New USB Type-C Connector

USB Type-C Connector is on the news today as they have introduced another new type of USB connector that is not directly compatible with any existing connectors. USB Type-C Connector Specifications Finalized article tells that today the USB-IF (USB Implementers Forum) announced that the latest USB connector which we first caught a glimpse of in April has been finalized. This Type-C specification tries to correct many of the issues with previous USB as a connector models. There are a lot of changes coming, with some excellent enhancements. Check USB Type-C Connector Specifications Finalized and Reversible USB Type-C connector finalized: Devices, cables, and adapters coming soon articles for details. The new connector is for example has reversible plug orientation, similar size to micro-USB, ertified for USB 3.1 data rates (10 Gbps) and support higher power charging.

With this new design, existing devices won’t be able to mate using the new cables, so there are specifications for adapter cables. There will be some time until this new connector becomes widely used. One issue on mobile devices might be the the fact that China, the EU, and the GSMA have all agreed that new mobile devices use Micro-USB for charging  (solution could maybe be including a Micro-USB-to-Type-C adapter with every new smartphone).

 

 

137 Comments

  1. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Ensuring Content Protection over USB Type-C
    https://www.synopsys.com/designware-ip/technical-bulletin/content-protection-dwtb-q217.html?elq_mid=8940&elq_cid=546544

    High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 2.2 is a security specification for protecting delivery, recording and subsequent unauthorized copying or distribution of premium audio/video content. As we move into the era of transmitting and providing high resolution content like 4K Ultra-High Definition (UHD), High Dynamic Range (HDR) and 8K UHD, robust security becomes even more important for the protection of premium content. HDCP 2.2 is widely used today by HDMI connections, less often for DisplayPort connections, and very seldom with legacy USB connections. However, as USB Type-CTM connections are getting designed into devices from phones to televisions, keeping premium content secure as it travels through this interface is critical. This article describes the challenges system-on-chip (SoC) developers face in providing a secure solution to deliver UHD content over USB Type-C and the path to finding the right solution.

    Securing Content

    To deliver UHD content, content providers require higher security to be in place. Organizations like MovieLabs, founded by Hollywood studios Disney, Paramount, Twentieth Century Fox, Sony Pictures, Universal and Warner Bros provide specific guidelines on how to protect the content as it is moved from the source to the end displays. The MovieLabs Enhanced Content Protection specification requires that devices such as tablets, smartphones, UHD TVs and other media devices, which receive high value content, implement strict security measures to ensure that content cannot be copied or freely redistributed from those devices. Among other items, the MovieLabs specification requires:

    Protection of content sent to a remote display using High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 2.2 link protection (Figure 1)
    A hardware root of trust to protect Digital Rights Management (DRM) and link protection keys
    A secure computation environment, hardware-enforced, for authenticating code that performs critical operations at power up and during runtime
    A protected video processing pipeline
    A random number generator compliant with NIST SP800-90C specification

    Meeting these security requirements entails significant investment in R&D and is easy to get wrong, leaving an implementation vulnerable to attacks and implementers potentially open to liability.

    For example, solutions based on a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) enabled by a single CPU with hardware separation may not be sufficient to face these attacks.

    USB is a widely used interconnect standard, and the introduction of the USB Type-C connector is making USB Type-C ubiquitous.

    As an SoC developer planning to support the latest multimedia requirements, finding a pre-integrated, well tested, and certified technology for protection against vulnerabilities is imperative. When looking for USB Type-C and HDCP 2.2 IP solutions, you should ask your supplier questions such as:

    Are all the features required by the market supported?
    How was this solution tested for interoperability?
    Is the solution certified by DCP (Digital Content Protection) licensing authority?
    Can you explain in detail how robustness criteria were met?
    What protection is provided against side channel attacks? Also against code modifications, fuzzing, glitching and fault injection? How have those been evaluated and what were the results?
    How many designs and devices in the market use this implementation?

    The right solution goes beyond just current specifications and mandates. While compliance is a challenging and necessary requirement, planning for future threats is even more arduous yet imperative to consider.

    Reply
  2. Tomi Engdahl says:

    One cable to rule them all
    http://www.electropages.com/2017/04/one-cable-to-rule-them-all/?utm_campaign=&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=article&utm_content=One+cable+to+rule+them+all

    When Apple thinks there is a better option available than current de facto connectivity standards it has never been afraid to pioneer it.

    Apple’s decision to go all-in with USB-C helped familiarise people with the standard and legitimise the latest iteration of the USB connector. From the specifications, USB Type-C, or USB-C, is advantageous to consumer device design – with faster data transfer, better power delivery options and, importantly, the ability to do both concurrently. All of this makes USB-C much more than a normal iteration of the standard. Google and others have also seen its potential and started integrating it into their products.

    The USB-C connector is similar in size to its Micro-USB predecessor. One major difference is it is completely symmetrical so it can connect both ways up, thereby removing a downside of previous USB plugs. Moreover, both ends of the USB-C cable can be the same, making them reversible (unlike earlier USB leads). This means that cabling is much easier to use.

    The USB-C also offers a substantial increase in data transfer speeds, using the USB 3.1 protocol to deliver up to 10Gbps. As a result it compares much more favorably to other high-speed data protocols, such as Thunderbolt and 10 GbE networking, than earlier USB did.

    It has another trick up its sleeve – advanced charging. Using the USB Power Delivery protocol, it can deliver 100W (more than adequate to charge a laptop, tablet or smartphone). Crucially, it can deliver this level of power while also transferring data.

    USB-C offers five power profiles to ensure devices can be charged according to their own particular requirements. These range from 5V, 2A up to 20V, 5A.

    It is difficult for any new technology to break into the mainstream. While USB-C offers huge plus points over traditional connectivity, these existing cables work, and wherever we are, usually it is easy to find one.

    Reply
  3. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Microsoft Thinks USB-C Isn’t Ready For the Mainstream
    https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/17/05/09/2117256/microsoft-thinks-usb-c-isnt-ready-for-the-mainstream

    When Microsoft unveiled the Surface Laptop last week, it left many customers and members of the press scratching their heads over its lack of a USB Type-C port. According to general manager of Surface Engineering, Pete Kyriacou, Microsoft seems to think that the technology isn’t ready for the mainstream.

    Microsoft does not want customers to deal with the various Type-C cables, underwhelming chargers, all the adapters, and the third-party Type-C docks. That is why the Surface Laptop features only one USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A port, one headphone jack, one Mini DisplayPort connector, and the Surface Connect port. Simplicity. That latter connection is how customers can “safely” expand their Surface device experience

    Microsoft expands on its stance to not to use a USB Type-C port
    https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/microsoft-talks-no-usb-type-c-usage/

    Microsoft’s continued stance against using USB Type-C ports is a good example of the confusion from the multiple uses of this technology.

    As we mentioned last week, USB Type-C has nothing to do with speed — it defines the port size and type of connector. The typical USB 3.1 port uses a large, rectangular “Type-A” interface relying on a single-sided this-side-up connector. But with the combined introduction of USB 3.1 Gen2, Thunderbolt 3, and Type-C, there is a lot of misconception that they are all one in the same.

    But that is not the case at all. Even more, there are specific cables required for the technology residing behind the Type-C port and they all generally look the same. Adding to the confusion, Type-C ports are sometimes used to charge their host devices. Customers could essentially grab the wrong Type-C charger and quickly run out of battery juice because the charger was not up for the task. Users would then turn to the device maker with their complaints, not the charger manufacturer.

    Microsoft does not want that. Microsoft does not want customers to deal with the various Type-C cables, underwhelming chargers, all the adapters, and the third-party Type-C docks. That is why the Surface Laptop features only one USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A port, one headphone jack, one Mini DisplayPort connector, and the Surface Connect port. Simplicity.

    Reply
  4. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Texas Instruments – USB Type C short-to-VBus and IEC ESD protector for CC (TPD2S300)
    http://www.electropages.com/2017/05/texas-instruments-usb-type-short-to-vbus-iec-esd-protector-cc/?utm_campaign=2017-05-11-Electropages&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=article&utm_content=Texas+Instruments+-+USB+Type+C+short-to-VBus+and+IEC+ESD+protector+for+CC

    The TPD2S300, from Texas Instruments, is a single chip USB Type-C port protection solution that provides 20V Short-to-VBUS overvoltage and IEC ESD protection for the CC1 and CC2 pins.

    Since the release of the USB Type-C connector, many products and accessories for USB Type-C have been released which do not meet the USB Type-C specification. One example of this is USB Type-C Power Delivery adaptors that start out with 20 V on the Vbus line.

    Another concern for USB Type-C is that mechanical twisting and sliding of the connector could short pins due to the close proximity they have in this small connector. This can cause 20V Vbus to be shorted to the CC pins. Also, due to the close proximity of the pins in the Type-C connector, there is a heightened concern that debris and moisture is going to cause the 20V VBUS pin to be shorted to the CC pins.

    These non-ideal equipments and mechanical events make it necessary for the CC pins to be 20V tolerant, even though they only operate at 5V or lower. The device enables the CC pins to be 20V tolerant without interfering with normal operation by providing overvoltage protection on the CC pins. The device places high voltage FETs in series on the CC lines. When a voltage above the OVP threshold is detected on these lines, the high voltage switches are opened up, isolating the rest of the system from the high voltage condition present on the connector.

    Reply
  5. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Thunderbolt 3 is coming
    http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/2017/05/26/thunderbolt-3-is-coming/

    On Wednesday, Intel announced it will integrate Thunderbolt 3 into future CPUs. More importantly, the company said it would open up the long-secret protocol to the world, royalty-free.
    A world where one USB-C connector does it all—today, and for many years to come.

    Reply
  6. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Protection From Puppies (or Wombats): A Closer Look at USB PD 3.0’s Fast Role Swap
    http://www.electronicdesign.com/power/protection-puppies-or-wombats-closer-look-usb-pd-30-s-fast-role-swap?NL=ED-003&Issue=ED-003_20170531_ED-003_927&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_1_b&utm_rid=CPG05000002750211&utm_campaign=11345&utm_medium=email&elq2=5d863a298ba64ec999bbcda96bc6bc2d

    We’ve talked quite a lot about the new USB specifications in recent articles (see here, here, and here). One feature we haven’t covered in depth is Fast Role Swap (FRS), defined in the latest USB Power Delivery specification (USB PD) version 3.0.

    Sponsored by: Texas Instruments. FRS supports USB’s vision of a flexible, low-voltage dc power-distribution system by allowing for seamless power transfer and continued system operation following an unexpected loss of power.

    Reply
  7. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Seven-port USB 3.1 Gen1 Hub ICs for USB Type C™ Connections
    https://www.eeweb.com/company-blog/microchip/seven-port-usb-3.1-gen1-hub-ics-for-usb-type-c-connections

    Microchips’ USB 58 and 59 Series of SmartHub IC is the industry’s first seven port USB 3.1 hubs for USB connections. They feature port splitting to provide even more ports for embedded and competing applications. With data rates up to 5Gbps, these SmartHub ICs integrate 2-to-1 multiplexer for reversible USB type-c connections and feature billboard support IO bridging and flex connect.

    Reply
  8. Tomi Engdahl says:

    USB power switch affords fast role swap
    http://www.edn.com/electronics-products/other/4458485/USB-power-switch-affords-fast-role-swap

    Diodes’ DPS1133 single-channel power switch meets the protection and FRS (fast role swap) timing requirements of the USB Power Delivery specification release 3.0, V1.0a. Specifically, the device protects the VBUS lines to and from USB Type-C connectors and adheres to the FRS timing criteria if there is an unexpected loss of USB power.

    The DPS1133 supports all the allowed USB-C port operational modes: downstream facing, upstream facing, and dual-role. Operating between 4.5 V and 24 V, it can either act to provision or consume power at up to 3.5 A through a USB Type-C connector, protecting against and recovering from fault conditions, such as overvoltage, overcurrent, short circuit, reverse voltage, and overtemperature—without the intervention of a system controller.

    Supplied in tubes of 100 pieces, the DPS1133 power switch costs $1 each in lots of 1000 units.

    DPS1133
    24V/3A 1-CH POWER SWITCH WITH FAST ROLE SWAP
    https://www.diodes.com/products/power-management/protected-switches/usb-switches/digital-power-switch/part/DPS1133

    Reply
  9. Tomi Engdahl says:

    “Feeding The Hungry” with USB Type-C
    http://www.electronicdesign.com/power/feeding-hungry-usb-type-c?NL=ED-003&Issue=ED-003_20170628_ED-003_917&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_1_b&utm_rid=CPG05000002750211&utm_campaign=11791&utm_medium=email&elq2=ea0efa25235b4ac6b8e75c3276151ee0

    Sponsored by: Texas Instruments. To meet the demands of power-hungry USB applications, the USB Type-C connector was configured to comply with the USB Power Delivery spec to provide 20 V at 5 A, or 100 W.

    For a given charging current, the charging time of a battery is approximately proportional to its capacity. Over the last decade, smartphone manufacturers have steadily increased battery size (Fig. 2). All things being equal, a USB port will take twice as long to charge a Galaxy S8 as it will to charge an S1.

    As the power and data requirements increased for USB-connected devices, the USB specification has tried to keep pace. The data rate has gone from 480 Mb/s (USB 2.0) to 10Gb/s (USB 3.1). The table shows the increase in maximum power for successive USB revisions.

    USB 3.1 can supply up to 4.5 W using the familiar Type-A and Type-B connectors, but the USB Type-C connector allows up to 15 W. All three types (A,B, and C) supply 5-V power, but add USB Power Delivery (USB PD) compliance to the Type-C connector and the port can deliver up to 5 A at 20 V, or 100 W.

    This makes it ideal for meeting the needs of a new generation of power-hungry applications that rely on USB power. “Feeding the Hungry,” if you will.

    When it comes to data and power flow in a USB Type-C/USB PD system, we no longer have fixed assignments—both the host and device can change roles, and so can the direction of power transfer.

    Reply
  10. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Linux support for USB-C is getting better

    Linus Torvalds has released kernel version 4.12. According to Torvalds, the version does not contain any sham, but a big step forward is the better native support for the new USB-C interface.

    One of the most important additions to the core is the TCPM driver, the C-type USB port driver. Its mission is to manage various USBC ports on the device.

    Source: http://www.etn.fi/index.php/13-news/6546-linuxin-tuki-usb-c-lle-paranee

    Reply
  11. Tomi Engdahl says:

    The headphone jack also disappears from Android phones

    Many probably remember the devastation Apple caused by leaving the old 3.5-millimeter audio connection completely out of the previous iPhone. No worries. Android Camp will follow up next.

    Lenovo’s Moto Z and HTC’s pair of new models were all introduced with a C-type USB connector only. And although many may even swear the old headphones become turbulent, eventually switching to USB-C is going to be the best of everyone.

    However, Android audio support is not the same as Apple’s USB Audio implementation. In many analyzes, it has been found that an extra delay of about 10 milliseconds over Android will be heard via USB.

    This delay can be very damaging to the functionality of the application. For example, in virtual reality, the audio must be real-time. Digital helpers also suffer from a delay that a person feels disturbing.

    The problem with Android is also the fragmentation of the platform. Even if the newest Android audio is better implemented, its “streaming” to the devices of the manufacturers still takes too much time.

    If you use bluetooth speakers, the problem is smaller. As long as the manufacturer of bluetooth headphones drives their latest version of the standard and no old 2.x variant.

    Source: http://www.etn.fi/index.php/13-news/6545-kuulokeliitin-katoaa-myos-androidista

    Reply
  12. Tomi Engdahl says:

    PD Buddy Sink
    Smart power jack for USB Power Delivery
    https://hackaday.io/project/20424-pd-buddy-sink

    USB Power Delivery is a cool standard for getting lots of power—up to 100 W—from a USB Type-C port. Being an open standard for supplying enough power to charge phones, laptops, and just about anything else under the sun, USB PD is poised to greatly reduce the amount of e-waste produced worldwide from obsolete proprietary chargers. Unfortunately, like all USB standards, it’s quite complex, putting it out of reach of the average electronics hobbyist.

    PD Buddy Sink solves this problem, letting any hacker or maker use USB PD in their projects. Think of it as a smart power jack. To use it, first configure a voltage and current via the USB configuration interface. Then whenever the Sink is plugged in to a USB PD power supply, it negotiates the power your project needs and provides it on the output connector.

    I searched the web, and to my surprise, no such device was available! I realized that I would have to create it myself

    PD Buddy Sink is a smart power jack for USB Power Delivery. Configure it with the voltage and current your project needs, then plug it into any USB PD power supply with a high enough power capability. It negotiates with the power supply and turns on its output, giving your project up to 3 A at 5, 9, or 15 V, and up to 5 A at 20 V.

    Reply
  13. Tomi Engdahl says:

    USB controllers are internally protected
    http://www.edn.com/electronics-products/other/4458595/USB-controllers-are-internally-protected

    STMicroelectronics’ STUSB4710 and STUSB1602 USB Type-C port controllers provide overvoltage protection of up to 22 V for the CC (configuration channel) pins and up to 28 V for the VBUS pins. Manufactured using an analog CMOS process, the devices also include on-chip discharge circuitry for the VBUS and VCONN power lines, allowing cables to be disconnected safely.

    The STUSB4710 is dedicated to controlling downstream-facing ports, while the STUSB1602 can be used for downstream-facing, upstream-facing, or dual-role control. Both ICs support Type-C cable-attachment and connector-orientation detection and operate over a supply range of 3 V to 22 V with no external voltage regulator.

    Reply
  14. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Juli Clover / MacRumors:
    USB 3.2 specification announced, which promises double data transfer speeds, or up to 20Gbps, over existing Type-C ports and cables

    Upcoming USB 3.2 Specification Will Double Data Rates Using Existing Cables
    https://www.macrumors.com/2017/07/25/usb-3-2-specification-double-data-rates/

    The USB 3.0 Promoter Group, comprising Apple, HP, Intel, Microsoft, and other companies, today introduced an upcoming USB 3.2 specification, which will eventually replace the existing USB 3.1 specification upon release.

    An incremental update, USB 3.2 is designed to define multi-lane operation for USB 3.2 hosts and devices. USB Type-C cables already support multi-lane operation, and with USB 3.2, hosts and devices can be created as multi-lane solutions, allowing for either two lanes of 5Gb/s or two lanes of 10Gb/s operation.

    USB 3.0 Promoter Group Announces USB 3.2 Update
    Specification defines doubling bandwidth to extend existing USB Type-C™ cable performance
    http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170725005509/en

    While USB hosts and devices were originally designed as single-lane solutions, USB Type-C™ cables were designed to support multi-lane operation to ensure a path for scalable performance. New USB 3.2 hosts and devices can now be designed as multi-lane solutions, allowing for up to two lanes of 5 Gbps or two lanes of 10 Gbps operation. This enables platform developers to continue advancing USB products to fit their customers’ needs by effectively doubling the performance across existing cables. For example, a USB 3.2 host connected to a USB 3.2 storage device will now be capable of realizing over 2 GB/sec data transfer performance over an existing USB Type-C™ cable that is certified for SuperSpeed USB 10 Gbps.

    “When we introduced USB Type-C to the market, we intended to assure that USB Type-C cables and connectors certified for SuperSpeed USB or SuperSpeed USB 10 Gbps would, as produced, support higher performance USB as newer generations of USB 3.0 were developed,” said Brad Saunders, USB 3.0 Promoter Group Chairman. “The USB 3.2 update delivers the next level of performance.”

    Key characteristics of the USB 3.2 solution include:

    Two-lane operation using existing USB Type-C™ cables
    Continued use of existing SuperSpeed USB physical layer data rates and encoding techniques
    Minor update to hub specification to address increased performance and assure seamless transitions between single and two-lane operation

    For users to obtain the full benefit of this performance increase, a new USB 3.2 host must be used with a new USB 3.2 device and the appropriate certified USB Type-C™ cable. This update is part of the USB performance roadmap and is specifically targeted to developers at this time. Branding and marketing guidelines will be established after the final specification is published. The USB 3.2 specification is now in a final draft review phase with a planned formal release in time for the USB Developer Days North America event in September 2017.

    Reply
  15. Tomi Engdahl says:

    The USB 3.2 update is on the horizon. The incremental update defines multi-lane operation for new USB 3.2 hosts and devices, allowing for up to two lanes of 5 Gbps or two lanes of 10 Gbps operation. Existing USB Type-C cables designed to support multi-lane operation (certified for SuperSpeed USB 10 Gbps) will see effectively doubled performance. The specification is in draft release, with a formal release by September’s USB Developer Days.

    Source: https://semiengineering.com/the-week-in-review-design-90/
    More: http://www.usb.org/press/USB_3.2_PR_USB-IF_Final.pdf

    Reply
  16. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Don’t Leave Home Without It: Redrivers for USB Type-C Designs
    Sponsored by: Texas Instruments. To overcome signal-integrity issues that crop up in circuits incorporating USB Type-C, USB 3.1, and Alternate Mode, designers should consider adding a redriver.
    http://www.electronicdesign.com/power/don-t-leave-home-without-it-redrivers-usb-type-c-designs?NL=ED-003&Issue=ED-003_20170731_ED-003_546&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_1_b&utm_rid=CPG05000002750211&utm_campaign=12274&utm_medium=email&elq2=673f0e6c7ecd4dbd9528b01e1872f76c

    Reply
  17. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Don’t Leave Home Without It: Redrivers for USB Type-C Designs
    http://www.electronicdesign.com/power/don-t-leave-home-without-it-redrivers-usb-type-c-designs?NL=ED-003&Issue=ED-003_20170731_ED-003_546&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_1_b&utm_rid=CPG05000002750211&utm_campaign=12274&utm_medium=email&elq2=673f0e6c7ecd4dbd9528b01e1872f76chttp://www.electronicdesign.com/power/don-t-leave-home-without-it-redrivers-usb-type-c-designs?NL=ED-003&Issue=ED-003_20170731_ED-003_546&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_1_b&utm_rid=CPG05000002750211&utm_campaign=12274&utm_medium=email&elq2=673f0e6c7ecd4dbd9528b01e1872f76c

    Sponsored by: Texas Instruments. To overcome signal-integrity issues that crop up in circuits incorporating USB Type-C, USB 3.1, and Alternate Mode, designers should consider adding a redriver.

    In 2017, the USB Type-C set of specifications rules the roost. The complete set comprises the USB Type-C connector specification: the USB 3.1 interface specification with a maximum data rate of 10 Gb/s; and the USB Power Delivery specification (USB PD) for power-related functions. Although they’re often mentioned in same breath, a USB system can support one specification but not the others—USB Type-C but not USB 3.1 or USB PD, for example.

    What are some contributors to loss of signal integrity? Figure 1 tells the tale.

    Insertion loss is the loss of signal power resulting from any device added in the signal path between transmitter and receiver. In this context, a “device” can be a component, a connector, a cable, or even a PCB trace. The loss increases with the number of added devices or the length of the trace or cable.
    Crosstalk occurs when a signal propagating in one channel creates an undesired effect by coupling into another channel. The coupling mechanism can be capacitive, inductive, or conductive.
    Inter-symbol interference (ISI) is a form of signal distortion in which one symbol interferes with subsequent symbols. This is an unwanted phenomenon that makes the communication less reliable, since the current symbol sees the previous symbols as noise. The interval between symbols becomes smaller with increasing transmission speed, so a high-speed channel is more prone to ISI.
    Signal reflections occur when a signal encounters a change in impedance as it propagates from source to receiver. A portion of the signal power is reflected back to the transmitter while the rest continues in the original direction. Many elements may cause an impedance change, including connectors, in-line components, PCB vias, or a change in trace width.
    Jitter is any deviation from the true periodicity of a digital signal. The deviation can be in terms of amplitude, phase timing, or the width of the signal pulse. Among the causes of jitter are EMI and crosstalk with other signals. Jitter can create flicker in a display, extraneous noise or clicks in an audio signal, or affect the ability of a processor in a desktop or server to perform as intended.
    Noise is the portion of the signal that doesn’t carry useful information. A signal must maintain a minimum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in order to be decoded properly by the receiver.

    Any of these factors will cause high-speed signals to suffer signal degradation.

    Use Equalization to Compensate for Signal-Integrity Problems

    The Linear Redriver, USB 3.1, and USB Type-C

    Texas Instruments offers a range of redrivers for different applications. The TUSB522, for example, is a dual-channel, single-lane USB 3.1 redriver that supports 5-Gb/s (Gen 1) operation. The device incorporates receiver equalization with multiple gain settings, and selectable transmitter de-emphasis and output swing control to compensate for downstream losses.

    The TUSB522 also features an intelligent low-frequency periodic-signaling (LFPS) controller. LFPS is a communication sideband sent on the normal USB 3.0/3.1 data lines, but at a lower frequency of 10-50 MHz instead of the usual 5/10 Gb/s. This sideband signals initialization and low-power management information when the bus is in the idle state (no signaling occurring). The controller senses the low-frequency LFPS signals and automatically disables the de-emphasis function. This is required for full USB 3.1 compliance.

    Although redrivers such as the TUSB522 have all of the features needed for a USB 3.1 system with a Type-A or Type-B connector, the USB Type-C connector requires additional switching circuitry to accommodate connector flipping (Fig. 4).

    Reply
  18. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Programmable USB Type-C switch introduced by Acroname
    http://www.vision-systems.com/articles/2017/08/programmable-usb-type-c-switch-introduced-by-acroname.html

    Featuring four USB Type-C ports, the programmable USB-C switch from Acroname is optimized for applications in manufacturing and development environments. The USB-C Switch enables users to to programmatically select one of the four USB ports to conduct hot-plug and un-plug operations, enable and disable individual ports, monitor current and voltage and automate connector orientation flip operations, while advanced USB Type-C features—including USB Power Delivery (USB-PD), Alternate Modes such as DisplayPort and HDMI—are supported. Additionally, the switch is directional, allowing it to be used in 1:4 or 4:1 configurations, and APIs in C, C++, Python and LabVIEW control the switch and a cross-platform GUI application is provided.

    Reply
  19. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Old display connectors disappear

    At one time, monitors had more connections at the back or bottom. There was often an old VGA connection, a DVI connection, a DisplayPort connection, and several HDMI connections. Samsung now shows the model with its new professional display. They have only one type of connectivity, type C USB.

    Specifically, the USBC is not the only interface of Samsung’s newmonitor monitors. They also feature a DP linking interface that allows multiple display DisplayPort signals to be chained to different screens.

    However, physically different connectors will disappear because the USB-C can support different protocols.

    Source: http://etn.fi/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6744&via=n&datum=2017-08-29_15:18:07&mottagare=31202

    Reply
  20. Tomi Engdahl says:

    A primer on USB Type-C and Power Delivery applications and requirements
    http://www.ti.com/lit/wp/slyy109/slyy109.pdf

    This introduction to USB Type-C™ and Power
    Delivery dives deep into various applications
    and their data and power requirements.

    Reply
  21. Tomi Engdahl says:

    The USB bus is now twice as fast

    The USBIF organization, the Universal Serial Bus Implementers Forum, has released the final version of the USB standard 3.2 specification. Four years have passed since the previous standard, ie 3.1 Superspeed.

    With the 3.2 standard, the speed of the bus increases from the current 10 gigabytes per second to double that of 20 gigabits per second. The bus upgrade is underpinned by the higher number of conductors of the new C-type connector.

    With the 3.2 standard, data is obtained via a C-type USB connection to run at 20 gigabits per second, or 2.5 gigabytes per second. The pace is twice as old as the 3.1 standard, but half of the Thunderbolt 3.0 speed.

    Equipment manufacturers have not yet been able to publish 3.2-standard equipment

    Source: http://www.etn.fi/index.php/13-news/6927-usb-vaeylae-on-nyt-kaksi-kertaa-nopeampi

    Reply
  22. Tomi Engdahl says:

    USB Type-C Alternate Mode: The One for All
    https://blogs.synopsys.com/vip-central/2017/09/26/usb-type-c-alternate-mode-the-one-for-all/

    Type-C connector being used with third party peripherals in-addition to USB. The mode in which the Type-C cable assembly facilitates operation of “Alternate” protocols is called Alternate Mode. USB Type-C Alternate Mode specification allows MHL, DisplayPort, HDMI, and Thunderbolt over Type-C. Alternate Mode is an option made available to the USB Hosts; however, USB should be the preeminent interface to be exposed over Type-C assembly, justifying the tag ‘Alternate’.

    Available Pins

    Alternate Mode achieves the purpose by reconfiguring groups of available pins. It should be noted that all the pins are not available for reconfiguration during Alternate Mode. The pins A2, A3, B10, B11 and B2, B3, A10, A11 represent two pairs of differential signals available for USB Gen A and Gen B operation. During Alternate Mode, these pins are used for third party protocol traffic.

    In addition, a pair of side buffer pins (A8, A9) are also available, however these pins are of no significance to USB. For example, per VESA Alt Mode specification for DisplayPort, differential pairs represent Main Link (Lane1-4) and side buffers are used to connect the Auxiliary channel.

    How to Enter ‘Alternate Mode’

    Downstream Facing Port (DFP) and Upstream Facing Ports (UFP) use Power Delivery’s Structured Vendor Defined Messages (VDMs) to discover, configure, enter or exit “Alternate” Modes. The Power Delivery traffic on CC pin, in the form of VDMs, could identify the alternate standards using 32-bit SVIDs (Standard or Vendor ID). SVIDs are allocated by the USB Implementers Forum and each SVID represents a unique protocol. A standard flow must be followed to recognize the Alternate Modes, so a UFP can support them. The minimum criteria before exchanging VDM messages with UFP is that the power contract between DFP and UFP should have been established.

    DFP can request mode entry/exit. UFP will respond with an ACK or NAK depending on if it accepts or rejects the mode entry/exit. Once ‘Enter Mode’ message exchange is complete, the Pins available for reconfiguration are assigned to the peripheral for which the mode entry was requested.

    Type-C with Alternate Mode, a connector which is light and diminutively “form factored”, provides convenience to High Definition audio video consumers. With USB literally being universal and USB 3.2 on the horizon with an expected 20Gbps data transfer at its disposal,

    Reply
  23. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Microchip USB4715 FlexConnect Operation
    Posted Oct 05, 2017 at 8:30 am
    https://www.eeweb.com/company-blog/microchip/microchip-usb4715-flexconnect-operation

    Introduction

    The Microchip USB4715 smart hub allows any of the 4 FlexConnect capable USB ports to assume the role of USB host at any time during hub operation. This host role exchange feature is called FlexConnect.

    his functionality can be used in two primary ways:

    Host Swapping: This functionality can be achieved through a hub wherein a host and device can agree to swap the host/device relationship; The host becomes a device, and the device becomes a host.

    In a host swapping application, the role of host is exchanged between two dual-role capable devices. This host mode switching can be initiated through ID pin control, protocol handshake, or some other proprietary method.

    Host Sharing: A USB ecosystem can be shared between multiple hosts. Note that only 1 host may access to the USB tree at a time.

    In a host sharing application, multiple hosts are connected to the hub; only one of these hosts has access to the USB device tree at a time. All other hosts are effectively ‘disconnected’ from the USB tree when they do not control the host port.

    FlexConnect can be enabled through any of the following three methods:

    SMBus Control: An embedded SMBus master can control the state of the FlexConnect feature through basic write/read operations.
    USB Command: FlexConnect can be initiated via a special USB command directed to the hub’s internal Hub Feature Controller device.
    Direct Pin Control: Any available GPIO pin on the hub can be assigned the role of a FlexConnect control pin.

    Reply
  24. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Hackaday Prize Entry: Playing With USB Power Delivery
    https://hackaday.com/2017/10/17/hackaday-prize-entry-playing-with-usb-power-delivery/

    USB Power Delivery is the technology that’s able to pump 100 Watts down a USB cable. It’s been around for half a decade now, but only in the last few years have devices and power supplies supporting USB PD shown up on the market. This is a really interesting technology, and we can’t wait to see the outcome of people messing around with five amps flowing through a cable they picked up at the dollar store, but where are the DIY solutions to futz around with USB PD?

    For his Hackaday Prize entry, [Clayton] is doing just that. He’s built a tiny little power jack for USB PD that has a USB type-C plug on one end and a pair of screw terminals on the other. It’s the USB PD Buddy Sink, and once we find some cheap 100 Watt USB power adapters, this is going to be an invaluable tool.

    PD Buddy Sink
    Smart power jack for USB Power Delivery
    https://hackaday.io/project/20424-pd-buddy-sink

    Reply
  25. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Controller automates Type-C validation
    https://www.edn.com/electronics-products/other/4458927/Controller-automates-Type-C-validation?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=edn&utm_campaign=products-tools

    The N7018A test controller from Keysight enables automated validation of USB 3.1, Thunderbolt 3, and DisplayPort devices over a USB Type-C interface. A key component of Keysights’ high-speed validation systems, the N7018A provides full control of the USB Type-C interface and can set power contracts up to 100 W (consuming or providing). It can also put devices into alternate mode for DisplayPort or Thunderbolt testing.

    By using LFPS (low-frequency periodic signaling) for the control of USB 3.1 devices and routing SBU (sideband use) lines to industry-standard controllers for alternate-mode testing, the N7018A provides complete test device control. LBPM (LFPS based pulse width modulation) signaling is supported to ensure a device is able to negotiate up to USB 3.1 Gen 2, while access to key signals, such as VBUS, SBU, and CC (configuration channel) lines, allows power up/debug, interface protocol monitoring, and power delivery testing.

    http://www.keysight.com/en/pd-2856943-pn-N7018A/type-c-test-controller?nid=-54649.4998518.00&cc=US&lc=eng

    Reply
  26. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Controller automates Type-C validation
    https://www.edn.com/electronics-products/other/4458927/Controller-automates-Type-C-validation

    The N7018A test controller from Keysight enables automated validation of USB 3.1, Thunderbolt 3, and DisplayPort devices over a USB Type-C interface. A key component of Keysights’ high-speed validation systems, the N7018A provides full control of the USB Type-C interface and can set power contracts up to 100 W (consuming or providing). It can also put devices into alternate mode for DisplayPort or Thunderbolt testing.

    By using LFPS (low-frequency periodic signaling) for the control of USB 3.1 devices and routing SBU (sideband use) lines to industry-standard controllers for alternate-mode testing, the N7018A provides complete test device control. LBPM (LFPS based pulse width modulation) signaling is supported to ensure a device is able to negotiate up to USB 3.1 Gen 2, while access to key signals, such as VBUS, SBU, and CC (configuration channel) lines, allows power up/debug, interface protocol monitoring, and power delivery testing.

    Reply
  27. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Rechargeable Li-ion Packs Focus of USB Type-C Reference Design
    http://www.electronicdesign.com/power/rechargeable-li-ion-packs-focus-usb-type-c-reference-design?NL=ED-003&Issue=ED-003_20171030_ED-003_690&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_1_b&utm_rid=CPG05000002750211&utm_campaign=13783&utm_medium=email&elq2=087f2f9484b44cc19c060bac6345c9de

    We’re seeing more portable devices turning to USB Type-C, as evidenced recently with the Huawei Mate 9 and the LG G5 phones. More designers also realize that as Type-C evolves, it brings with it a wider array of advantages. For example, they can now create dual-role port (DRP) applications with USB Type-C power delivery (PD).

    In another advance, Silicon Labs has developed a reference design that helps designers simplify the production of USB Type-C rechargeable lithium-ion battery packs

    With Silicon Labs’ new single-chip solution, designers can develop customized USB Type-C rechargeable lithium-ion battery packs for dual-role port applications.

    Reply
  28. Tomi Engdahl says:

    USB 3.2 Cable Lengths and Water Delivery
    https://blogs.synopsys.com/tousbornottousb/2017/12/06/usb-3-2-cable-lengths-and-water-delivery/

    From USB 2.0 to USB 3.2, USB cables became shorter.

    When USB replaced keyboards and mice, USB’s signaling rates of 1.5 Mbps and 12 Mbps. Transmitted more than enough data. If you know what a floppy disk is, those stored data in the Megabytes.

    When USB 2.0 launched in 1999 it maintained the 5 meter cable length.

    With USB 3.0 the cable length dropped to about 2-3 meters for 5 Gbps.

    And with USB 3.1 it dropped to 1 meter for 10 Gbps.

    USB 3.2 cables can be 1 meter because it uses 2 lanes of 10 Gbps.

    The PHY / electrical signaling for USB 3.1/3.2 is exactly the same so cables can stay the same length.

    The specifications don’t actually specific cable length. They specify the amount of signal loss through a “cable” that is allowable. Signal loss is measured in decibels or dB.

    For USB 3.1/USB 3.2 the loss budget (allowable signal loss) 23 dB. This means the budget loss is 8.5 dB for the host, 6 dB for the cable assembly, and 8.5 for the device (peripheral) must be less than the total 23 dB.

    The USB-IF tests for logo certification of cables specifically to see if they are within the allowable loss. In this case the copper inside needs to have a wire gauge of 20-28 AWG for power and ground. For signals the wire can be a little thinner from 26-34 AWG. See the table for details.

    As long as the cable builds to the “The USB 3.1 Legacy Connector and Cable Specification” specification the supported cable length for 10 Gbps or 20 Gbps is 1m. This is in the 10 Gbps signaling mode.

    Reply
  29. Tomi Engdahl says:

    USBC is becoming more common quickly

    The C-type C-type connector was introduced as standard in August 2014. Thereafter, the connector has become more commonplace than any other earlier interface. In the next few years, their market share will continue to grow at 70%. According to IHS, last year, there were 300 million devices using a USBC connection. Of these, a big part was smartphones, but the interface was also widespread on laptops.

    With growth, the USBC becomes the most common PC and peripheral interface. Sure, it will take some time. In 2021, the C-type USB connector has almost five billion units, IHS estimates.

    The absolute advantage of the USBC connector is that it supports not only USB 3.1′s high-speed data transfer but also power transfer with up to 100 watts. In addition, various audio and video signals can be transferred via the connector through the alt-mode function. Before long, the USBC will probably also replace, for example, HDMI terminals.

    The USBC is a two-sided 24-pin connector that can be set anywhere. The connector is 8.4 x 2.6 millimeters, making it a de facto standard for smart phones.

    Source: http://www.etn.fi/index.php/13-news/7319-usbc-yleistyy-nopeasti

    Reply
  30. Tomi Engdahl says:

    The Week In Review: Design
    https://semiengineering.com/the-week-in-review-design-111/

    The MIPI Alliance updated its Narrow Interface for Debug and Test specification. MIPI NIDnT v1.2 enables using USB Type-C v1.2 “alternate modes” to facilitate debug and test over USB Type-C pins. According to Enrico Carrieri, chair of the MIPI Debug Working Group, “Developers do not need to be experts on USB Type-C to use the specification. Those who are familiar with MIPI NIDnT will find that the debug and test concepts haven’t changed. The specification simply adds capability to use USB Type-C.”

    Also released was the MIPI Discovery and Configuration Specification for Narrow Interface for Debug and Test v1.0 (MIPI DisCo for NIDnT v1.0), a standardized software tool for test device software to discover and configure the hardware debug and test capabilities enabled by MIPI NIDnT.

    MIPI Alliance Enhances its MIPI NIDnT Debug and Test Specification to Enable Debugging over the Latest USB Type-C Connectors
    https://mipi.org/node/1338

    A key feature of the new MIPI NIDnT release is its innovative use of USB Type-C v1.2 “alternate modes” to facilitate debug and test over USB Type-C pins. Expected users of the MIPI NIDnT specification include companies that want to offer generic testing tools for system-on-chip (SOC) manufacturers, board developers or original equipment manufacturers, as well as those that want to build debug and testing tools for their own internal processes.

    MIPI NIDnT v1.2 provides benefits during the system design process, when space is usually not available on a board for a dedicated debug connector. The specification also adds value after products are on the market, particularly when testing requires access to components that are enclosed within a sealed device. MIPI NIDnT alleviates both of these challenges by reusing existing functional connectors, such as USB Type-C ports, on a device.

    “Debugging has always been a critical part of mobile device development, but it has become increasingly difficult as the market has evolved to more complex, compact designs,”

    Reply
  31. Tomi Engdahl says:

    USB Type-C Power Delivery and Wireless Charging Now Available in One IC
    http://www.electronicdesign.com/power/usb-type-c-power-delivery-and-wireless-charging-now-available-one-ic?NL=ED-003&Issue=ED-003_20180112_ED-003_225&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_1_b&utm_rid=CPG05000002750211&utm_campaign=14905&utm_medium=email&elq2=b2dfafb6a32140809d4e9659a837f2da

    They’ve arrived. ROHM’s dual-mode devices enable simultaneous charging, automatically switching charging operation without the need for an MCU.

    While wireless charging continues to gain traction, a growing number of portable devices also are adopting the USB Type-C Power Delivery (USBPD) standard, which allows for charging up to 100 W (20 V/5 A). To deliver the wide power-supply range required by USBPD, a boost function must be added to a system to charge two-cell (approx. 8.4 V) batteries from conventional 5-V chargers. And if you want to enable the two different charging methods at the same time, it requires mounting charge ICs along with peripheral components as well as an MCU to control charge switching—all of which presents a barrier to introduction.

    However, ROHM shows it can be done in a simpler manner. The company developed dual-input charging ICs supporting both USBPD and 5-V inputs in a single package that’s compatible with wireless as well as USBPD charging technologies. Support also is provided for USB Battery Charging Specification Revision 1.2 (USB BC 1.2), the key standard for establishing the proper way to charge a battery from a USB port (up to 7.5 W [5 V/1.5 A]). This facilitates configuration of dual-mode systems capable of simultaneous charging via USBPD or from an ac adapter.

    The BD99954GW/MUV (Fig. 1) generates a charging voltage from 2.56 to 19.2 V for one to four cells (in series) through boost-buck control.

    Reply
  32. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Synopsys’ Eric Huang looks back at why the USB On-The-Go specification was revolutionary in getting devices talking to each other and how the shift to USB Type-C and Dual Mode means it isn’t needed anymore.

    USB Dual Role replaces USB On-The-Go
    https://blogs.synopsys.com/tousbornottousb/2018/05/03/usb-dual-role-replaces-usb-on-the-go/

    USB Dual Role replaces USB On-The-Go

    As product makers move from USB 3.0 to USB 3.1 (and soon USB 3.2), they also move to USB Type-C. With Type-C, this means the connector is the same on all products. PCs and phones. Media players (remember those) and cameras and flash drives.

    So no more A, micro-B, or micro-AB connectors. Only Type-C

    Consumers can buy just one cable, and use it for everything. No more mixes of different cables.

    Phones can be dual role devices (DRD). A DRD can be either a host or a device.

    A phone is a device (connected to a PC) or a host (connected to a printer).

    The USB On-The-Go standard defined that.

    What happens when you connect one phone (DRD) to another phone (another DRD)?

    OTG defined this.

    The bottom line: OTG defined specific way to have a USB product switch between host and device. It isn’t needed anymore for USB 3.1 going forward. Dual Role, role switching is done automatically via context switching.

    Reply
  33. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Robert Triggs / Android Authority:
    USB Type-C has become a mess of compatibility issues, conflicting proprietary standards, and lacks sufficient consumer information to guide purchasing decisions

    It’s 2018 and USB Type-C is still a mess
    https://www.androidauthority.com/state-of-usb-type-c-870996/

    USB Type-C was billed as the solution for all our future cable needs, unifying power and data delivery with display and audio connectivity, and ushering in an age of the one-size-fits-all cable. Unfortunately for those already invested in the USB Type-C ecosystem, which is anyone who has bought a flagship phone in the past couple of years, the standard has probably failed to live up to the promises.

    Even the seemingly most basic function of USB Type-C — powering devices — has become a mess of compatibility issues, conflicting proprietary standards, and a general lack of consumer information to guide purchasing decisions. The problem is that the features supported by different devices aren’t clear, yet the defining principle of the USB Type-C standard makes consumers think everything should just work.

    Moving phones between different chargers, even of the same current and voltage ratings, often won’t produce the same charging speeds. Furthermore, picking a third party USB Type-C cable to replace the typically too short included cable can result in losing fast charging capabilities.

    I have three different phone chargers from LG, Huawei, and Samsung. Points for guessing how many of them can fast charge a phone from a different brand. It’s a simple question with a complicated answer.

    Yes, there are cable and power adapter labels, but very few consumers check for them, even when displayed correctly. Ultimately there’s very little consistency about the type of charging available. This becomes even less clear when products start using bi-directional charging capabilities like charging your phone from your laptop’s USB port.

    Devices are just as problematic too when it comes to support for “Alternate Modes” and non-USB protocols. These include DisplayPort, MHL, HDMI, Ethernet, and audio functionality provided over the connector, all of which rely on the connected devices and cables to support them. These are not a compulsory part of the specification

    USB Type-C is compatible with lots of features, but not every port supports everything.

    Cable compatibility, arguably the most frustrating of Type-C’s problems, stems from legacy support for slower devices and the introduction of higher speed use cases like video data.

    DisplayPort, MHL, HMDI and Thunderbolt 20Gbps are supported via passive USB Type-C cables at less than two meters that carry the “trident” SuperSpeed USB logo or less than one meter for SuperSpeed+ labeled cables.Active cables will be required for further distances and you’ll have to look out for the Thunderbolt logo if you want 40Gbps speeds. Passive adapter cables to other USB types won’t support any of these modes.

    USB Type-C’s complexity is undoubtedly its undoing. Although the idea of one cable to support everything sounds very useful, the reality has quickly become a convoluted combination of proprietary versus on-spec products, differing cable qualities and capabilities, and opaque feature support. The result is a standard that looks simple to use but quickly leads to consumer frustration as there is no clear indication why certain cables and features don’t work across devices.

    At the same time, product developers are facing a similarly frustrating situation. Supporting the full range of advanced USB Type-C features is a complex engineering feat, far more so than previous USB generations.

    Product developers and the USB Implementers Forum need to get on top of this situation and push the standard in a more consumer-friendly direction.

    Reply
  34. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Saelig Introduces Teledyne LeCroy Mercury T2C/T2P USB2.0 Protocol and Power Analyzers
    https://www.eeweb.com/profile/eeweb/news/saelig-introduces-teledyne-lecroy-mercury-t2c-t2p-usb2-0-protocol-and-power-analyzers

    Saelig Company, Inc. has announced the availability of the new Teledyne LeCroy Mercury T2P and T2C USB2.0 Analyzers, low cost, robust USB Type-C Protocol Analyzers with upgraded VBUS (power) analysis and optional support for DisplayPort™ Auxiliary channel message decoding. They offer full support for USB 2.0 protocol testing and adds advanced USB Type-C analysis capabilities. There are two base models: the Mercury T2C and the new Mercury T2P, which adds the Power Tracker™ graphical analysis of VBUS and CC voltages.These pocket-sized analyzers capture and decode the widest range of USB 2.0 device classes plus Type-C link states and Power Delivery 3.0 messages. Both the Mercury T2P and T2C utilize the industry leading CATC Trace analysis software for verifying and debugging USB and PD protocol issues.

    Reply
  35. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Charging USB-C Devices Off Of LiPo Battery Packs
    https://hackaday.com/2018/07/14/charging-usb-c-devices-off-of-lipo-battery-packs/

    Delivering power over a USB-C connector is an interesting engineering challenge, and for his Hackaday Prize entry, [Chris Hamilton] is taking up the task. He’s building a USB-C battery charger, allowing him to charge standard R/C battery packs over USB.

    There are two major components of the charger. The first, a Cypress CCG2 USB Power Delivery negotiator, handles all the logic of sending a command to the USB power supply and telling it to open up the pipes. It’s an off-the-shelf part and the implementation is well documented in app notes. The second major component is the battery management circuit built on a TI BQ40z60RHB.

    Small Multicell USB Type C Charger
    USB Type C has up to 100W of charging capability, perfect for a multicell charger
    https://hackaday.io/project/85465-small-multicell-usb-type-c-charger

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*