NCC, ICANN and the Japanese WIDE project.
Various root server operators took note and sent in their views to the EU: RIPE NCC, ISC, Netnod, ICANN.
So what are the NIS 2 obligations?
If these plans are found to be deficient, or if there is an incident, EU member states can order operators to take all measures to return to compliance. If an incident has occurred, and followup is not satisfactory, measures can include fines, on-site inspections, including random checks, mandatory audits, security scans and requests for evidence of promised improvements.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Monet yritykset perustavat koko kysyntästrategiansa liidien keräämiseen sähköpostimarkkinointia varten, mutta tuovatko uudet markkinointiliidit lopulta lisää liikevaihtoa? Tarjoamme vaihtoehtoisen näkemyksen siihen, kuinka voit lisätä myyntiä ilmaisen sisällön avulla. Lue lisää blogistamme!
Miksi liidimagneetit eivät toimi
https://thefcompany.com/fi/miksi-liidimagneetit-eivat-toimi/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=paidsocial&utm_campaign=TFC_Gated+content+blog_E2_04%2F21_FI_Awareness_Lookalikes&fbclid=IwAR1NnVmMvQmUQU9t9TjW-84b8AfeAHMlpugW-_p-K9EAlSjALL2p0DqB1DM
Pitäisikö sinun asettaa ladattava B2B-sisältösi yhteydenottolomakkeen taakse vai vapaasti saatavaksi kaikille? Tämä on yksi niistä kysymyksistä, joihin ei ole vain yhtä oikeaa vastausta, joka pätee tilanteessa kuin tilanteessa.
Vaikka “liidimagneetit” ovat yleisesti käytetty tapa kerätä liidejä ja niiden tarkoitus on hyvä, yhteystietojen jättämistä edellyttävään sisältöön liittyy myös sudenkuoppia, jotka voivat johtaa B2B-markkinoijat harhaan siitä, mikä on todella tärkeää. Keskustellaanpa siitä.
Auttavatko liidimagneetit keräämään liidejä?
Kyllä, ainakin paperilla. Liidimagneettien avulla on periaatteessa helppoa saada lisää liidejä. Siksi monet yritykset perustavat koko kysyntästrategiansa liidien keräämiseen sähköpostimarkkinointia varten: luo ladattava pdf-tiedosto, julkaise mainoksia, liidien lukumäärä kasvaa, sinulla on jotain raportoitavaa. Kiva! Sehän meni aivan niin kuin toivoit.
Paitsi että ongelmia voi tulla siinä vaiheessa, kun nämä liidit:
Eivät lopulta lisää myyntiä tai tuottoja, mikä varmasti tulisi ärsyttämään myyntitiimiäsi.
Eivät halua, että myyt heille, eli päätyisit vain ärsyttämään potentiaalisia asiakkaitasi. Kohdeyleisösi hukkuu sähköposteihin jo valmiiksi, eivätkä he lataa e-kirjaasi tai muuta sisältöä odottaen seuraavaksi innolla myyntisähköpostiasi.
Mutta tuottaako liidimagneetti arvoa yleisöllesi? Sitä on vaikeampi mitata kuin liidejä.
Miksi sinun kannattaisi laittaa sisältösi vapaasti yleisösi saataville
Ehdotan seuraavaa: luo laadukasta sisältöä ja laita se avoimesti ja ilmaiseksi B2B-yleisösi saataville. Ei yhteydenottolomakkeita, ei sähköpostien keruuta, eikä siis myöskään uusia liidejä raportoitavaksi. Pähkähullu idea, eikö vain? Vai onko sittenkään? Tämän olemme oppineet hoitaessamme huippuyritysten B2B-markkinointia vuosien ajan:
Ilmainen sisältö tekee ostajan työstä helpompaa
B2B-asiakaspolut ovat pitkiä ja monimutkaisia. Ne voivat kestää yli kuusi kuukautta, niihin voi osallistua yli seitsemän ihmistä, ja ne voivat sisältää satoja vuorovaikutuksia brändisi kanssa. Tämä tekee sekä myynnistä että ostamisesta melko haastavaa.
Tyypillisen B2B-ostajaryhmän on käytävä läpi kuusi vaihetta ennen kuin he ovat valmiita ostamaan:
Ongelman tunnistaminen. ”Meidän on tehtävä jotain.”
Ratkaisujen etsintä. ”Mitä on saatavilla?”
Vaatimusten määrittäminen. ”Mitä hankinnan pitää pystyä tekemään tai saavuttamaan?”
Toimittajan valinta. ”Saadaanko tällä aikaan sitä, mitä tarvitaan tai halutaan?”
Validointi. ”Luulemme tietävämme vastauksen, mutta meidän on oltava varmoja.”
Yhteisymmärryksen luominen. ”Meidän on saatava kaikki mukaan.”
Jos ostajat eivät pysty käymään näitä vaiheita läpi, he eivät voi ostaa sinulta. Niin yksinkertaista se on.
Siksi suosittelen sinua kehittämään sisältöstrategiaasi siten, että se auttaa ostajia tekemään työnsä paremmin sen sijaan, että huijaisit heitä antamaan sinulle sähköpostiosoitteensa. Loppujen lopuksi et varmaankaan halua lisätä kitkaa prosessiin, joka on jo valmiiksi näin monimutkainen.
Kun tarjoat sisältöä, joka auttaa ostajia etenemään tehtävästä toiseen, kasvatat Gartnerin mukaan mahdollisuutesi kaupantekoon kolminkertaiseksi. Jo se yksinään on hyvä syy olla piilottamatta tätä sisältöä yleisöltäsi.
Arvokkaat vuorovaikutustilanteet tuottavat kysyntää pitkällä aikavälillä
Arvokkaan sisällön tarjoaminen on tärkeä osa ostajan työn helpottamista. Siispä jos sisältösi on arvokasta, voisitko ainakin harkita, ettet rajoittaisi sitä yhteydenottolomakkeen taakse? Etkö ennemmin haluaisi, että mahdollisimman moni ihminen kohderyhmässäsi näkee sen? Silloinhan sinun kannattaisi varmistaa, että sisältösi löytäminen ja lukeminen on mahdollisimman helppoa.
Minun näkemykseni on tämä: kun asiakkaasi ovat valmiita ostamaan, he kääntyvät sen yrityksen puoleen, joka on tarjonnut heille eniten arvoa. Sen sijaan ne yritykset, jotka piilottavat laatusisältönsä, saavat jäädä nuolemaan näppejään.
Haluaisitko mieluummin saada aikaan 1000 arvokasta vuorovaikutustilannetta kohdeyleisösi kanssa vai 10 markkinointiliidiä kirjattavaksi CRM-järjestelmäänne? Lyhyellä aikavälillä markkinointiliidit ovat erinomaisia, koska niiden mittaaminen ja raportoiminen on helppoa. Mutta kuten tiedämme, liidit eivät aina johda myynnin tai tulojen kasvuun.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Why WordPress Will Soon Power 50% of All Websites
https://www.namecheap.com/blog/wordpress-market-share/
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://villivisio.fi/blogi/brandintappajat/
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.slashgear.com/facebook-shut-down-signals-ads-because-they-exposed-too-much-04671574/
Tomi Engdahl says:
Brändikirja auttaa yritystäsi vahvan brändin rakentamisessa
https://www.digimarkkinointi.fi/blogi/brandikirja
Brändikirja kokoaa ohjeet brändin tai yrityksen ilmeeseen ja viestintään sekä luo eräänlaiset ääriviivat minkä rajoissa kaiken yrityksen viestinnän tulisi tapahtua.
Mainokset, verkkosivut, esitysmateriaalit. Olet varmasti huomannut, että selkeän brändikuvan omaavien yritysten mainoksissa ja verkkosivuissa on havaittavissa selkeä yhtenäisyys. Tuo voidaan helpoiten saavuttaa soveltamalla samoja kuvia, värejä tai muotoja molemmissa paikoissa. Toinen tekijä, mikä vahvistaa tuota yhteyttä, on viestin tyyli. Mistä puhutaan ja miten?
Vahva brändi rakentuu, kun ihmiset saavat toistuvia samantyylisiä ärsykkeitä joko visuaalisesti tai ”äänellisesti”. Kun yhdistät näihin ärsykkeisiin yrityksesi, alkaa ärsykkeistä syntyä koko ajan vahvempi sidos yritykseesi ja yrityksesi brändiin. Ärsyke on suomen kielen sanana ehkä hieman negatiivissävytteinen, mutta siitä ei pidä nyt hämääntyä.
Eli yksinkertaisemmin sanottuna: Yrityksen tulisi säilyttää samanlainen ilme ja viestin tyyli kaikessa viestinnässään, jos se haluaa rakentaa vahvaa brändiä. Mikä on sitten hyvin yleinen ongelma?
Brändi-ilmeen osalta yleensä on määriteltynä:
logo ja sen käyttö
värit
typografia
kuvamaailma
muut graafiset elementit
Näiden lisäksi myös käytännön esimerkkejä kuinka ilmettä voidaan soveltaa eri käyttötarkoituksissa kuten some-mainoksissa tai verkkosivuilla.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Miksi jokaisen yrityksen pitäisi tehdä blogitekstejä?
Meiltä kysytään lähes jokaisessa markkinointiin ja mainontaan liittyvässä palaverissa, että ”onko meidän ihan pakko tehdä blogitekstejä?” Vastaus on: välttämättä juuri blogitekstejä ei ole pakko tehdä, mutta asiakkaillesi sopivaa sisältöä sinun on lähes välttämätöntä tuottaa.
Miksi siis blogitekstejä tai muuta sisältöä on pakko tehdä? Ja puhutaan nyt yksinkertaistamisen vuoksi pelkistä blogiteksteistä.
Huomio
Kun toimiva markkinointi perustuu siihen, että asiakas tuntee sinut ja luottaa sinuun, ovat blogitekstit tässä suhteessa äärimmäisen hyviä työkaluja
https://www.innoclub.fi/miksi-jokaisen-yrityksen-pitaisi-tehda-blogiteksteja/
Tomi Engdahl says:
USING DATASCRIPT AND STATIC EDN AS A SUPER-LIGHTWEIGHT CMS
https://blog.taiste.fi/en/using-datascript-and-static-edn-as-a-super-lightweight-cms
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.kooders.fi/blogi/yrityksen-palvelut-verkkoon?utm_campaign=Yrityksen%20palvelut%20verkkoon&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=paid&hsa_acc=10202172231020759&hsa_cam=6233150871702&hsa_grp=6233150872102&hsa_ad=6233150872502&hsa_src=fb&hsa_net=facebook&hsa_ver=3&fbclid=IwAR3AzRfmIBXAxDK7dIxiAblczzLQ4Stu1HHablioPpaT2p1mGP_fCiZb_wk
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.kauppalehti.fi/kumppanisisallot/mysafety/sananvapaus-on-ihmisoikeus-mutta-rajansa-sillakin/
Tomi Engdahl says:
Paperi loppuu
Maailma ei ole enää paperitehdas, kirjoittaa kolumnissaan Jari Tervo.
https://www.hs.fi/sunnuntai/art-2000007936785.html
Tomi Engdahl says:
Angular 12 improves performance and so much more
Progamming
•
Apr 24, 2021
Angular 12, a massive planned upgrade to Google’s popular TypeScript-based web framework. It has now moved to a release candidate stage – with the production version due somewhere in May. This upgrade bringing enhancements to performance, the compiler, DOM elements, and so much more.
https://sudosecurity.org/angular-12-released/
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.editorx.com/shaping-design/article/cognitive-biases
Tomi Engdahl says:
Matthew Gault / VICE:
Study: being corrected by another user for posting false political news increases subsequent sharing of low quality, partisan, and toxic content
Confronting Disinformation Spreaders on Twitter Only Makes It Worse, MIT Scientists Say
Twitter is a hellscape and it only gets worse when you point out some is sharing bad information.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/93ybay/confronting-disinformation-spreaders-on-twitter-only-makes-it-worse-mit-scientists-say
Of all the reply guy species, the most pernicious is the correction guy. You’ve seen him before, perhaps you’ve even been him. When someone (often a celebrity or politician) tweets bad science or a provable political lie, the correction guy is there to respond with the correct information. According to a new study conducted by researchers at MIT, being corrected online just makes the original posters more toxic and obnoxious.
Basically, the new thinking is that correcting fake news, disinformation, and horrible tweets at all is bad and makes everything worse. This is a “perverse downstream consequence for debunking,” and is the exact title of MIT research published in the ‘2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.’ The core takeaway is that “being corrected by another user for posting false political news increases subsequent sharing of low quality, partisan, and toxic content.”
The MIT researchers’ work is actually a continuation of their study into the effects of social media. This recent experiment started because the team had previously discovered something interesting about how people behave online. “In a recent paper published in Nature, we found that a simple accuracy nudge—asking people to judge the accuracy of a random headline—improved the quality of the news they shared afterward (by shifting their attention towards the concept of accuracy),” David Rand, an MIT researcher and co-author of the paper told Motherboard in an email.
“In the current study, we wanted to see whether a similar effect would happen if people who shared false news were directly corrected,” he said. “Direct correction could be an even more powerful accuracy prime—or, it could backfire by making people feel defensive or focusing their attention on social factors (eg embarrassment) rather than accuracy.”
After the reply guy bot butted in, the researchers watched the accounts to see what they’d tweet and retweet. “What we found was that getting corrected slightly decreased the quality of the news people retweeted afterward (and had no effect on primary tweets),” Rand said. “These results are a bit discouraging—it would have been great if direct corrections caused people to clean up their act and share higher quality news! But they emphasize the social element of social media. Getting publicly corrected for sharing falsehoods is a very social experience, and it’s maybe not so surprising that this experience could focus attention on social factors.”
Getting corrected by a reply guy didn’t change the way people tweeted, but it did make them retweet more false news, lean into their own partisan slant, and use more toxic language on Twitter. Rand and the rest of the team could only speculate as to why this occurred
“There is no question that social media has changed the way people interact. But understanding how exactly it’s changed things is really difficult. At the very least, it’s made it possible to have dialogue (be it constructive, or not so much) with people all over the world who otherwise you would never meet or interact with.”
Tomi Engdahl says:
The Mystery Of The Study That’s Been Cited 400 Times Despite Not Existing
https://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/the-mystery-of-the-study-thats-been-cited-400-times-despite-not-existing/
An article has come to light that has been cited in nearly 400 academic studies and scientific papers. There’s just one problem: it doesn’t exist.
As she explains in a blog post, he was looking at the Elsevier journal author style guide and found the following reference: “Van der Geer, J., Hanraads, J.A.J., Lupton, R.A., 2000. The art of writing a scientific article. Journal of Science Communications 163 (2) 51-59.”
Something seemed off. After some sleuthing around, Harzing discovered the article appeared to be completely fictional despite appearing in almost 400 studies. However, as she later found out, this was not a matter of fraud or deception with intent. It is actually a bizarrely common mistake.
Harzing says that most of the citations of the phantom reference were in “fairly low-quality conference papers”, often by researchers who were from countries “where there isn’t a strong tradition of writing in English.” It also became apparent that the phantom reference was regularly cited as the first article in the reference list.
It turns out, the citation is a made-up example from the science publisher Elsevier to show authors how to cite their work. The “phantom reference” simply ended up in researchers’ lists of citations by researchers mixing up the template with their own references, it seems.
Nevertheless, it seems that the phantom reference is a symptom of wider problems within academic science publishing, such as low-quality control, careless editing, and – the real bugbear – predatory journals.
https://harzing.com/publications/white-papers/the-mystery-of-the-phantom-reference
Tomi Engdahl says:
I can’t even tell the difference between troll, sarcasm and stupid anymore.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Why You Should Stop Using Nulled WordPress Plugins and Themes
https://kinsta.com/blog/nulled-wordpress-plugins-themes/
Because people are always on the lookout for ways to cut costs, some WordPress users are tempted to turn to nulled WordPress themes and plugins instead of paying for the official premium version.
In this post, we’re going to tell you why using nulled WordPress plugins and themes is a bad idea…even if it’s not necessarily breaking any laws.
What Are Considered Nulled Plugins and Themes?
There are various definitions around the web when it comes to the term nulled. As we define nulled it refers to premium WordPress plugins or themes that have been hacked or contain modified code designed to cause harm or collect information. These are obtained from a third-party website (not the original author or creator) and sometimes are made to work without a license key.
Nulled WordPress Plugins and Themes Aren’t Necessarily Illegal
Let’s start with the elephant in the room…
It’s unlikely that the FBI kicks down your door if you use nulled WordPress plugins or themes. That’s because, in contrast to the other content that people usually “pirate” (e.g. music, movies), nulled WordPress plugins and themes are often not breaking the law.
The reason here has to do with the GPL (General Public License). Without making this a lesson on copyright, you just need to know that part of what the GPL license allows for is that anyone can freely distribute GPL-licensed software (yes – even premium GPL-licensed software).
So if a nulled plugin site puts a piece of GPL-licensed software up for download, they’re not technically breaking the law because they have the right to freely distribute that GPL code.
The GPL is a big part of WordPress, and most (but not necessarily all) WordPress themes and plugins use GPL.
But basically – most of the nulled WordPress plugins and themes that you see are probably not doing anything illegal. In fact, GPL is one reason why WordPress is great.
But that doesn’t mean you should go out and pack your site full of nulled extensions…
Four Reasons You Still Should NOT Use Nulled WordPress Extensions (Even If They’re Legal)
Just because nulled extensions are legal, that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to use them at your WordPress site.
Here are four reasons why you still shouldn’t use nulled plugins or themes on your site.
You Don’t Know What Else Is in the Code
Developers Need Money To Continue Improving Their Products
You Won’t Get Any Support From The Developer
You Won’t Get Any Automatic Updates
Tomi Engdahl says:
No more fuzzy pictures? The end of an era!
Cloudflare says it’s time to end CAPTCHA ‘madness’, launches new security key-based replacement
It works great, but don’t expect CAPTCHAs to disappear just yet
https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2021/5/16/22436395/cloudflare-end-captcha-madness-security-key-cryptographic-attestation-of-personhood
Tomi Engdahl says:
“Lähtötilanne markkinointiviestinnässä on usein se, että ketään ei kiinnosta.”
Miten horros tappaa brändin?
https://villivisio.fi/blogi/horros/?utm_campaign=2021-05+%E2%80%93+RETA%3A+Br%C3%A4ndintappajat+%E2%80%93+Landing+page+views&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=paid&hsa_acc=10151938257876402&hsa_cam=6246837070964&hsa_grp=6246837071164&hsa_ad=6247600551364&hsa_src=fb&hsa_net=facebook&hsa_ver=3&fbclid=IwAR23oAYAkcsWP-FzIlW8uQZG0Qad5ktYwWLeQtzAPn1LDqQu3sxlD-JdN9Q
Ihmisillä on taipumus vaipua horrokseen ja jatkaa tasaisessa liikkeessä, aivan kuten aina ennenkin, ellei heihin kohdistu muutosta aiheuttavaa voimaa. Tuo brändintappaja on horros, joka pitää myös asiakkaat muuttumattomina tai vähintään tahmeina. Ja se asettuu poikkiteloin tiellesi, kun haluat ihmisten kiinnostuvan brändistäsi.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Microsoft is finally retiring Internet Explorer in 2022 https://www.theverge.com/2021/5/19/22443997/microsoft-internet-explorer-end-of-support-date
We are announcing that the future of Internet Explorer on Windows 10 is in Microsoft Edge, says Sean Lyndersay, a Microsoft Edge program manager. The Internet Explorer 11 desktop application will be retired and go out of support on June 15, 2022, for certain versions of Windows 10.