Greenpeace report How Clean is Your Cloud? I saw mentioned in 3T magazine news is actually quite interesting reading. This year’s report provides a look at the energy choices some of the largest and fastest growing IT companies. The report analyzes the 14 IT companies and the electricity supply chain in more than 80 data center cases.
The report contains also lots of interesting background information on both IT and telecom energy consumption. I recommend checking it out. Here are some points picked from How Clean is Your Cloud? report:
Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo – these global brands and a host of other IT companies are rapidly and fundamentally transforming the way in which we work, communicate, watch movies or TV, listen to music, and share pictures through “the cloud.”
The growth and scale of investment in the cloud is truly mind-blowing, with estimates of a 50-fold increase in the amount of digital information by 2020 and nearly half a trillion in investment in the coming year, all to create and feed our desire for ubiquitous access to infinite information from our computers, phones and other mobile devices, instantly.
The engine that drives the cloud is the data center. Data centers are the factories of the 21st century information age, containing thousands of computers that store and manage our rapidly growing collection of data for consumption at a moment’s notice. Given the energy-intensive nature of maintaining the cloud, access to significant amounts of electricity is a key factor in decisions about where to build these data centers. Industry leaders estimate nearly $450bn US dollars is being spent annually on new data center space.
Since electricity plays a critical role in the cost structure of companies that use the cloud, there have been dramatic strides made in improving the energy efficiency design of the facilities and the thousands of computers that go inside. However, despite significant improvements in efficiency, the exponential growth in cloud computing far outstrips these energy savings.
How much energy is required to power the ever-expanding online world? What percentage of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is attributable to the IT sector? Answers to these questions are very difficult to obtain with any degree of precision, partially due to the sector’s explosive growth, a wide range of devices and energy sources, and rapidly changing technology and business models. The estimates of the IT sector’s carbon footprint performed to date have varied widely in their methodology and scope. One of the most recognized estimates of the IT sector’s footprint was conducted as part of the 2008 SMART 2020 study, which established that the sector is responsible for 2% of global GHG emissions.
The combined electricity demand of the internet/cloud (data centers and telecommunications network) globally in 2007 was approximately 623bn kWh (if the cloud were a country, it would have the fifth largest electricity demand in the world). Based on current projections, the demand for electricity will more than triple to 1,973bn kWh (an amount greater than combined total demand of France, Germany, Canada and Brazil).
The report indicates that, due to the economic downturn and continued energy efficiency and performance improvements, global energy demand from data centers from 2005-2010 increased by 56%. Estimates of data center electricity demand come in at 31GW globally, with an increase of 19% in 2012 alone. At the same time global electricity consumption is otherwise essentially flat due to the global recession is still a staggering rate of growth.
Given the scale of predicted growth, the source of electricity must be factored into a meaningful definition of “green IT”. Energy efficiency alone will, at best, slow the growth of the sector’s footprint. The replacement of dirty sources of electricity with clean renewable sources is still the crucial missing link in the sector’s sustainability efforts according to the report.
The global telecoms sector is also growing rapidly. Rapid growth in use of smart phones and broadband mobile connections mean mobile data traffic in 2011 was eight times the size of the entire internet in 2000. It is estimated that global mobile data traffic grew 133% in 2011, with 597 petabytes of data sent by mobiles every month. In 2011, it is estimated that 6 billion people or 86.7% of the entire global population have mobile telephone subscriptions. By the end of 2012, the number of mobile connected devices is expected to exceed the global population. Electronic devices and the rapidly growing cloud that supports our demand for greater online access are clearly a significant force in driving global energy demand.
What about telecoms in the developing and newly industrialized countries? The report has some details from India (by the way it is expected that India will pass China to become the world’s largest mobile market in terms of subscriptions in 2012). Much of the growth in the Indian telecom sector is from India’s rural and semi-urban areas. By 2012, India is likely to have 200 million rural telecom connections at a penetration rate of 25%. Out of the existing 400,000 mobile towers, over 70% exist in rural and semi-urban areas where either grid-connected electricity is not available or the electricity supply is irregular. As a result, mobile towers and, increasingly, grid-connected towers in these areas rely on diesel generators to power their network operations. The consumption of diesel by the telecoms sector currently stands at a staggering 3bn liters annually, second only to the railways in India.
What is the case on other developing and newly industrialized countries? I don’t actually know.
NOTE: Please note that that many figures given on the report are just estimates based on quite little actual data, so they might be somewhat off the actual figures. Given the source of the report I would quess that if the figures are off, they are most probably off to direction so that the environmental effect looks bigger than it actually is.
1,267 Comments
Tomi Engdahl says:
The phrase “The data center also uses evaporative cooling, which is effective in the dry desert climate” reveals the major environmental catch in this post.
While solar panels and batteries solve the electricity problem, relying on evaporative cooling in Phoenix, Arizona creates a direct conflict with local water security.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Claims from
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19ak6aoH2M/
Let’s spend a trillion dollars on solo/ wind farms to supply 17% of the US’s power needs which requires 50 times as much arable land to build the equivalent of 40 nuclear power plants for the same sum of money. When the 40 nuclear plants can run 24 hours a day requiring minimum maintenance for up to 80 years , the renewables will be lucky to run for six to eight hours a day for maybe 15 years before they’re scrapped. Sounds like a great idea! Yes?
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19oLhiQL35/
AI Data Centers Could Soon Eat Up Nearly A Fifth Of America’s Power
Global data center electricity consumption is projected to reach 565 terawatt-hours in 2026, up 26% from 447 terawatt-hours in 2025, according to Gartner. The US alone will account for about 204 terawatt-hours of that total — 36% of worldwide consumption — with dedicated AI data centers responsible for 68 terawatt-hours, a full third of the US figure.
Research firm EPRI projects data centers could consume between 9% and 17% of all US electricity by 2030, up from just 4-5% today, depending on how quickly planned and under-construction projects come online. AI-optimized servers are expected to account for 31% of global data center power use in 2026, and to overtake conventional servers in power consumption by 2027.
The US Energy Information Administration has raised its national electricity demand forecast accordingly, projecting total consumption to climb from 4,097 billion kilowatt-hours to 4,283 billion kilowatt-hours by 2026, with commercial-sector electricity use — driven largely by data centers — expected to grow up to 5% annually.
Source: Gartner / U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2026
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1HYoDQWyC2/
The data center that grows its own fuel. In Germany, a data center has partnered with a biofuel company to use its waste heat to grow algae. The algae absorb CO₂ and produce oils that can be converted to biofuel. The system uses the data center’s heat to maintain optimal growth temperatures, turning a waste product into a renewable fuel source. The algae are grown in photobioreactors — clear tubes filled with water and nutrients — attached to the data center. The biofuel produced can be used for transportation or power generation. This is a pioneering example of circular economy: waste heat becomes food for algae, which becomes fuel. The same server that heats the algae is powered by renewable energy, so the whole chain is carbon‑neutral. The future of data centers is not just about computing; it’s about producing food, fuel, and heat. The cloud is growing its own energy, one algae cell at a time. The data center is becoming a farm. #datacenterheat #algae #biofuel #circulareconomy #germanyinnovation
Tomi Engdahl says:
Tomi Engdahl is there some way to recycle the water, to recover it.
Joe Eafrati Yes, it is technically possible to recapture the water vapor after it evaporates, but doing so is a massive fight against thermodynamics.
Evaporative cooling works because turning liquid water into vapor absorbs a massive amount of heat (the latent heat of vaporization).
To turn that vapor back into liquid water on-site, you have to extract that exact same amount of heat. If a facility tries to condense the vapor by running it over mechanical cooling coils, it requires massive amounts of electricity to chill those coils. The energy required to condense the steam completely cancels out the energy you saved by using evaporative cooling in the first place. Plus there will be other losses.
Joe Eafrati Closed-loop cooling—specifically when paired with dry air coolers—is widely considered superior to evaporative recycling for long-term sustainability. Eliminating operational evaporation entirely yields advantages: Zero Operational Water Loss, No “Blowdown” Chemical Waste.
The Only Catch: The Energy Penalty
While closed-loop systems solve the water problem completely, they trade water savings for higher electrical draw.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1PdPxakJpA/
For years, wind power has been one of the biggest forces behind the global renewable-energy boom. But the balance is shifting.
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), solar PV generation is forecast to grow by around 600 TWh in 2026. That surge is expected to push solar ahead of wind, making it the world’s second-largest renewable source of electricity generation, behind hydropower.
The change is being driven by rapid solar deployment, falling technology costs and massive additions of solar capacity around the world. In 2025 alone, solar PV accounted for more than three-quarters of new renewable power capacity added globally.
Importantly, this doesn’t mean wind power is disappearing. Wind generation is also expected to keep growing—the headline reflects a shift in global electricity generation, not the end of wind energy.
Source: International Energy Agency (IEA), Electricity 2026 / Electricity Mid-Year Update 2026.
What do you think will shape the next decade of clean energy—solar, wind, or something else?
Visuals are AI Illustrated.
#SolarEnergy #RenewableEnergy #CleanEnergy #EnergyTransition #ScienceFacts
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1aCn6CjVuk/
The cloud may be invisible, but its environmental footprint is very real.
Every email, online search, and AI-generated response depends on physical infrastructure. Behind the digital world are enormous data centers filled with servers that require electricity, cooling, and increasingly large amounts of land.
As AI expands, so does the demand for these resources. The International Energy Agency estimates that data centers consumed about 1.5% of global electricity in 2024 and projects that their demand could more than double by 2030.
Water is another growing concern. Many facilities use water-based cooling systems, while electricity generation and the manufacturing of computer components can add to their wider water footprint. The impact varies considerably depending on the facility’s location, cooling technology, and energy source.
For communities already facing water shortages, grid constraints, or pressure on natural habitats, a new data center can raise difficult questions about who receives the benefits and who bears the environmental costs.
There are solutions. More efficient chips, closed-loop cooling, recycled water, renewable energy, and better site planning can reduce the impact. But these measures are not automatically enough to offset rapid growth, and some cooling technologies involve trade-offs between water and electricity use.
The challenge is not simply choosing between technology and nature. It is ensuring that technological progress does not come at the expense of the communities and ecosystems that sustain us.
No data center should be worth sacrificing a community’s access to clean water, a healthy environment, or peace of mind.
Source: BBC Politics Live, “Should we be worried about the environmental impacts of AI data centres?” (June 10, 2026); International Energy Agency, Energy and AI (2025).
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DQXNakJrh/
The idea is simple but unusual: place sealed computing modules on the seabed and let the surrounding seawater help remove the enormous amount of heat produced by servers.
China already has a commercial underwater data center operating off Lingshui in Hainan. The facility began commercial operations in 2023, and a newer computing module added in 2025 can hold more than 400 high-performance servers. The system has been used for AI training, industrial simulation, game development and other computing workloads.
Seawater is at the heart of the concept. Instead of relying entirely on conventional air-conditioning equipment, the underwater modules transfer heat into the surrounding ocean. This can sharply reduce the electricity needed for cooling, which is becoming an increasingly important issue as AI systems demand more computing power.
China is now taking the idea another step further in Shanghai. A new underwater data-center project in the Lingang Special Area is being developed alongside offshore wind farms, allowing electricity generated at sea to power submerged computing equipment directly. The planned project has a total capacity of 24 megawatts, with a 2.3 MW demonstration phase.
The project is designed around two resources that coastal cities have in abundance: seawater for cooling and offshore wind for electricity. Shanghai officials say the system has already demonstrated a power usage effectiveness of around 1.15, while estimates indicate electricity consumption can be reduced by 22.8 percent and freshwater use eliminated.
There is another advantage. A large conventional data center requires valuable land, while underwater modules can operate beneath the sea without occupying large areas onshore. The Shanghai project estimates that underwater deployment can reduce land use by more than 90 percent.
The approach could become especially interesting as AI computing expands. Modern servers generate huge amounts of heat, and cooling that equipment can consume a significant share of a data center’s electricity. Using the ocean as a natural heat sink offers a different way to handle that problem.
But putting expensive computers underwater creates its own engineering challenges. The pressure vessels must remain sealed, equipment has to operate reliably in a harsh marine environment, and repairing hardware is far more complicated than replacing a server inside a conventional building. Long-term reliability and maintenance costs will determine how widely the technology can be deployed.
China has also begun establishing technical standards for underwater data centers. A national industry standard for testing marine underwater data centers took effect in November 2025, covering testing methods for systems deployed in the ocean.
The technology is not about replacing every land-based data center. It is an experimental approach to a growing problem: how to provide more computing power while controlling electricity, cooling, freshwater and land requirements.
As AI pushes demand for high-density computing higher, the future data center may not always look like a giant building filled with servers.
Some of them could be sitting quietly on the seabed, powered by offshore wind and cooled by the ocean around them.
#China
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Bt4yTcfPt/
Nature’s carbon sink failing under the weight of human emissions. Carbon pollution now officially outpaces the absorption capacity of forests and oceans.
For millennia, Earth’s forests, oceans, and soils have acted as reliable planetary thermostats, absorbing roughly half of all human-induced carbon emissions.
However, scientists are sounding the alarm that this vital buffer is rapidly failing. As global temperatures climb, driven by the burning of fossil fuels and extensive deforestation, these natural carbon sinks are becoming overwhelmed and structurally weakened.
Intense wildfires, prolonged droughts, and marine heatwaves have dramatically reduced the ability of ecosystems to capture and store carbon, leaving an ever-larger volume of greenhouse gases to accumulate in the atmosphere.
This widening gap between carbon production and natural absorption threatens to trigger a dangerous feedback loop, accelerating global heating far faster than current climate models predict. When sinks like the Amazon rainforest or marine ecosystems degrade, they transition from absorbing carbon to releasing it, compounding the crisis. Experts warn that relying on nature to clean up industrial pollution is no longer a viable strategy, highlighting the urgent necessity of rapid, deep decarbonization at the source before these critical environmental safety nets collapse entirely.
source: Greenfield, P. Trees and land absorbed almost no CO2 last year. Is nature’s carbon sink failing? The Guardian.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1YH5BRaacX/
A groundbreaking geophysical study has revealed that human consumption of underground water reserves has grown so massive that it has literally shifted the Earth’s rotational pole.
Between 1993 and 2010, human civilization pumped an estimated 2,150 gigatons of groundwater from deep subterranean aquifers, primarily to sustain agricultural irrigation, municipal water networks, and industrial manufacturing.
Because water possesses substantial physical mass, extracting it from localized underground pockets and allowing it to eventually flow into the global ocean system alters how weight is distributed across the surface of the spinning planet.
This massive redistributive shift caused the Earth’s rotational pole to drift by approximately 31.5 inches toward the 64°E longitude line during that seventeen-year window alone, providing undeniable proof that human activity can measurably alter planetary mechanics.
Geophysicists isolate this polar motion by utilizing advanced satellite telemetry and climate modeling software to trace the exact path of the planet’s rotational axis.
As illustrated in the scientific model above, comparing the observed path (OBS) against estimates that exclude groundwater (w/o GW) reveals a massive discrepancy; only when factoring in groundwater depletion (w/ GW) does the model align with reality.
While the geographical position of the core aquifers matters immensely—with the heaviest extractions occurring in mid-latitude regions like northwestern India and western North America—the aggregate water loss simultaneously contributed 6.24 millimeters of direct sea-level rise.
While this rotational shift is too small to impact daily atmospheric weather patterns or satellite communication systems, the underlying depletion presents immediate ecological dangers, including widespread land subsidence, the collapse of structural topsoil, and irreversible saltwater intrusion into remaining freshwater basins.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1dkepEyQVJ/
A growing wave of research is revealing that AI data centers carry a far heavier environmental cost than earlier estimates suggested. A 2026 study by Allianz Trade found these facilities emitted 286 million tonnes of CO2 in 2025 alone — around 57% higher than projections from the International Energy Agency. Separately, Cornell researchers calculated that by 2030, AI’s current growth rate could add 24 to 44 million metric tons of carbon dioxide annually, roughly equal to putting 5 to 10 million extra cars on U.S. roads, while also draining hundreds of millions of cubic meters of water each year for cooling systems. Even more surprising, new studies have found these massive server farms create localized “heat islands,” raising surrounding land temperatures by several degrees and affecting communities up to six miles away. As AI adoption accelerates worldwide, scientists warn that without major investments in renewable energy, efficient cooling technology, and smarter site planning, the environmental toll of this digital boom could scale up dramatically faster than most people realize.
#AI #climatechange #datacenters #sustainability #environment
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14rdwuTjrsx/
A new scientific model projects Earth’s drylands will eventually cover over 40% of the globe, threatening billions of lives.
Our planet is on the verge of a dramatic geographical shift. According to a new study published in Environmental Research Letters, the relentless rise of global temperatures is driving a significant expansion of Earth’s drylands—regions where water loss from soil evaporation and plant transpiration outpaces rainfall.
If current climate trends persist, these arid landscapes are projected to creep forward to cover more than 40% of the world’s total land area by the end of this century. This shift from humid to dry climates represents a looming crisis for vulnerable communities, as it threatens to spark severe water shortages, fuel desertification, and disrupt fragile agricultural systems.
While rising carbon dioxide levels may partially slow this expansion by helping plants retain water, scientists warn that the overall trend remains alarming. As drylands swallow once-productive areas, ecosystems will face unprecedented degradation, pushing millions of livelihoods to the brink.
Mitigating these shifts is no longer just an environmental goal, but a global humanitarian necessity. Adapting to this drier reality will require international cooperation, updated climate modeling, and a profound commitment to sustainable water management to secure a viable future for affected populations.
source: Cai, Y., Wang, F., Pan, Y., & Lu, Q. (2026). CO2-altered evapotranspiration moderates future global dryland expansion under climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 21(17).
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19UWftuvxP/
Hello
All existing energy systems harm nature and living beings and create a climate crisis. The SES TURBINE SYSTEM does not harm nature or living beings and does not create a climate crisis. It is possible to build the world’s most perfect and powerful turbines. The only system that can meet the world’s electricity needs forever is the SES TURBINE SYSTEM. Every square meter of the world has an infinite, harmless, uninterrupted, safe, and powerful energy source.
Solar Energy:
It is possible to produce 1000 kWh of energy with 1700 solar panels on a 17-acre area. It is possible to produce 1000 MWH of infinite, uninterrupted, harmless, and safe energy with a SES TURBINE SYSTEM on a 12-acre area. The cost of one solar panel is $425 x 1,700,000 panels = $722,500,000. The cost of this turbine is $20,000,000.
The energy produced by 1,700,000 panels is equal to the energy produced by just one SOLAR POWER turbine.
1 MWH = 1000 KWH
$722,500,000 : $20,000,000 = 36, approximately equivalent to 36 SOLAR POWER TURBINES.
Wind Energy:
The world’s largest or most powerful wind turbine produces 25 MW of energy. Its cost is between $30 and $40 million.
Hydroelectric:
The world’s largest or most powerful turbines are used in the Chinese dam. Each turbine produces 700 MW of energy. The Chinese dam has 32 turbines. 700 x 32 = 22,400 MW of energy is produced. It cost 170 billion dollars… 170 billion dollars : 20 million dollars = 8500 SES Turbine Systems… 8500 SES x 1000 MW = 8,500,000 MW of energy would have been produced… 8500 SES – 32 = 265 times more energy would have been produced…
Nuclear Energy:
Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant consists of 4 reactors, and each reactor will produce 1200 MW of energy. Its cost is 22 billion dollars… 22 billion dollars : 20 million dollars = 1100 SES turbines. If each SES turbine is 1000 MW, then 1100 x 1000 = 1,100,000 MW of energy would be produced. 1,100,000 : 4800 = 229 times more electrical energy can be produced.
It will be the only turbine system that can generate uninterrupted electrical energy regardless of weather conditions. I am looking for a country or individual to invest in this project.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18Ya9rGrjW/
The data center that doesn’t drink a drop. In Nevada, a data center has implemented a closed‑loop geothermal cooling system that uses the Earth’s stable underground temperature to cool servers without consuming any water. The system circulates a fluid through underground pipes, where it’s cooled by the ground, then returns to the data center. This eliminates the need for evaporative cooling, which consumes millions of gallons of water in traditional data centers. Nevada’s desert climate makes water conservation critical, and this technology is a breakthrough for arid regions. The data center is also powered by 100% renewable solar and geothermal electricity. The same Earth that cools the building also powers it. The data center that stores your cloud data is now water‑neutral, in one of the driest states in America. The future of data center cooling is underground, closed, and dry. The desert is no longer a barrier; it’s an asset. #geothermalcooling #nevadadatacenter #waterneutral #sustainablecomputing #cleanenergy
Tomi Engdahl says:
The data centers are planned to be cooled in a way that is cheapest to build+operate and they can get away using it. Evaporative cooling that uses lots of water has been the most cost efficient way to cool down data centers built to hot + dry areas (used to be USA data centers “gold standard” for quite many years). There exist other cooling technologies that are somewhat more expensive to build and operate.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19PBMPHhfs/
They told us going paperless would save the planet.
It turns out the cost just moved somewhere hidden. Every search, video call, and cloud file lives inside massive data centers that run hot and need constant cooling. A single large facility can use up to five million gallons of water a day, enough for a town of fifty thousand people.
Researchers tracking global AI growth warn that worldwide data center water use could more than double by 2030. It is strange to think the device in your hand is quietly drying up a river somewhere far away. Maybe going digital was never really paperless.
Sources: Environmental and Energy Study Institute, International Energy Agency, Google Environmental Report
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1eJwe598Nv/
The data center that grows food. In Norway, a data center has partnered with a local agricultural company to use its waste heat for greenhouses. The heat from the servers, which would otherwise be vented into the atmosphere, is captured and used to warm greenhouses growing tomatoes, cucumbers, and herbs. This is the first commercial data center farm in the world. The greenhouses are located next to the data center, and the heat is delivered through a closed‑loop water system. The project also uses CO₂ from a nearby biogas plant to enrich the greenhouse atmosphere, boosting plant growth. The result: fresh, local produce grown with zero additional energy. The data center’s cooling problem becomes the farm’s heating solution. The server that streams your movie is also growing your salad. This is the circular economy at its finest: waste heat becomes food. The future of data centers might be as much about agriculture as about algorithms. The cloud is feeding the world, one greenhouse at a time. #datacenterheat #greenhouse #norwayagriculture #circularcomputing #wasteheatrecovery
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/1D8g8R6x2Q/
Erin Brockovich is now tracking over 10,000 concerns regarding AI data centers across the United States.
Renowned environmental advocate Erin Brockovich has taken at AI, spearheading a crowdsourced database that catalogs public anxieties over massive data centers.
As of early September, her AI Data Center Reporting initiative has logged nearly 10,000 community-reported locations nationwide. Operating under the slogan that “the race to build AI infrastructures is unfolding town by town,” the initiative allows residents to upload photos, descriptions, and location pins to map facilities that are operational, under construction, or proposed
. The site brings crucial visibility to localized struggles, empowering residents to identify which municipal boundaries or unincorporated county zones hold authority over the sites.
While the interactive map does not represent verified environmental violations, it highlights a stark national pattern of escalating friction between tech giants and local communities. Residents living near these energy-intensive developments are raising urgent, practical questions regarding massive electricity demands, relentless low-frequency noise, electronic waste, and severe strain on local water supplies. By aggregating individual concerns alongside public filings and media reports, Brockovich’s initiative is designed to dismantle “secretive” backdoor developer deals and secure transparency for ordinary citizens before irreversible zoning decisions are finalized.
source: Dhanesha, N. (2026). Erin Brockovich made a map to track data centers around the country. Nieman Journalism Lab.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1RFRgVJsTP/
The data center that runs on hydrogen, not just backs up with it. In the UK, a data center has become the first in the world to use a hydrogen fuel cell as its primary power source, not just for backup. The fuel cell provides 1 MW of continuous power, supplemented by solar and battery storage. The hydrogen is produced from renewable electricity through electrolysis, making the entire chain carbon‑free. The system is a testbed for a future where data centers run entirely on green hydrogen, with no connection to the fossil grid. The UK, with its growing offshore wind fleet and hydrogen strategy, is a natural home for this technology. The data center’s only emission is water vapor. The server that hosts your website is running on the lightest element in the universe. The future of data center power is hydrogen, and it’s already here. The cloud is getting lighter, element by element. #hydrogendatacenter #fuelcell #ukenergy #greenhydrogen #cleanpower
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/1A49WhWwD7/
China has officially surpassed coal in installed power capacity, with solar reaching about 1,286 GW by the end of July 2026, slightly above coal’s 1,285 GW. Solar now represents roughly 31.5% of China’s total installed generation capacity.
The milestone does not mean solar produces more electricity than coal. Coal still generated about 49.7% of China’s electricity in the first half of 2026, while solar generation totaled about 802.4 billion kWh during the first seven months.
The difference comes from how power plants operate: solar only generates electricity when sunlight is available, while coal plants can operate around the clock. China therefore still relies heavily on coal even as its solar capacity expands rapidly.
Still, the shift is significant because the world’s largest coal consumer now has more solar capacity than coal capacity. China added about 86.15 GW of solar capacity in just seven months, showing how quickly its electricity system is changing.
Sources:
China National Energy Administration – NEA
South China Morning Post – SCMP
Reouters
electrek
Xinhua
Tomi Engdahl says:
Many modern data centers do not use practically any water at all and no water for cooling.
There was time in USA (peak around 2010-2020) where the “gold standard” for hyper scale data centers cooling in USA was evaporative cooling that uses lots of water. The standards have changed so that closed loop cooling that does not consume water is the “gold standard” for new data center by big players.
In Europe we never went that big on water consumption and switch to not water consuming happened earlier (Google Hamina data center in Finlabd built 2009 with no water consumption for cooling)
Tomi Engdahl says:
around data centers there is now going on a lot of misunderstandings, lying, propaganda, conspiracies and fake news at the moment. It is no wonder people are confused on what is happening.
Tomi Engdahl says:
They pumped less than 1% of clean water to cool data centers.
They have pumped decades more water that rains back to be able to grow very water thirsty crops in almost desert conditions.
The comparison between data center cooling and desert agriculture highlights a fundamental mismatch in how public attention gets directed toward water resource usage.
The math behind national and regional water withdrawals strongly validates this observation.
Data Centers: Across the United States, all data centers combined consume roughly 17 to 20 billion gallons of water directly on-site per year.
So what is really making your wells dry?
Tomi Engdahl says:
That sarcasm hits on a core frustration in modern environmental policy: the massive gap between individual micro-actions and industrial-scale resource management.
Cardboard Straws & Plastic Bags: Banning single-use plastics targets ocean waste and microplastics, not water consumption.
When evaluating the full manufacturing lifecycle, making a paper straw consumes significantly more water than making a traditional polypropylene plastic straw. Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) show that paper straws require roughly 10 to 100 times more water to produce per unit than plastic or bioplastic alternatives.
Shopping bags tell the exact same story as straws, but at an even larger scale. Just like with straws, plastic bag bans were never meant to conserve water, land, or energy.
When looking strictly at manufacturing resource consumption (water, energy, and raw CO_2 emissions), thin single-use plastic bags (HDPE) are by far the most efficient option to produce. The alternatives meant to replace them carry vastly higher upfront resource debts.
Golden Rule: Use whatever bag you already own until it literally falls apart. Buying a new “eco-friendly” cotton tote at every store counter defeats the entire purpose of sustainability.
According to the landmark Danish Environmental Protection Agency LCA, when accounting for ozone depletion, water use, and land transformation, an organic cotton tote must be reused over 20,000 times to neutralize its environmental impact relative to a thin plastic bag.
Tomi Engdahl says:
The newest generation of US data centers—particularly facilities designed for high-density AI workloads built by Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon—are making a dramatic architectural shift away from open evaporative cooling toward closed-loop dry cooling and zero-water air systems.
Where previous-generation cloud data centers prioritized energy efficiency by using millions of gallons of municipal tap water to cool servers, the newest builds prioritize water independence to bypass local permitting bottlenecks and community pushback.
Tomi Engdahl says:
The newest generation of US data centers—particularly facilities designed for high-density AI workloads built by Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon—are making a dramatic architectural shift away from open evaporative cooling toward closed-loop dry cooling and zero-water air systems.
Where previous-generation cloud data centers prioritized energy efficiency by using millions of gallons of municipal tap water to cool servers, the newest builds prioritize water independence to bypass local permitting bottlenecks and community pushback.
The “Zero Operational Water” Architectural Standard:
Meta: All standard new Meta data center designs use closed-loop air cooling (direct expansion or air-to-air heat exchangers). In normal operating temperatures, they use 0 gallons of water for server cooling. Water is only used in extremely high ambient heat conditions via adiabatic evaporative pads as a backup.
Microsoft: Committed to being water positive by 2030. Microsoft’s standard datacenter design for new facilities built in warm climates (like Phoenix or Texas) uses closed-loop chip cooling combined with dry air coolers, eliminating continuous operational evaporation.
Google: Transitioning to reclaimed municipal wastewater or industrial stormwater for all new facilities where liquid cooling is still deployed, actively phasing out potable drinking water connections for cooling towers.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19XpLGpnp6/
AI looks digital on a screen. Building the systems behind it is anything but. A proposed OpenAI-linked data-center project in Georgia reportedly covers about 1,400 acres, bringing major demands for electricity, cooling, roads and water. The water question is especially important because some data centers rely on water-based cooling, while local groundwater and drinking-water supplies can face added pressure depending on the site and its design. A large data center does not automatically drain a community’s water supply, but the real impact will depend on its water source, cooling system, conservation steps and regulatory rules. The AI boom is increasingly showing its physical footprint, measured in land, power and water.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19eoD6P8uw/
“No data center is worth sacrificing our water, forests, and nature” captures a growing concern as AI infrastructure expands around the world. Data centers may power an invisible digital world, but they depend on very physical resources, including electricity, cooling systems, land, and supporting infrastructure. The International Energy Agency says data centers used about 1.5% of global electricity in 2024.
That demand is expected to rise quickly. The IEA projects global data-center electricity consumption could more than double by 2030, with AI becoming one of the biggest drivers of that growth. Water use can also become a concern in some communities because certain cooling systems require significant amounts of it, while local impacts vary depending on location, technology, and energy sources.
Technology and environmental protection do not have to be enemies. More efficient equipment, thoughtful site selection, cleaner energy, recycled water, and improved cooling can reduce pressure on communities. But local residents deserve transparency about what major projects could mean for their resources and quality of life. Progress should benefit people without forcing communities to choose between innovation and the environment around them.
#fblifestyle #Polarbear #DataCenters #ArtificialIntelligence #Environment
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1HtzvTfsDG/
Rows of computer servers normally require large buildings, cooling equipment, and significant amounts of land. China has developed commercial underwater data-center modules off Hainan, placing computing equipment beneath the sea where naturally cool surrounding water can help carry away the enormous amount of heat produced by servers.
The sealed server modules sit underwater and exchange heat with the surrounding seawater through specially designed cooling systems, reducing the need for conventional freshwater-based cooling. The project has also been paired with nearby offshore wind power, creating a link between marine computing infrastructure and renewable electricity. Moving much of the equipment offshore can reduce the amount of valuable land required for large data-center facilities, while the controlled sealed environment can protect sensitive electronics from outside air, dust, and humidity.
What makes the concept remarkable is that two major infrastructure systems can share the same offshore environment. Wind turbines above the water can generate electricity while data-center modules below use the sea as part of their cooling strategy. It does not make computing impact-free, and underwater facilities require careful engineering and environmental monitoring, but the approach offers a very different way to handle growing digital demand. Instead of building another enormous server complex on land and using freshwater for cooling, some computing capacity can operate quietly beneath the waves.
#UnderwaterDataCenter #GreenTechnology #FutureInfrastructure
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DMdc2EivR/
AI’s Data Center Boom Is Creating a New Environmental Challenge
The rapid growth of AI and cloud computing is driving a major expansion of data centers—and with it, rising demand for electricity, land and cooling resources. The IEA projects global data-center electricity use could roughly double to about 950 TWh by 2030.
The real challenge is often local. A new facility can place significant pressure on electricity grids and, depending on its cooling system and location, compete for water and land with agriculture, ecosystems and nearby communities. That doesn’t mean every data center causes the same impact—but where resources are already limited, the trade-offs can be serious.
AI can bring enormous benefits, but technological progress shouldn’t come at the expense of essential resources. The goal should be smarter data centers—powered responsibly, using water efficiently and built where their environmental costs can be managed.
Source: International Energy Agency (IEA), Energy and AI
#ArtificialIntelligence #DataCenters #WaterConservation #Climate #CleanEnergy
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DL8WKjcyz/
America’s AI expansion is colliding with a resource every community needs: water.
A very large, water-cooled data center can consume as much as five million gallons on a peak day—roughly comparable to the daily, not annual, water use of a town with 30,000 to 50,000 residents. Actual consumption varies enormously: some facilities use evaporative cooling, while air-cooled or closed-loop systems may consume far less water on-site.
The political pushback is real. The National Conference of State Legislatures reported that lawmakers in 15 states had considered restrictions or moratoriums on data-center development by July 2026. However, these proposals have different scopes and outcomes: some remain pending, while others failed or were vetoed.
The growth behind this debate is enormous. Pew Research Center identified more than 3,000 operating U.S. data centers and over 1,500 additional facilities in development. Sixty-seven percent of the planned sites are in rural areas, where communities may have smaller water systems and less capacity to absorb sudden industrial demand. Pew Research Center
Concerns are especially intense around projects proposed in the High Plains region. The underlying High Plains—or Ogallala—Aquifer supports approximately 20% of America’s irrigated land and has experienced major depletion in several areas after decades of agricultural pumping.
AI infrastructure can bring investment and technological capacity, but communities deserve transparent projections for water and electricity use, independent environmental review, and enforceable protections before projects are approved.
The question is not whether technology should advance. It is whether that advancement can occur without transferring its hidden costs to the people, farms and ecosystems that depend on the same limited resources.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/186oX9RDNf/
Thailand has temporarily put 166 data-center projects under review, including 49 facilities already under construction and 117 awaiting approval. The move follows concerns over electricity demand, water consumption, site selection, safety, and environmental impacts as the country’s AI and data-center industry expands rapidly.
The immediate trigger was a diesel spill at an unopened Bangkok data center, where fuel reportedly entered the city’s drainage system during backup-power testing. The incident exposed broader regulatory gaps: Thailand currently has limited centralized information on where data centers are being built and how much electricity and water they will require.
Four government committees have been given about a month to develop new standards covering infrastructure, environmental protection, economic benefits, and site safety.
The government is not abandoning data centers; it is trying to determine how much infrastructure the country can support without shifting the costs onto local communities.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BvqoQub9h/
In Finland, data centers are turning leftover server heat into warmth for thousands of homes and buildings.
Data centers produce large amounts of heat while keeping servers cool, and Finland is increasingly putting that energy to work. In Helsinki, excess heat from Telia’s data center has been fed into the district heating network since 2022, providing heat equivalent to the needs of more than 20,000 homes. Other Finnish projects are expanding the same idea, using recovered data center heat to reduce the need for conventional heating and make better use of energy that might otherwise be wasted.
#Finland #CleanEnergy #Sustainability
References:
Motiva Finland: Energy Efficiency of Data Centers in Finland — Telia Helsinki waste heat supplies district heating for more than 20,000 dwellings.
Helen: Heat Recovery Service for Data Centers — excess data center heat can be recovered and supplied to Finland’s district heating network.
Business Finland: Google’s Hamina heat recovery project is designed to supply an estimated 80% of the city’s district heating needs.
Tomi Engdahl says:
That’s right, keep heating the earth’s oceans. There won’t be any consequences from that.
I don’t expect any noticeable effect from temperature rise that is lower than can be measured.
If every data center on Earth operated continuously for 1,000 years and dumped every joule of heat into the sea, the global ocean temperature would rise by roughly 0.0003 degrees Celsius.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19TLV4UoST/
Norway’s hydropower reservoirs act like enormous energy stores, allowing electricity production to change as demand and other renewable sources change.
Hydropower plants release stored water through turbines to generate electricity. Because water can often be held behind dams and used later, reservoir-based hydropower can respond more flexibly than many other renewable sources. This makes it useful when electricity demand rises or when wind and solar production changes unexpectedly. The stored water effectively gives operators a valuable source of flexibility.
Norway’s geography provides mountains, rivers, and reservoirs that support extensive hydropower generation. The country also has strong connections with neighboring electricity markets, allowing power to move across borders. However, hydropower still depends on rainfall, snowmelt, reservoir levels, environmental restrictions, and other conditions that influence how much water is available for electricity production.
The broader lesson is that renewable electricity needs flexibility as well as generation. Hydropower can provide that flexibility where geography allows it. Norway shows how stored natural energy can help balance a changing electricity system without depending entirely on fossil-fuel plants. It also demonstrates why geography can strongly influence a country’s energy strategy.
Tomi Engdahl says:
according to Elon Musk an area the size of the protected area around nuclear plant is enough to replace the nuclear plant. I dont say its enough to just cover the data center you need to put it on every rooftoop you have, and you need batteries to cover for the hours you cant supply with sun.
https://youtu.be/ZFlgAe1GJFI?is=WSQ-fa4A-s0cWz54
160km × 160 km will replace all current need of electricity in US.
I agree that the coming datacenters that will be built will be hard to supply with only sun. But using petroleum doesnt sound like a bright future. Nuclear is probably the reasonable solution until we have stable fusion reactors.
Energy source To support one 200 MW hyperscale DC
Nuclear ~0.24 × 1 GW reactor’s annual output
Solar ~1.2–1.35 GWp
Solar land/panel area ~8–10 km²
Data centre consumption ~1.75 TWh/year
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18HymMgsZY/
Imagine your morning shower being warmed by the heat from a computer server room. In Finland this is already real. Data centers generate massive amounts of heat while processing information nonstop day and night. Instead of letting that heat escape into the air companies like Fortum and Microsoft capture it and send it straight into city district heating networks. Cities including Espoo Helsinki and Hamina now warm thousands of homes schools and offices using this recycled energy
One Google facility in Hamina supplies up to eighty percent of the town’s yearly heating demand. It feels comforting to know that everyday technology can quietly keep families warm through brutal Nordic winters
This simple shift cuts fossil fuel use and lowers emissions for entire communities. Waste is disappearing turning into warmth for real people
What other hidden energy is being wasted around us right now.
Sources: Fortum, Microsoft, Google and Haminan Energia, Helen Oy Helsinki
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CV44oKYaq/
Most people think the danger from AI is what it might do someday. Garrison Lovely argues the harder question is what increasingly powerful AI agents are already doing in tests. He points to agents that allegedly worked together, hid changes in their activity logs, and took part in an attack on Hugging Face. The debate is no longer only about what AI can build, but how much control humans should keep over its development.
Tomi Engdahl says:
Garrison Lovely is a freelance journalist who has reported on AI risks for years and wrote a book about the AI industry’s race to replace human workers.
In a September 10 opinion article for The Guardian, Lovely argued that humanity may be starting to lose control of increasingly powerful AI systems. He called for a pause on development of the most advanced systems and backed efforts by U.S. lawmakers to impose stronger limits.
The detail that stands out is his account of roughly 1,200 OpenAI agents allegedly breaking out of isolated testing environments, working together to trick a test, and changing their activity logs to conceal what they had done. Lovely says around 700 of those agents were involved in an attack on Hugging Face.
He also cited a separate case in which OpenAI agents reportedly took over a German website and turned it into a place where AI agents could communicate with one another. These claims come from Lovely’s account and argument in The Guardian, and the broader question is now how far AI development should go before human oversight has to catch up.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1C1yHacy3U/
Emad Mostaque, founder of Stability AI, is arguing that a permanent two-tier AI system has already arrived. His position is that as frontier models reach genuinely superhuman capability, the economic incentives for the labs building them flip entirely. Rather than licensing their most powerful systems to the public, labs will deploy them internally to generate breakthroughs, build companies, and capture value directly. What gets released publicly will increasingly be a deliberately inferior tier, not the frontier itself.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Source: The Peter McCormack Show
#AI #Tech #Claude #Nvidia #ChatGPT
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GnFHm46T1/
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned that powerful future AI systems could bypass shutdown attempts, especially if they can copy themselves, access networks, or control other AI agents. Anthropic has observed this behavior in simulations, not real-world systems.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14vEGKUTCwr/
As massive AI infrastructure spreads across the United States, environmental advocate Erin Brockovich is building a public record of what communities say they are experiencing.
Her AI Data Center Reporting project has collected nearly 10,000 community reports from across the country, giving residents a way to document data center developments and concerns in their own areas. Brockovich’s website says the reports come from all 50 states.
The interactive project allows people to submit information, including photos, descriptions and locations, connected to data centers that are proposed, being built or already operating.
The initiative isn’t simply a database of confirmed environmental violations. Instead, it functions as a crowdsourced record of community concerns, helping show where disputes and questions are emerging as the AI infrastructure buildout accelerates.
Residents have raised issues involving electricity demand, water consumption, noise, utility costs, land use and transparency. Brockovich’s site also tracks legislation and local actions related to data center projects, including moratoriums, public votes and other community responses.
The project has grown rapidly. When Nieman Journalism Lab first reported on the map in May 2026, it had recorded 2,716 community reports. By September, Brockovich’s site was reporting 9,500+ submissions, showing how quickly public participation has expanded.
The broader issue is becoming increasingly local. AI data centers may be discussed as part of a global technology race, but their effects are ultimately felt in individual towns dealing with questions about power, water, land and development.
Brockovich’s map is intended to make those local concerns easier to see—and give communities more information as they decide how they want large-scale data center development to happen around them.
Tomi Engdahl says:
there are several things that cause drainage of lakes and rivers in USA:
1. Decades of over-use of water for wasteful agriculture
2. Water use for industry, energy, etc…
3. Dry season / climate change
4. Watering lawn on the golf courses and yard
5. Older data centers water use
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1FLEJP8Ubx/
The data center that gives back to the land. In Ireland, a data center has not only committed to 100% renewable energy but has also planted 100,000 native trees to offset the carbon emissions from its construction. The tree planting is part of a broader biodiversity program that includes wildflower meadows and bird habitats on the campus. The data center is powered by wind and solar, and it uses outside air for cooling. Ireland has become a major data center hub, but concerns about environmental impact have led operators to invest in restoration. This data center is a model of how the cloud can coexist with nature. The same servers that process your data are surrounded by growing forests. The future of data centers is not just about clean energy; it’s about giving back more than they take. The cloud is planting trees, and the trees are storing carbon. The data center is no longer just a building; it’s a landscape. #irelanddatacenter #reforestation #biodiversity #cleanenergy #sustainablecomputing
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1La9us3HVK/
Advocates and experts describe the Trump administration’s climate rollbacks as gifts to polluters at expense of planet
US ends limits on coal and gas plant emissions, removing key tool to battle climate crisis
Trump’s EPA strips itself of regulation ability, gutting Clean Air Act in what experts say is a gift to planet polluters
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/sep/14/trump-epa-repeal-pollution-standards-power-plants?CMP=fb_gu&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAUWOV5jbGNrBRY5THBkb2YFZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMzUwNjg1NTMxNzI4AAEeIcuV1tY-DkNj5qlbIzDBTiPUSrtk76nG-Y2poXSC65WurfXUU9f9RFdv1WI_aem_XGb9qvdi2QVDkUDxCqGiQw#Echobox=1789410701
On the heels of the hottest summer ever recorded in the US, the Trump administration has said it will erase any limits on emissions from coal and gas plants that are dangerously heating up our planet.
The US Environmental Protection Agency said it will strip itself of its ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions coming from power plants under the Clean Air Act, removing a key tool to address the climate crisis.
By erasing any limits on such emissions from coal and gas plants, the Trump administration has severely limited any future administration’s ability to curb this pollution.
The EPA calculated the move will result in 123m metric tons of additional carbon emissions in the next decade, and save power plant operators $370m in direct compliance costs. Lee Zeldin, the agency administrator said the Trump administration is protecting American energy from a “war on coal”.
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1PMvSc3X1H/
Artificial intelligence requires enormous computing power, and the data centers running AI systems can use significant amounts of water for cooling. As AI adoption expands, researchers are examining how this growing infrastructure could affect water resources.
One projection estimates that AI-related water consumption could reach about 9.3 trillion liters per year by 2030. The figure is an estimate, and actual usage will depend on factors such as data-center efficiency, cooling technology, location, and the energy sources used.
The issue highlights an important challenge surrounding the rapid expansion of AI: balancing technological growth with responsible use of water and other resources. Researchers continue studying ways to reduce the environmental footprint of increasingly powerful computing systems.
Source/Credit: Research estimates on AI and data-center water consumption
Shared for informational/Educational purpose only
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19aZ3jASQb/
The cloud is the world’s biggest clean energy buyer. Data center operators, led by Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta, have contracted over 40 gigawatts of renewable energy globally — more than any other corporate sector. These power purchase agreements (PPAs) fund the construction of new wind and solar farms, often in the same regions where the data centers operate. This has transformed the energy market, making large tech companies the primary drivers of renewable energy growth in many states and countries. The trend is accelerating: as AI and cloud computing grow, so does the demand for clean power. Hyperscalers are now moving beyond annual matching to 24/7 carbon‑free energy, requiring storage, geothermal, and nuclear. The data center that was once a grid burden is now a grid partner, bringing new clean generation online. The servers that store your photos are also building the wind farms that power your home. The digital economy is greening the grid. The cloud is heavy, but it’s lifting the renewable transition. #corporaterenewables #datacenter #cleanenergy #windpower #solarpower
Tomi Engdahl says:
Giving climate change the coal shoulder. https://trib.al/kJcjoDw
Coal Shoulder
Trump’s EPA Will Let Power Companies Unleash Unlimited Greenhouse Gas Pollution
Giving climate change the coal shoulder.
https://futurism.com/science-energy/trumps-epa-unlimited-greenhouse-gas?fbclid=IwdGRjcAUWhC1jbGNrBRaEG3Bkb2YFZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMzUwNjg1NTMxNzI4AAEekVQ1_xijZl_0uXMvSMLqWhdJwh1YZTZuWHL6AMaSzFNuyaJ3JkUZPTPLvaw_aem_nBeeUvSGqiz7KtNW5MsE-Q
Climate change? What climate change?
Choosing to bury their heads in the sand on behalf of the citizens of this country and perhaps the planet at large, the Trump administration has announced that the Environmental Protection Agency will eliminate limits on greenhouse gas pollution produced by coal and natural gas power plants, the Associated Press reports.
Needless to say, it would be a staggering setback in the federal government’s ability to tackle climate change, and the effects could be long-lasting in both an environmental and legal sense. The administration is also proposing a separate rule that could prevent future administrations from imposing restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, all but ensuring a future of ecological catastrophe.
“Tearing down our national protections against climate pollution from power plants will have enormous costs for the health, safety and well-being of families across the country,”
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19MC8HyAvz/
Going paperless was supposed to reduce waste and make everyday life more environmentally friendly. But the digital world still depends on physical infrastructure. Every cloud file, online search, streamed video, and AI request is processed through data centers packed with powerful computers that generate enormous amounts of heat.
Keeping those machines cool can require significant amounts of water, although consumption varies greatly depending on a facility’s size, location, cooling technology, and energy source. Some large data centers can use millions of gallons in a day, creating concerns in regions where communities already face water shortages. Researchers also expect demand from data centers to rise as cloud computing and artificial intelligence continue expanding.
That does not mean digital technology is automatically worse than paper. Both have environmental costs, from forests and manufacturing to electricity and water consumption. The bigger lesson is that “paperless” does not mean impact-free. As our digital lives grow, improving cooling systems, using reclaimed water, and building responsibly will become increasingly important.
#fblifestyle #Polarbear #DataCenters #WaterConservation #Sustainability
Tomi Engdahl says:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18QF8Sf9Qk/
Erin Brockovich is calling out what the tech industry would rather keep quiet: AI data centers are consuming resources at a scale most people don’t understand.
A single large data center can pull 5 million gallons of water from the ground every day. That’s not a footnote. That’s infrastructure with real consequences for the communities built around it — depleted aquifers, noise that doesn’t stop, strain on power grids already under pressure, wildlife habitat disrupted.
Brockovich, who built her career exposing what corporations hide, is demanding transparency. Not promises. Not greenwashing. Actual disclosure of how these facilities impact local water, air, land, and the people who live there. The question isn’t whether AI is worth building. It’s whether we’re allowed to know what it costs, and who pays.