Landmark UN Climate Change Report: Act Now To Avoid Climate Catastrophe | IFLScience

https://www.iflscience.com/environment/landmark-un-climate-change-report-act-now-to-avoid-climate-catastrophe/

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has unleashed their Special Report on the impact of global warming reaching 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.
“This IPCC report is set to outline a rescue plan for humanity,”
“1.5°C is the new 2°C,”
If we stick to Paris Climate Agreement commitments, we could still see a global warming of about 3°C by 2100.

1,356 Comments

  1. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Weeble Wobble
    Earth on Track to Become Uninhabitable, Scientists Say
    “Policymakers and the public remain largely unaware of the risks posed by what would effectively be a point-of-no-return transition.”
    https://futurism.com/science-energy/earth-uninhabitable-climate-change?fbclid=IwVERDUARhHMtleHRuA2FlbQIxMABzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAwzNTA2ODU1MzE3MjgAAR65LgytLnpzeOboZMNPY0FUoIJbxB68KMnwq1WfT64odMQLc2qjWR6-JsA-wQ_aem_g-zdpdztUNLYCm8uUVG6LQ

    Reply
  2. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Heat Death
    In Irony-Soaked Incident, Amazon Data Center Shuts Down Due to High Temperatures
    It’d be funny if it wasn’t so dark.
    https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/amazon-data-center-temperatures

    Reply
  3. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Brace Yourselves
    Last Time an El Niño Was This Bad, It Killed 50 Million People
    “It was arguably the worst environmental disaster to ever befall humanity.”
    https://futurism.com/science-energy/el-nino-killed-50-million?fbclid=IwdGRjcARy2ydjbGNrBHLa3mV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHiru0fFNVTOKAFqJYEa4tcnGCQqC7WEdFED8rdSYPuQ0dxTqxYkC6aukbWfH_aem_OK9x8OjRlhGHX8YiJBRwCA

    As if oil shortages, perpetual wars, and the existential angst of AI weren’t stressful enough, there’s an El Niño brewing — and it’s looking like it’ll be one of the most severe in over a century.

    According to numerous weather models, this year’s El Niño — a prolonged climate event featuring unusually warm temperatures, which pops up every couple of years — could easily be the most severe we’ve ever experienced in the modern age. This year’s warm spell could supercharge ocean temperatures by as much as 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, the Wall Street Journal reports, resulting in widespread droughts for some, floods for others, and perhaps most chillingly, chaos for global food supplies.

    Reply
  4. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Need a Breather
    Remember How Sucking Carbon Out of the Air Was Going to Save the Planet? We Have Terrible News
    To say we’re way behind schedule is an understatement.
    https://futurism.com/science-energy/carbon-capture-update?fbclid=IwdGRjcASSu9xjbGNrBJK7aWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHo1UnBerFLNjmwsflYbVSwLeJKxDBsxzvMAO-Wurq7GtdbYCEGs-dn6Oaa1__aem_QYZzuG5im-i7ruxZvni71A

    The idea of sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere to combat climate change might be a necessary intervention, but it always sounded like a longshot.

    Unfortunately, it seems like the strategy is already hitting a wall. A new report published this week found that ongoing carbon dioxide removal (CDR) efforts are barely putting a dent in the fight against global warming — and that for them to start making an impact, they would need to be scaled up at a rate that rivals the adoption of solar panels.

    In other words, we’re not doing it big enough, and we’re not doing it fast enough. And the longer we wait to get the ball rolling, the more carbon removal we’ll need to do to mitigate climate impacts.

    “Countries have pledged around 2.7 billion [metric tons] of carbon removal by 2035 and about 3.6 billion by 2050, but climate pathways require much more, especially in the long term,” report coauthor William Lamb, a scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, told The Guardian. “This leaves a gap that grows significantly over time.”

    Scientists generally agree that CDR efforts will play a small but necessary role in limiting global warming to within 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit — but only as a complement to the primary goal of aggressively reducing our emissions, and eventually hitting net zero emissions by 2050. The International Panel on Climate Change considers carbon removal to be “unavoidable,” or essential to achieving climate targets,

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*