komedi filmi izle


Archive for March, 2010

April Fools Pranks and Gadgets

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

April Fools Day is not too far away. It is celebrated in most parts of the world people either hate it or love it, but they just can’t ignore it. Top 100 April Fools Pranks and Gadgets gives you a lot of ideas for preparing for all the wonderful pranks and that that cool gadgets could be used for a number of practical jokes. You could play a number of hoaxes and practical jokes on almost anybody including friends, family members, enemies, and neighbors. Since the aim of the prank is to embarrass the gullible and not physically or emotionally hurt them, you might want to be sure that you do not take the jokes too far. Top 100 April Fools Pranks and Gadgets has links to many cool products and some electronics circuits that can be used for practical jokes.

april-fools-pranks-walyou

Light for Communication between Computer Chips

Monday, March 29th, 2010

New advances in optical communications are always interesting. IBM Scientists Create Ultra-Fast Device Which Uses Light for Communication between Computer Chips and IBM jumps ‘last hurdle’ to on-chip optical communication articles tell that IBM scientists few weeks ago unveiled a significant step towards replacing electrical signals that communicate via copper wires between computer chips with tiny silicon circuits that communicate using pulses of light. Their new invention is called a nanophotonic avalanche photodetector. It is the fastest of its kind and could potentially enable breakthroughs in energy-efficient computing. This 40-Gbps photodetector is seen as keystone for enabling promising technology. This photodetector is made of Germanium. “This invention brings the vision of on-chip optical interconnections much closer to reality,” said Dr. T.C. Chen, vice president, Science and Technology, IBM Research. There is also a video in YouTube about this invention.

For several years, IBM has been developing a nanophotonics toolkit for creating optical communications between chips consisting of waveguides, modulators, switches and photodetectors. Over the last few years, IBM has demonstrated silicon modulators for converting electrical signals into light, a silicon delay line for buffering optical signals plus the waveguides and switches necessary to create a complete chip-to-chip optical bus. With the addition of this nanophotonic avalanche photodetector, IBM claims to have its nanoelectronic ducks in-a-row standing poised to obsolete copper wires in favor of optical communications on and among future chips. Let’s wait to see what kind of device will use those technologies first.. and when.

There are also other players on the field. For interesting extra reading take a look at the All-optical communication comes of age article. It has information on all-optical signal processing on a silicon-based device at speeds of more than 100Gb per second.

ibm_optical

Image source: video

New server in use

Monday, March 29th, 2010

ePanorama.net is now running on a new more powerful web server. Things should be now running more smoothly. Enjoy the new speed. Report if you see any problems on the new server.

epanorama.net logo

Is H.264 a legal minefield?

Friday, March 26th, 2010

H.264 use isn’t all free all the time. MPEG-LA is the industry group that licenses the H.264 patent portfolio to the likes of software companies, optical-disc duplicators, Blu-ray player makers, and others who have need to use H.264. MPEG LA licenses a portfolio of more than 1,000 H.264-related patents on behalf of 26 companies that hold the patents.

Is H.264 a legal minefield for video pros? article tells that the licensing issues can be problematic to everyone working with video, because H.264 is very widely used. If you’re a digital-video professional, you need to understand those  a bit off-putting licensing terms. For some applications H.264 is free but for some applications you have to pay for it. For example the wedding videographer might need to pay 2 cents per disc they sell.

If the video is broadcast for free over the Internet, H.264 can be used now for free. Earlier this year, MPEG LA extended through 2015 a provision that means streaming H.264 video over the Net requires no royalty payments as long as anyone can see the video without paying.

The question is what happens after year 2015? If you think that this isn’t an issue that’s worth worrying about then study the history. HTML5 video and H.264 – what history tells us and why we’re standing with the web article mentions that the history of GIF shows us what happens when patented technologies are used on the web and what happens when network effects over-run the natural drive to royalty-free technologies at scale. At one time Unisys was asking some web site owners $5,000-$7,500 to able to use GIFs on their sites (good that those patents expired). This is still instructive.

MP3 pricing gives us a glimpse into the strategy around H.264 licensing could be in the future. We know that MP3 was licensed quite liberally early in its lifespan. They changed that after the network effects had already taken their toll. But as the cycle continued and MP3 became a requirement for playback the pricing changed to where we are today (royalty rate of about $1 per unit).

H_264_400

H.264 is currently liberally licensed and also has a license that changes from year to year, depending on market conditions. In worst case we’re looking at the same situation with H.264, except at a far larger scale. Something that’s free today might not be free tomorrow. Remember, this is still very early in H.264’s history so the licensing is very friendly. When everyone is relying the technology, it’s time to change pricing.

Google’s YouTube HTML5 version it only works with Safari and Chrome because they’re using H.264. Firefox supports the HTML5 video element, but only for free Ogg Theora video (that works
with all of the desktop browsers, either via native support or via a Java plugin). Mozilla and the folks pushing Theora are going to look like they’ve been crying wolf, but they have a point.

The web has always been based on the assumption of Royalty Free. In fact, participation in a working group at the W3C requires that any parties disclose and make available any essential claims on the technology covered by that working group. This leads to the obvious question: is the codec a fundamental web technology? The HTML5 working group argued and punted on the issue.

Maybe in the mean time we have almost 6 years to settle in and then MPEG-LA decides to start charging for Internet content. Hopefully this gives time people time to properly develop a more open codec that can compete with H.264 (that it technically excellent). If there are at that time good alternatives available, it is harder to start charging unreasonable amounts of money for the use of H.264.

There is an alliance of free video technology forming. The Open Video Alliance, which includes Mozilla, Kaltura, Miro, and Yale Law School, are joining forces to bring video to Wikipedia – Flash-free. Wikipedia is the most popular site in the world that posts video exclusively in open formats (specifically, Theora).

Take advantage of open-source hardware

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

It does not always pay to design everything from ground up. Basing your product on a reference design or demo board can speed time to market. And on hobby projects using ready designs can help you so that you can concentrate using your time on the most interesting parts instead spending most of the time on the design yourself for all those part you consider not so interesting. Take advantage of open-source hardware article tells that open-source hardware offers an advanced start on your design. Open-source software complements open-source hardware. You may even want to share your improvements by making them open-source additions, as well. Article is available in both HTML and PDF version.

Electrolytic capacitor failures

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

The most common reasons that modern digital electronics devices fail seem to be a bad electrolytic capacitors. Bad electrolytic capacitors cause frequent failures of switch mode power supplies. It seems power supplies are often the weakest link in many modern electronics devices.

Since there is tremendous price pressure on PC’s and other consumer electronics devices, there is great pressure for a low-cost power supply, which often means several things. Low-cost components with limited life are often used, circuit components that might limit secondary failures are left out, and parts are often used at or beyond their ratings, causing poor reliability and short life.

The weakest link in power supply is usually one of the electrolytic capacitors. Usually electronics repair people need to replace more electrolytic capacitors than any other electronic components in electronic repair. The aluminum electrolytic capacitor has a limited life span. This occurs because the electrolyte in the element eventually dissipates. Since electrolytic capacitors are not hermetically sealed, the electrolyte in these capacitor eventually evaporates causing increased ESR which causes increased heating, which causes the safety seal on the capacitor to pop, because if it does not pop, the capacitor explodes. Once these capacitors fail, they can cause all kinds of secondary failures. Why this kind of often failing components are then used? By combining small size and very low cost per unit capacitance, electrolytic capacitors are the only cost-effective choice for high-value applications like power supply filtering in most consumer gear.

The changes in performance over time can be described as follows: Eventually, the capacitance begins to drop off and internal resistance (ESR) starts to increase. The loss in capacitor begins to increase, causing it to heat up more and go bad more quickly. Finally, at the end of the life span, the capacitor enters an open circuit mode as the dielectric dries up. More details can be found at Reliabity of Aluminum Elecrolytic Capacitors document.

The capacitor plague involved the common premature failure of certain brands of electrolytic capacitors used in various electronics equipment, and particularly in motherboards, video cards, compact fluorescent lamp ballasts, LCD monitors, and power supplies of personal computers. The first flawed capacitors were seen in 1999, some bad capacitors were still being sold or integrated into designs as of early 2007. An incorrect electrolyte formula within a faulty capacitor causes the production of hydrogen gas, leading to bulging or deformation of the capacitor’s case, and eventual venting of the electrolyte.

image004

A serious quality control problem is that good and poor quality electrolytic capacitors will often have identical electrical performance when newly fitted. But when the bad capacitors are stressed for a long time with high ripple current in hot environment, their electrical performance changes considerably causing the common premature failure. Most other electronic components which are much less subject to spontaneous failure after assembly.

Criteria for Defining Failures in Aluminum Dielectric Capacitors could be something like this:
1. Considerable changes in capacitance is noticed. A failure is defined as a change in capacitance from the initial capacitance level beyond the specified range. The change is generally ±20% to ±30%.
2. Change in Equivalent Series Resistance (ESR). A failure is defined as the component exceeding the specified range. Usually, this range is 1.5 to 3.0 times the initial value.
3. Change in leakage current. The definition of failure occurs when there is an excess of the specification values.

As you can see measuring the capacitance with a multimeter with capacitance meter functionality does not tell the whole story. It is wise to invest on ESR meter which can test e-caps in or off board. If you like building electronics circuits, you can make your own ESR meter based on An Equivalent Series Resistance Meter plans you can find at http://www.ludens.cl/Electron/esr/esr.html. I have successfully built this circuit and I can tell it works well.

Replacing and reforming electrolytic capacitors was quite common before the current throw-away culture took hold. Some people and companies still repair and replace electrolytic capacitors, but usually it is cheaper to throw broken electronics away than it is to perform preventive maintenance or repair it. To pick electronics that last, look for products that have the longest warranties. Since it is VERY expensive for manufacturers to repair computers and other electronics under warranty, they usually pick parts and de-rating to make sure their product lasts at least as long as the warranty.

Before designing electronics that uses electrolytic capacitors, read Application Guide, Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors to know how to use them correctly.

Ecosia green search

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

Green his the web. Ecosia is a new Internet search engine backed by Yahoo, Bing and the World Wide Fund For Nature (WWF). According to site description it basically works like any other search engine but, it gives most (80%) if it’s advertising revenue to a rainforest protection program run by the WWF. Ecosia users can earn money for the program save about two square meters of rainforest with every search they do according to the information provided on the Ecosia web pages. Maybe using this search engine will not save the whole world, but he green search model has the potential to become a source of funding for environmental projects. But there is a competition on that field. A number of organisations are attempting to convert sponsored links into revenue for environmental projects.

ecosia

Design by Community Smartphone

Saturday, March 20th, 2010

Do you want to help create a smartphone concept device of the future? Between March and May 2010 Nokia wants to harness the collective thoughts of the Conversations readership to map out a concept device of the future. It is a six-step process where you get to vote for the features and functions you think are most important. Every week the page will tally up the votes and display the defined spec in the Data Sheet below. The form to fill in your preferences can be found at http://conversations.nokia.com/design-by-community/. Interesting idea to get feedback for product design.

nokiacommunityspecs

Unshielded RCA cable is bad design

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Here is a bit long article about HIFI system interconnect cables. There are pages promoting use of different unshielded cable constructions for HIFI systems interconnections. But the truth is that unshielded RCA cable is bad design and should be avoided. This article tells the truth about unshielded RCA cables, why they are bad and how many pages promoting them are wrong.

Nearly any signal that uses RCA connectors are considered line level. These are very weak signals (0.1-2V) and will pick up noise easily (unbalanced, output impedance can be up to 5000 ohms). RCA connectors are also used to carry sometimes phono signals, those are even weaker and will pick up noise even more easily than line level signals.

Interconnects with RCA plugs should be made with coax cable or shielded twisted pair cable to work well. Typically interconnects with RCA plugs are made with coax cable. The coax encases the signal wire in a pipe that protects it from interference.

1core-sh

Unshielded cable, like ordinary speaker wire or CAT5 UTP, is unsuitable cable for RCA interconnections. It will pick up noise very easily. This noise is usually heard as  a low level fuzz (less than totally silent background)  and obvious hum.

Your speaker level wires (with about 10-30 volts signal typically 8 ohm load impedance and fractions of ohms amplifier output) are much less sensitive to radiated noise than the RCA signal wires. That’s why they can live well without shielding.

Line level cables use considerably lower signal voltages and very much higher impedance, so they pick up noise more easily. For interconnects shielded construction is the way to go for line level RCA interconnects. Shielding on unbalanced interconnects does make a big difference in the background noise level.

Unshielded twisted pair cable, like CAT5 networking cable, is bad idea for RCA interconnects. It is true that due to its characteristic CAT5 and similar have low capacitance, but that’s where the good news end.

utp

You might have read that that UTP cable construction has good noise rejection characteristics and can carry signals well without shielding. CAT5 cables used in a computer network system are renowned for their ability to reject unwanted noises. It is true that twisted pair geometry works for the phone companies who run miles of cable and for Ethernet LANs very well without noise problems. Unshielded twisted pair works and rejects noise in those applications well because it is used in them to carry balanced signals.

Cat 5 and similar unshielded twisted pair (UTP) cables only work effectively when run as balanced lines where there are common-mode noise rejection properties built into the system. That common mode rejection is easily accomplished when the receiving circuit is passive (headphones or loudspeaker), transformer coupled, isolated and battery operated, or otherwise not referenced in any way to the transmitting-circuit common (either capacitively or resistively connected). For best performance the signal signal sending end should have same impedance from both signal wires to ground.

When you wire unshielded twisted pair to unbalanced signal source and receiver RCA connectors, most of the good properties of the UTP cable noise rejection are lost.  Unbalanced RCA interfaces found in normal HIFI equipment do not have common-mode noise rejection properties. The coupled noise will get to the signal on the cable. Therefore UTP is not effective for unbalanced home/consumer applications.Read Cat5 cable VS RCA cable for car stereo use article if you want to see test results.

There are also special unshielded braided unshielded cable construction made for HIFI interconnects. Those suffer from the same basic problems as the unshielded twisted pair cables, although some designs might offer a slightly better noise rejection characteristics than twisted pair. But they are still poorly shielded and should be avoided.

4play_plugs

(image from 4-Play)

Unshielded unbalanced cables are very sensitive to capacitive coupling especially when circuit impedance is high (impedance mostly determined by signal source output impedance in HIFI systems). For example power cords radiate a magnetic field and an electric field that is prone to carrying the interference that rides on all AC power lines to some extent. Shielding is an essential part of a proper RCA audio cable.  It is true that shielded cable has higher total cable capacitance than otherwise similar unshielded cable, but that’s the price you have to pay for the noise free sound.

The cable capacitance can affect the sound going through the cable. The most typical effect is that the cable capacitance together with signal source output impedance forms a low pass filter that more or less attenuates the highest frequencies. How much cable capacitance effect depends very much on the signal source output impedance (output impedance is typically in 30 ohms to 5000 ohms range, much bigger variation range than in capacitance of different audio cable types). If the signal source badly engineered, then the cable capacitance affects the signal source output driver amplifier stability, causing distortion and risk of oscillation at high cable capacitance. A well designed HIFIi equipment should be designed to cope with the normal cable capacitance. If the capacitance of normal shielded cable has considerable effect on the sound you get, there is something wrong with your signal source!

Some HIFI manufacturers (especially cable manufacturers that make such cables) say that unshielded unbalanced cables generally sound better than shielded (if your area does not have a lot of RF energy). If you are so lucky that you don’t have such noise sources nearby and like playing then you can try unshielded cable if you wish. Anyways in today’s high tech world  it is hard to find places without much RF energy nearby because for example cellular phones are very common and cause lots of noise if placed nearby unshielded cable. All well designed interconnects sound identical. Some interconnects are badly designed and do indeed sound different.

In today’s modern world you should always use shielded RCA cable. A coaxial design with a braided mesh shield is a good choice and braid shielded twisted pair is also good for making RCA cables. All well designed interconnects sound identical. Some interconnects are badly designed and do indeed sound different. Unshielded RCA cables are conceptually bad designs and should be avoided. Unshielded cables are OK only for applications that use balanced signals (professional audio), but even in those applications using shielded cables is the preferred.

ePanorama.net is now in twitter

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

ePanorama.net has now a Twitter account so you can how follow the news related to this blog and ePanorama.net site in general. Twitter user name you should follow is epanoramanet.

frontpage-birdlogo


film izle - komedi filmi izle - film izle - film izle - film izle