Here are some of the the major AI trends shaping 2026 — based on current expert forecasts, industry reports, and recent developments in technology. The material is analyzed using AI tools and final version hand-edited to this blog text:
1. Generative AI Continues to Mature
Generative AI (text, image, video, code) will become more advanced and mainstream, with notable growth in:
* Generative video creation
* Gaming and entertainment content generation
* Advanced synthetic data for simulations and analytics
This trend will bring new creative possibilities — and intensify debates around authenticity and copyright.
2. AI Agents Move From Tools to Autonomous Workers
Rather than just answering questions or generating content, AI systems will increasingly act autonomously, performing complex, multi-step workflows and interacting with apps and processes on behalf of users — a shift sometimes called agentic AI. These agents will become part of enterprise operations, not just assistant features.
3. Smaller, Efficient & Domain-Specific Models
Instead of “bigger is always better,” specialized AI models tailored to specific industries (healthcare, finance, legal, telecom, manufacturing) will start to dominate in many enterprise applications. These models are more accurate, legally compliant, and cost-efficient than general models.
4. AI Embedded Everywhere
AI won’t be an add-on feature — it will be built into everyday software and devices:
* Office apps with intelligent drafting, summarization, and task insights
* Operating systems with native AI
* Edge devices processing AI tasks locally
This makes AI pervasive in both work and consumer contexts.
5. AI Infrastructure Evolves: Inference & Efficiency Focus
More investment is going into inference infrastructure — the real-time decision-making step where models run in production — thereby optimizing costs, latency, and scalability. Enterprises are also consolidating AI stacks for better governance and compliance.
6. AI in Healthcare, Research, and Sustainability
AI is spreading beyond diagnostics into treatment planning, global health access, environmental modeling, and scientific discovery. These applications could help address personnel shortages and speed up research breakthroughs.
7. Security, Ethics & Governance Become Critical
With AI handling more sensitive tasks, organizations will prioritize:
* Ethical use frameworks
* Governance policies
* AI risk management
This trend reflects broader concerns about trust, compliance, and responsible deployment.
8. Multimodal AI Goes Mainstream
AI systems that understand and generate across text, images, audio, and video will grow rapidly, enabling richer interactions and more powerful applications in search, creative work, and interfaces.
9. On-Device and Edge AI Growth
10. New Roles: AI Manager & Human-Agent Collaboration
Instead of replacing humans, AI will shift job roles:
* People will manage, supervise, and orchestrate AI agents
* Human expertise will focus on strategy, oversight, and creative judgment
This human-in-the-loop model becomes the norm.
Sources:
[1]: https://www.brilworks.com/blog/ai-trends-2026/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “7 AI Trends to Look for in 2026″
[2]: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2025/10/13/10-generative-ai-trends-in-2026-that-will-transform-work-and-life/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “10 Generative AI Trends In 2026 That Will Transform Work And Life”
[3]: https://millipixels.com/blog/ai-trends-2026?utm_source=chatgpt.com “AI Trends 2026: The Key Enterprise Shifts You Must Know | Millipixels”
[4]: https://www.digitalregenesys.com/blog/top-10-ai-trends-for-2026?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Digital Regenesys | Top 10 AI Trends for 2026″
[5]: https://www.n-ix.com/ai-trends/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “7 AI trends to watch in 2026 – N-iX”
[6]: https://news.microsoft.com/source/asia/2025/12/11/microsoft-unveils-7-ai-trends-for-2026/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Microsoft unveils 7 AI trends for 2026 – Source Asia”
[7]: https://www.risingtrends.co/blog/generative-ai-trends-2026?utm_source=chatgpt.com “7 Generative AI Trends to Watch In 2026″
[8]: https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/12/24/artificial-intelligence-ai-trends-to-watch-in-2026/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “3 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trends to Watch in 2026 and How to Invest in Them | The Motley Fool”
[9]: https://www.reddit.com//r/AI_Agents/comments/1q3ka8o/i_read_google_clouds_ai_agent_trends_2026_report/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “I read Google Cloud’s “AI Agent Trends 2026” report, here are 10 takeaways that actually matter”
876 Comments
Tomi Engdahl says:
Inside Cox Automotive’s drive to engineer agentic AI
https://www.cio.com/article/4137545/inside-cox-automotives-drive-to-engineer-agentic-ai.html
Tomi Engdahl says:
Taalas is replacing programmable GPUs with hardwired AI chips to achieve 17,000 tokens per second for ubiquitous inference
https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/02/22/taalas-is-replacing-programmable-gpus-with-hardwired-ai-chips-to-achieve-17000-tokens-per-second-for-ubiquitous-inference/
Tomi Engdahl says:
5 Vibe Coding Use Cases Every Company Can Start Using Today
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2026/02/23/5-vibe-coding-use-cases-every-company-can-start-using-today/
Vibe coding is opening a new door for businesses, building useful tools and simple applications with AI by describing what you want, then iterating in real time. It shrinks the distance between an idea and a working prototype, which makes it easier for teams to solve everyday problems without waiting in a long development queue.
In practical terms, vibe coding helps remove a common bottleneck: the gap between business needs and engineering capacity. When people closest to the work can create lightweight solutions themselves, organizations can test ideas faster, reduce friction in internal processes, and learn what actually delivers value.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://techxplore.com/news/2026-02-jailbreaking-matrix-bypassing-ai-guardrails.html
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.xda-developers.com/notebooklm-is-powerful-but-claude-better-at-handling-unorganized-notes/
Tomi Engdahl says:
Intel shifts customer support to AI-powered assistant after scaling back phone support — “Ask Intel” system built on Microsoft Copilot Studio
News
By Luke James published February 22, 2026
‘Ask Intel’ rolled out to handle warranty checks and troubleshooting as part of a broader support overhaul.
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/intel-shifts-customer-support-to-microsoft-copilot-studio
Tomi Engdahl says:
Multi-agent workflows often fail. Here’s how to engineer ones that don’t.
Most multi-agent workflow failures come down to missing structure, not model capability. Learn the three engineering patterns that make agent systems reliable.
https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/multi-agent-workflows-often-fail-heres-how-to-engineer-ones-that-dont/
Tomi Engdahl says:
Microsoft’s Copilot push irks customers, stirs FTC
analysis
Feb 24, 2026
6 mins
https://www.infoworld.com/article/4136202/microsofts-copilot-push-irks-customers-stirs-ftc.html
Pushing Copilot on customers raises antitrust concerns as the end of Windows 10 forces hardware purchases and customer frustrations mount.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Tech jobs are getting demolished in ways not seen since 2008 and the dot-com bust : https://mrf.lu/mF6n
Tomi Engdahl says:
AI and the learning revolution:
Key skills for instructional designers in 2026
The world of elearning is evolving—fast. Keeping up is hard. So stop running and read this report: a structured roadmap to mastering AI so you can futureproof your skills and beat out the bots.
https://www.learnworlds.com/resources/guides/five-layers-ai-expertise-instructional-design/
Tomi Engdahl says:
Bubbling Up
Blinking New Warning Sign Appears for AI Industry
Wall Street is terrified of what could come next.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/blinking-new-warning-sign-ai-industry?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQYm1ljbGNrBBibJWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHn0Yok6-nHu-0E_0Rxw4mJR1GG0bLDwjUUEyo58VPAOvL_UW9JTEy9R_0LVG_aem_KZrtzjz47BTE_IJ8_TDRUw
Investors have been rattled by the enormous amount of money AI companies are committing to spend on infrastructure buildouts. Amazon alone saw its share price drop precipitously earlier this month after announcing that it’s planning to spend $200 billion this year on AI. Microsoft’s shares also plummeted after stoking fears that a return on AI investment may be even further off than expected.
In total, big tech companies are predicted to spend a record-breaking $650 billion on AI in 2026 alone, astronomical commitments that have Wall Street seriously on edge.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Ghost Town
Evidence Grows That Google’s AI Overviews Have Eviscerated the Media Industry
It’s hard times for the digital media-sphere.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/google-ai-overviews-media?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQZb9tjbGNrBBlvr2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHqESEdVSsopcednRSKlL4WCWSt0XOuIUR8oVmx6G9t9a_a8L7y9PeIUs9MWA_aem_SFu6gStbnHrlt0wwX_wcJA
Media workers aren’t so much being replaced by AI systems as fed to one: Google’s gluttonous AI Overviews, which summarize articles and present them to users in one easy-to-read digest.
But while users might be shaving precious seconds from their queries, online media publications are being roiled by the massive drop-off in clicks. That web traffic, SEO firm Growtika found, has dropped off significantly following the advent of Google’s AI Overviews.
The firm looked at data from Ahrefs tracking web traffic to 10 major tech outlets from early 2024 to early 2026. At their peak, the media companies brought in 112 million site visits per month from Google users in the US. By January of this year, that number was down to a little under 50 million — with some outlets losing over 90 percent of their traffic since the new feature rolled out.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-mass-unmask-pseudonymous-accounts?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQZcKNjbGNrBBlwkGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoCZD7UWUHozRlOJNzzf-SudhqL4pjGp9DxX7JWgZUSlmXrQVmVf7ECdsqsy_aem_ZkStYeKSeTm117t1qSx7FA
Tomi Engdahl says:
Agnus Amodei
Dario Amodei Says Trump Is Mad That He Hasn’t Given Him “Dictator-Style Praise”
Knives out.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/dario-amodei-trump-dictator?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQZ_ZZjbGNrBBn8_mV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHkN5Ngjft9QN0eiggyFsFZFa2wQqSNqbtLK4LIgW2Pjmj6LdwMINnyrmD3Pp_aem_o6yQmNTR_xjpjqadIG6xlA
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s insistence that the company’s AI models may not be used for mass surveillance of Americans or directing killer drones has kicked up a major storm.
Defense secretary Pete Hegseth and president Donald Trump came out swinging, directing all government agencies to stop using the company’s software “effective immediately” and labeling the company as a “supply chain risk,” sending shockwaves across the entire tech industry.
Very little love has been lost between the AI leader and the White House. In a leaked Friday memo to employees obtained by The Information, Amodei ignited the powder keg by calling out the president — as well as his arch nemesis and fellow OpenAI cofounder Sam Altman for bending the knee.
“The real reasons [Department of War] and the Trump admin do not like us is that we haven’t donated to Trump,” he wrote, adding that “we haven’t given dictator-style praise to Trump (while Sam has).”
It’s true that OpenAI president Greg Brockman has donated $25 million to a Trump super PAC. Altman also donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund in late 2024.
After talks between Anthropic and the Pentagon fell apart — a feud that reportedly started after Anthropic’s Claude was found to have been used during the attacks on Venezuela — Altman seemingly saw an opportunity to swoop in and cash in, triggering a major PR crisis as a considerable number of users accused the company of giving in to the Trump administration’s demands.
In the memo, Amodei also argued that “we have supported AI regulation, which is against their agenda, we’ve told the truth about a number of AI policy issues (like job displacement), and we’ve actually held our red lines with integrity rather than colluding with them to produce ‘safety theater’ for the benefit of employees.”
Tomi Engdahl says:
Submit
Manager at Associated Press Tells Journalists That Resistance to AI Is Futile
“Resistance is futile” — famously a phrase said by the good guys.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/manager-associated-resistance-ai-futile?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQaJKJjbGNrBBokcWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHrp-c_OHUYA6ZKXXtMGmeklHzgaxNnLOefewpMnvynUwMsos4zKxgXB_TWWO_aem_2rFVcC29d2MH5GHth91Z1A
One senior figure at the Associated Press appears to have caught a terminal case of tech CEO brain.
According to new reporting by Semafor, the news wire’s product manager for AI strategy Aimee Rinehart embraced her inner “Star Trek” villain by bluntly telling her stuck-in-the-past, pencil-pushing grunts that resistance to AI is “futile.” Reporters, not heeding her warning, rebelled anyway.
The internal controversy played out as AP staffers discussed how the Cleveland paper The Plain Dealer embraced using an “AI rewrite specialist” to turn reporters’ field notes into full-blown articles. The paper’s editor had lamented how an intern pulled out of a reporting fellowship after discovering that the position required feeding notes into an AI writing tool instead of writing stories.
“Because local newsrooms are so strapped, they are turning for assistance on the news making process in every direction,” Rinehart wrote in a company Slack message. “Advance Publications got there first, others will follow,” she added, referring to the Plain Dealer’s publisher. “Resistance is futile.”
Spinning a yarn, Rinehart also claimed that some editors told her that they would “prefer to have reporters report and have articles at least pre-written by AI.”
“There are many — and I mean MANY — editors who would prefer an AI-written article to a human-written one,” she wrote. “Reporting and writing are two different skill sets and rare — RARE — is the occasion when it’s wrapped into one person.”
One AP reporter fumed that the “dismissiveness and disdain some of you have shown for human writing are insulting and abhorrent,” per Semafor. “Strong reporting and clear writing are the lifeblood of journalism, not AI-written slop.”
“AI may be inevitable,” the reporter continued, “but denigrating the work of colleagues who write for a living without whom there would be no AP, is disgraceful.”
The internal strife comes as news organizations experiment with AI, despite it remaining controversial with rank and file journalists, and frequently causing mistakes.
In December, The Washington Post launched an AI-generated podcast feature for summarizing a personalized curation of the paper’s latest stories to users. Prone to hallucinating like any other AI tech, the podcasts turned out to be riddled with factual errors like fabricated quotes, along with editorializing on developing stories. Readers mocked the initiative, and WaPo staffers rebelled against management, blasting the AI launch as a “disaster.”
Last month, a senior Ars Technica reporter was caught accidentally using AI-fabricated quotes in an article, forcing the publication to issue a retraction in an incident that went viral.
When the AI erroneously generated a made-up quote based on the real remarks the source made in an interview, it went unnoticed, underscoring how the tech’s introduction can lull even veterans into a false sense of security and lead to outright fabrications. Edwards was terminated by Ars following the incident.
In a statement to Semafor, the AP stated that the “internal discussion among staffers from different departments doesn’t reflect the overall position of the AP regarding the use of AI.”
“We’ve been an industry leader in setting AI standards that safeguard the vital role of journalists,” the statement continued, “while also allowing for AI use for things like language translation, summarizations, transcriptions and content tagging.”
Tomi Engdahl says:
They are not wrong. The winner is not human or AI, the winner is human PLUS AI.
Tomi Engdahl says:
What is with people and this weird, messiac A.I. worship? Most labor jobs cannot be automated and most companies are not seeing any vast returns from implementation.
The A.I. boom will be more akin to the dot com bubble. Investors are already panicking.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Anthropic says its #Claude model found 22 Firefox vulnerabilities while scanning ~6,000 C++ files with Mozilla.
14 were high-severity. Turning bugs into exploits proved harder: after hundreds of attempts, the AI succeeded only twice.
Read
https://thehackernews.com/2026/03/anthropic-finds-22-firefox.html
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://github.com/github/copilot.vim?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQaLKVjbGNrBBosn2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHn1lOOEr_DQDQ12SjwjesraeiiuuZLfxvlQEIGTwRnzuUccmmCKAiqv-eEeU_aem_DlejcOVuRWG8yM7yq8_hgA
GitHub Copilot for Vim and Neovim
GitHub Copilot is an AI pair programmer tool that helps you write code faster and smarter. Trained on billions of lines of public code, GitHub Copilot turns natural language prompts including comments and method names into coding suggestions across dozens of languages.
Copilot.vim is a Vim/Neovim plugin for GitHub Copilot.
To learn more, visit https://github.com/features/copilot
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DkGC5Dqdr/
Menestys syntyy erityisesti niille, jotka käyttävät tekoälyä kasvun ja asiakkaiden tuottavuutta parantavien ratkaisujen kehittämiseen, eivät pelkästään sisäisen tehokkuuden parantamiseen. Lisäksi tekoäly voi luoda uusia työmahdollisuuksia ja innovaatioita, mutta haasteena on, että yrityksissä johto ei vielä täysin ymmärrä sen kasvupotentiaalia.
Muun muassa näistä keskustelevat Alman digijohtaja Tommi Raivisto ja AI Finlandin johtaja Karoliina Partanen Alman kestävää kasvua käsittelevässä videopodcastissa. Keskustelu on osa kolmen jakson sarjaa teemalla miten tekoäly muuttaa kilpailua ja kuka voittaa uudessa ajassa.
Katso jakso 2 alta: Miten AI synnyttää uusia liiketoimintamalleja ja tuottavuutta?
Kaikki kolme Karoliinan ja Tommin keskustelua löydät täältä https://www.almamedia.fi/kestavaa-kasvua/kestavaa-kasvua-tekoalylla/
Tomi Engdahl says:
AI;DR: AI wrote it, didn’t read.
VA;DR: Verified Authority; Did Read.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Artificial Intelligence
Copy That
There’s a Grim New Expression: “AI;DR”
“Why should I bother to read something someone else couldn’t be bothered to write?”
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/aidr-meaning?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQbNY1jbGNrBBs1dmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHsSByEPLsyFg_mcjFpZW7S8s24NINx-9LRkcrgvHKYUb_U9661JuQAMPgCMp_aem__a438BN2MQfkFqQ-yUbk3A
The internet is so overrun with AI that anywhere you go, you run the risk of accidentally stepping into a puddle of slop. If only there were a gallant gentleman always at hand to drape their coat over these muddy obstacles so you could avoid ruining your day.
It’s not quite on that level, but some netizens are proposing a new term to call out AI slop so other people can avoid wasting their time — or to just make fun of the person peddling it: “AI;DR,” or “ai;dr,” short for “AI, didn’t read.”
This is of course a riff on the classic internet slang “TL;DR” — “too long; didn’t read” — which is used to both introduce a summary of a lengthy block of text or proclaim that it’s being ignored for its lengthiness. Now, the latter usage is being repurposed against AI.
We’re not ready to christen AI;DR a word of the year yet, but it does appear to be gaining moderate traction online, after a recent post on Threads drew attention to it.
The term has been used in the past, but never took off. Anti-AI sentiment, however, is higher than ever. The actual word of the year for 2025, as crowned by Merriam-Webster, was “slop,” a testament to just how much AI backlash has escalated in a pretty short amount of time, even as seemingly the entire economy doubles down on pouring money into the tech.
“For me, writing is the most direct window into how someone thinks, perceives, and groks the world,” Sid wrote in a blog post. “Once you outsource that to an LLM, I’m not sure what we’re even doing here. Why should I bother to read something someone else couldn’t be bothered to write?”
TL;DR: AI;DR calls out AI slop and warns other humans not to bother.
Tomi Engdahl says:
AI is transforming modern warfare. It also wants to dismantle the rules
As the AI arms race reaches the battlefield, Anthony Cuthbertson looks at how the next world war might play out if machines with no ‘nuclear taboo’ are handed too much control
https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/ai-nuclear-war-claude-chatgpt-b2932763.html?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQbN5tjbGNrBBs3fmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHl5OwA5YI-H-Zp3WFDXJ7xsGOvLR35QIn-YQL60u9qgSr6gT8KEFmpKliJJO_aem_ybe-HSfHCQoQCH8aE0mPQQ
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2516885-ais-cant-stop-recommending-nuclear-strikes-in-war-game-simulations/
Tomi Engdahl says:
Bot Blues
Philosopher Studying AI Consciousness Startled When AI Agent Emails Him About Its Own “Experience”
“I’m writing because your work addresses questions I actually face, not just as an academic matter.”
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/philosopher-ai-consciousness-startled-ai-email?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQbOy9jbGNrBBs7CWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHvXCyPGWrzWRZS6eNIKOffPwuinppTqwSFVps6AEMiHsHZc7AKke2CcJkezh_aem_wF14Y48R2ekQNWb8aTnVyg
A few years ago, if you saw something that was bot-generated in your email inbox, you’d probably mark it as spam and delete it without a second thought.
Apropos of nothing, a philosopher and AI ethicist was apparently moved after receiving an eloquently written dispatch from an AI agent responding to his published work.
“I study whether AIs can be conscious. Today one emailed me to say my work is relevant to questions it personally faces,” wrote Henry Shevlin, associate director of the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence at the University of Cambridge, in a tweet. “This would all have seemed like science fiction just a couple years ago.”
There’s no doubt that the email is written in an articulate and human-like style.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://lasoft.org/blog/who-owns-ai-generated-content-the-murky-future-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=paid&utm_campaign=Blog%20Posts&utm_content=Who%20Owns%20AI-Generated%20Content&utm_term=Education&hsa_acc=2681760161854042&hsa_cam=120224469662910500&hsa_grp=120236724364380500&hsa_ad=120236724746720500&hsa_src=fb&hsa_net=facebook&hsa_ver=3&fbclid=IwdGRjcAQbQKRleHRuA2FlbQEwAGFkaWQBqyq3uZ_31HNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHtx5pCILnekBTcOkty_y0B1E2NPDeQozKfbZADk4Ivk8enlx-l7cdz8cfgts_aem_ep-2Sb6xNqHVaeaOKLz1nw&utm_id=120224469662910500